Textbooks @ MindSay 
school
deviant behavior: 63.01
rockin' out: 28.75
earth science: 73.00
eng: 2.88
comm: 60.00
total: 227.64 no shipping
half.com:
rockin out: 44.95
earth science: 47.18
eng: 3.11
comm: 55.53
deviant behavior: 58.90
total: 209.67 no shipp
combined:
193.24 no ship
and the unnecessary uncg bookstore price: $430+
First off, I want to thank those who gave me ideas... It took me awhile to finally write something, and honestly... I'm not sure if it is really that great of an argumentative essay... But it works... Here is my 5 page BLAH... Haha... Enjoy!
Textbook Tragedy
Growing up, many children dream of becoming doctors, lawyers, astronauts, teachers, and so on. As they come to the end of their high school experience though, they are rudely awakened by the possibility of never realizing their dream due to the prohibitive prices of higher education. College prices are skyrocketing out of reach for the average middle class high school graduate. Tuition fees can increase about 32% during the course of a four year degree, at a boost of approximately 8% annually. But, assuming one could conquer the extreme tuition expenses through scholarships, loans, grants and savings; let us look at another often overlooked factor of this imposing problem.
One aspect of college expenses that seems to be increasing at an exponential rate is the cost of textbooks. College textbook prices have increased at twice the rate of inflation within the last twenty years, and have followed closely behind tuition increases. This has become quite an issue for the average college-age American because, price of textbooks aside, they already struggle with being financially cleared for classes. What can be done? There are several approaches that could be taken and some are in the process at high state levels. Yet, there still remains a need for a realistic solution.
In the United States, textbook prices nearly tripled from December 1986 to December 2004. American students pay significantly more for the same book than students of other countries. Sometimes the cost difference can be half again, or even up to two thirds more in price. What is the reason for this radical difference? Could it really be that printing costs are that much more in America, or is it simply that American publishers are greedier, and their priority is profit?
At an average of every three years, publishers are putting out “new edition” textbooks and selling them for a higher price. Often times, the only updates in these versions are simple sentence changes to keep up with the culture. Unfortunately, they then stop printing the old versions, and thus the old versions become obsolete and cannot be used unless there are enough in a campus bookstore stock to prevent purchasing for a period of time.
If the purpose of the writers and publishers is to help students develop a well balanced and exceptional course of study, wouldn’t they want it to be for as many as possible to benefit our society today? If publishers reduced their production costs, so that more students could afford to purchase their products, then their profit margin would remain the same while allowing more to participate in the education benefits which they purpose to pursue. Writers and publishers need to make a living too, but why not make their products affordable to the students so that college can be within the reach of more young people?
Approximately, 70 percent of high school students attend college within two years after graduation. For the other 30 percent, cost is often their main deterring factor. The percentage of students attending college is growing because of the educational requirement for most employment positions. Only the most determined middle and lower class students push forward and struggle with the cost. Many of these are often left with daunting loan repayments for years after graduation. Although the college prices may play a big factor in this fairly large number of those who never attend, perhaps appealing to the publishers is where this battle of bills should begin.
Part of the publishers reasoning has been thought to correspond with the rising secondary markets. Internet sites are booming with buying used textbooks and reselling them to students at a lower cost. To avoid the problem of a decrease in sales, publishers print Fourth, Fifth, and even Sixth editions, so that students have to purchase the newer versions. By this, they are making the value market for used books nearly zero.
Perhaps part of a publisher’s problem is in no longer being able to sell new textbooks because of the used book sales among students and the flourishing market of used bookstore companies. Their strategy then, is if they can keep putting out new editions, they will continue to make their profit. But, with the printed copies publishers sell now, they often sell their large quantity of textbooks, and that is all the profit they make until their new edition is printed and sold.
Thus, the argument for publishers could come into account that if their books are simply being cycled around, they will never make a profit and slowly go out of business. Where would our textbook industry go? Would new text books ever be published to inform us of new information?
In August, 2005, the Government Accountability Office said students could spend up to as much as $900 a year on new textbooks and supplies. This is definitely not uncommon. It is reasonable for some textbooks to be of a fairly high cost, because there is a price to pay for the graphics and even some of the information used in the material. Also, textbooks are often printed on high quality paper, whereas a common novel is printed with a lot less cost and can be printed in mass for much less.
What options do we, as college students, have? What can the teachers do about it? Students spend a majority of their time online, so why not offer electronic textbooks online or by CD? Professor Terry Lovell, at Yavapai College said, "Textbooks are 15th century technology; we need to step into the 21st century." Lovell also commented, "If we use (online textbooks) we can save up to 50 percent, and they can update as new information comes, instead of needing to replace them."
Publishers would still make a profit by charging students to gain access to internet based materials, and the cost would go down considerably for college students, because there would be the elimination of printing costs. The problem that could be foreseen, as far as profit goes, would be students sharing the access. However, realistically, students already share textbooks in an effort to save resources. Worse yet, sometimes they don’t even purchase them because of the prohibitive prices, thus losing the educational opportunity that would be provided with access to these resources. Some schools, in an effort to accommodate lower income students, purchase a library copy of certain textbooks so that students may have access. Obviously, while this is helpful, it severely limits students’ ability to study outside of the library’s hours of operation.
Bundled textbooks are the books that come in plastic wrap and have extra material included, such as CD’s and other supplemental materials. With these simple, cheap additional items, they feel they have the right to charge a large sum more. All publishers should make unbundled books an option to students and teachers, because the bonus material is often left unused.
Publishers want to make more profit and offer other materials, but if these materials are so important, they would be used more often. Teachers should have the option to purchase them separately if they decide that the materials are important to their student’s education. But, most professors admit that the bonus material is never used in their courses.
There have been many attempts to make a difference. Students have set up petitions, taken bills to be passed to state officials, sent letters to some of the publishers, but perhaps there aren’t enough students requesting that they do their best to make textbooks as inexpensive as possible without sacrificing the educational value. Also, we need to urge them to make new editions only when it is educationally necessary. Certainly it is understandable that certain new developments in science would warrant significant changes in textbooks, but is it truly necessary to reprint an entire edition of a poetry book? Does the content change so significantly?
Some teachers request new teacher’s materials, as well as updated and attention grabbing charts. By this simple request, they are causing publishers to put out new editions which in most cases are sold with a fifty percent increase from the previous edition. They edit minor things in the textbook itself and also tend to bundle some additional materials rather than coming up with the requested information that can be sold separately.
If the current trend continues, by the time babies today enter college, they will be paying three times the current rate for college tuition. Correspondingly, college textbooks will also rise to an extremely high cost. College degrees will become more important to attain for a supportive job and high school graduates will have an even higher need to complete college. If a family waits until their child reaches their freshmen year of high school to start saving for college, they will need to make and set aside $56.12 weekly to make the same amount they would if they set aside $10 a week at birth at 4% interest to accumulate $12,663.44. This, of course, will not cover the entire cost of college, but will set a good foundation for at least their first year.
In summary, it is important to find ways to make college education less expensive. There needs to be an emphasis for college textbook prices to decrease rather than increase. Education should be valued above money, and many institutions are barely breaking even to manage this standard. Publishers can make a difference, but perhaps they need a good push. Write letters, sign petitions, or even better, become a publisher or textbook author and put an end to the madness of the outrageous expenses of education.
Bibliography:
FinAid Page, LLC; Mark Kantrowitz, Publisher. (2008). Tuition Inflation; Savings Goals. Retrieved 2008, from http://www.finaid.org/savings/tuition-inflation.phtml
Kinney, D. (2007 , May 28). Parents: It’s never too early to start saving for college. Retrieved April 2008, from http://www.fwbusinesspress.com/display.php?id=6123
Kirst, M. W., & Venezia, A. (2003). Undermining Student Aspirations. Retrieved 2008, from http://www.highereducation.org/crosstalk/ct0203/voices0203-undermining.shtml
Longley, R. (2005, August). GAO Probes College Textbook Price Increases. Retrieved April 2008, from About.com: http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/consumerawareness/a/gaobookcosts.htm
Meurer, D. (2008, March 11). Yavapai College board approves tuition increase. Retrieved April 2008, from http://www.dcourier.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&subsectionID=1&articleID=53274
The Editorial Board. (2008, April 10). Retrieved April 15, 2008, from New York Times: http://theboard.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/10/that-textbook-costs-how-much-200/
The State PIRGs. (2005, February). Retrieved April 2008, from Make Textbooks Affordable: http://www.maketextbooksaffordable.org/newsroom.asp?id2=15618
Monday, Wednesday, and Friday I have US History Since 1877 with Prof. Storie. This class, although not being taken along side any of my friends, should be okay in that the professor seems nice and (if all goes well) her TA will be Amy (Friend and former French classmate).
Mondays and Wednesdays I'll have Marriage and Family with my former Sociology professor, Betsie, from 1:40-3:00pm. Again, none of my friends are taking this class. However, I'm really looking forward to it because I love Betsie and her teaching style, the course material seems interesting to me, and I know I will learn a lot from her.
Tuesdays and Thursdays will be my art days. From 8:15-11:05am I will have Foundations in Painting (UGH! OI! NOOOO!) with Mira. I've heard all sorts of stuff about her as a prof. and I'm really kind of worried about the class. I'm no Monet/Van Gogh/Renoir/Marc/etc. when it comes to painting and I've heard that she'll tell you she loves your work then rip you apart during critique. So....oi. Keep your fingers crossed that don't tell her to go screw herself or something. lol Anyway, Paula from last semester's 3D & Drawing, Drew (also from Drawing), and Sis are all supposed to be in the class. So...hopefully it won't suck too much. Also, Josiah's going to try to get in (right now it's full), but it doesn't look very promising. :(
Directly after that class I'll have Lithography with Hilton from 11:15-2:05pm. This class it definitely looking better to me than painting (after all, the work focuses more on drawing skills). Sis, Paula, Jerome (cool guy; friend of sis), and [hopefully] Ariel will all be in this class. So, I'm kinda psyched about it. :)
As far as work goes, the plan is that Subway will have my soul on either Friday nights or Saturday mornings (I have yet to determine which) and I'll volunteer at Girls Inc. on Tues and Thurs.
In terms of preparation for the start of classes goes (week after next)...I still need to do a bunch of stuff which includes but is not limited to: Cleaning my room, coming up with ideas of projects in Lithography, finishing my sewing projects so I'll have some rad threads to sport during the semester, get into the habit of walking 30 mins a day [again], learn to wake up early [again]--no more 10am sleep ins, catch up on laundry, etc.
Oh hey, also, good news is that in terms of text books, I'm pretty much set! I need one for History...but I'm not sure that it's going to be required since the bookstore says it's not even in stock/available. So, yay! That means I won't be 100% broke after buying all the art supplies that I'll be needing (eek!).
I do an unfortunate amount of supplementing for my written and aural theory classes. My "philosophy" about textbooks is this - they should be useful for instruction and learning. Students should be able to turn to their textbooks outside of class to learn MORE than what was given to them in class. Music theory textbooks should have lots of exercises that trigger, enhance, and synthesize kinesthetic, aural, and visual learning patterns. Well, I could go on and on . . . on this tangent . . . so I'll get to my point.
Music Theory Texbooks I like:
- Kostka & Payne - Tonal Harmony: We used this at Rice University, and it served me well as a student. It continues to serve me well as a teacher.
- Roig-Francoli - Harmony in Context: If you prefer to teach music theory from a "historical" pedagogical perspective, this is the book you should use! Contact McGraw-Hill for a review copy (sorry students, you cannot apply for a review copy).
- Benjamin, Horvit, Nelson - Music for Analysis: Most textbooks only provide 4-8 measure "snippets" of literature examples. Most students need to see more of the musical example for the concepts to make sense. (I don't like the accompanying CD for this book because individual examples don't always get their own "track".)
Aural Theory/Perception Texbooks I like:
- Krueger - Progressive Sight Singing: The title is inaccurate . . . this is much more than a sight singing book. This is a very good aural theory/perception textbook, and I will likely make it mandatory for my section of aural perception next year.
- Kazez - Rhythm Reading: Because if you don't get rhythm . . . you won't get music!
- Other books I turn to less frequently include Benward & Kolosick's Ear Training: A Technique for Listening (which is not useful for self-study) and Mayfield's Theory Essentials, vol. 1.
If anyone reading this has recommendations, please leave a comment! I'm a new textbook junkie.
Hey All,
I'm not here for long. Just wanted to update real quick. Well, I don't have much of an update. I keep thinking my classes start tomorrow. I think it's because I worked with a certain person a lot this weekend. I usually work with her on Tuesdays and Wednesdays I have the day off. So, needless to say, I look forward to Tuesdays because I'm on day closer to my day off 
I've gotta get books tomorrow for my classes, but I'm getting my eyes dialated for an eye exam. Hopefully, my eyes will be back to normal before then. Yeah, they'd better be because I don't really wanna go into work with my eyes dialated. Someone might think I was on extasy or something. That would be bad. Oh, but wait, you can come into work with a hang over and not get fired....so why couldn't I come into work completely stoned?? I wouldn't get fired. I don't get stoned anyway. It was just a thought. People where I work are crazy. Eh, that's all for now. Gots stuff to do. Later ya'll
Showing 1 - 5. [ Next ]
