| Note from blogmaster: I have my own feelings about the way the FDA will pass drugs right and left that end up killing hundreds of people and then go on a rampage to remove an herb that has "possibly" killed one, due to massive overdose or contamination of product. There is a vast imbalance existing between what the FDA approves and does not approve and the difference is money. Hope you enjoy this lively discussion on the safety of health supplements, courtesy of Ira Marxe over at Good Health Supplements. Does he have an axe to grind? Well, it could be said so since he's in the supplement business. It could also be said that the axe is worth grinding. I happen to agree that, given the staggering number of deaths due to prescription drugs each year, herbs and vitamins are much safer overall. Are vitamins safe? Should you be afraid to take your health supplements? Health Care Article Written by Ira Marxe | | |
It never ceases to amaze me how successfully fear is used to run our daily lives. We are bombarded with fear generating advertisements on radio, television, the newspapers and magazines.
If you don’t buy it in the next 12 hours, you will lose it forever. If you don’t buy this food or that food, you get a heart attack.
Pictures are painted for your imagination of what will happen to you if you don’t get your doctor to prescribe this drug or that drug and then there are books written by so called experts with book titles designed to frighten you into buying their book because if you don’t, the knowledge you will miss could cost you your life!
One such book was recently written by Dan Hurley who is the health and medical writer for the New York Times. When you read his book, you have to ask yourself, is Mr. Hurley more interested in making big bucks from the sale of his books then he is in providing us with honest information about nutritional supplements?
Can those who believe what he writes bring big trouble upon themselves because giving up or shying away from nutritional supplements can negatively impact their health and lives?
The title of Dan Hurley’s book is “Natural Causes: Death, Lies and Politics in America’s Vitamin and Herbal Supplement Industry” (Broadway Books). In the book he accuses the industry of just about everything short of causing the black plaque.
He states on the cover that the industry sells products that are “untested, unproven, and often tragically unsafe.” The book is intended to be disturbing (that’s what makes it sell), and creates concerns especially for people who take supplements regularly.
But should we really be worried based on the information in Mr. Hurley’s book? I think not.
Hurley’s vitriol is mostly aimed at the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) of 1994.
Here is what Hurley says about this act, "Breathtaking in its dimension, DSHEA would end forever the simple legal dichotomy between 'food' and 'drug' to create a third, hermaphroditic category that was both yet neither: the dietary supplement. And beyond the usual suspects -- vitamins, minerals, herbs, amino acids -- the law would permit the manufacturers to define a product as a 'dietary supplement' merely by saying so, no matter if it were artificially derived."
This statement, however, in far from correct.
Here, for example, is an excerpt taken straight from the FDA Web site: "The provisions of DSHEA define dietary supplements and dietary ingredients; establish a new framework for assuring safety; outline guidelines for literature displayed where supplements are sold; provide for use of claims and nutritional support statements; require ingredient and nutrition labeling; and grant FDA the authority to establish good manufacturing practice (GMP) regulations."
Funny, but this appears to be the exact opposite of what Dan Hurley is saying.
Hurley goes on to say that DSHEA turned the clock back 100 years when it comes to regulation of these products, which he also refers to as remedies "redolent of the snake oil era."
He picks the act apart, suggesting it lets anyone sell anything, regardless of how ineffective or even dangerous it might be, and says the industry doesn't have to answer to potential side effects or dangers (called "adverse events") experienced by consumers because the industry is not required to report these events to the government.
I don’t believe this! Where did he get this information from or did he just invent it to sell books?
Far from deregulating the industry, DSHEA elevates FDA industry regulations to nearly match the heavily regulated food industry.
The FDA now has new controls which include its ability to ban supplements, oversee good manufacturing practices, review health claims and hold manufacturers responsible for mislabeled or unsafe products.
The DSHEA also requires manufacturers to supply the FDA with adequate safety information at least 75 days before introducing any “new dietary ingredient” that was not in the food supply before the passage of the DSHEA, and yet another government agency, the Federal Trade Commission, regulates all dietary supplement advertising.
Given these regulations, does this sound like the DSHEA has weakened the laws governing nutritional supplements? I think not.
Hurley offers many ideas for cleaning up the supplement industry, ideas that are already in place.
For example: Hurley calls for better labeling, but DSHEA already requires dietary supplements to list the name and quantity of each ingredient and to identify the part of the plant used for herbal supplements.
Hurley calls for FDA regulation of manufacturing standards. Yet, currently, good manufacturing practice regulations are modeled after current food regulations. Furthermore, the FDA inspects dietary supplement plants.
Hurley also states that manufacturers of supplements do not have to report adverse events caused by their products to the FDA.
Hurley does not do his homework. In December 2006, a bill was passed amending the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to require manufacturers, distributors and packers of nonprescription drugs and dietary supplements to report serious adverse events to the US Department of Health and Human Services.
Here are some interesting statistics for you: In 2005, the FDA received more than 300,000 serious adverse event reports about drugs. In the same year, it received just 500 reports regarding dietary supplements.
Compare the relative safety and efficacy of vitamins and herbal supplements to further statistics: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like ibuprofen, aspirin, and naproxen are responsible for about 16,500 deaths annually.
Prescription drugs, in spite of extensive testing, cause more that 106,000 deaths annually. You rarely hear of a death caused by nutritional supplements.
Hurley demeans the efficacy of such vitamins as vitamin E, and blatantly omits a Harvard study of over 87,000 nurses in the age range of 34 to 59 that found a 41% reduction in heart disease risk among those who took at least 100 IU of vitamin E supplements for at least 2 years.
A study of almost 40,000 male health professionals ages 40 to 75, found a 37% lower risk of heart disease among those who took daily vitamin E supplements of at least 100 IU for more than two years.
A National Institute of Aging study of 11,000 elderly people found that those who used vitamins C and E supplements had a 53% reduction in mortality from heart disease and a 42% reduction in death from all causes compared with non-users.
There are many other half truths and ignored studies in the book.
It is unfortunate that because of the size of his following and the position he holds in the New York Times, so many people will take this to heart and believe what he written.
Tragically, creating the fear that will keep people from buying nutritional supplements can cause some people their lives.
From my point of view, Dan Hurley’s reports can no longer be trusted regarding health matters. That is most unfortunate as Dan Hurley’s reports reach a wide audience.
Ten years ago I had congestive heart failure. Had it not been for nutritional supplements, I might be dead today.
We have horrendous health problems in the US today which will not be resolved until our medical profession begins looking for answers in nutritional supplements and not in drugs.
My best wishes for you good health and longevity.
Ira Marxe
Health Disclaimer: The information contained in this or any GHS related articles or materials are not intended to take the place of personal medical advice from your health care professional. Any action taken based on the contents found in this or any GHS related articles, materials or information is at the sole discretion of the reader. Readers should consult appropriate health professionals as necessary on any matter relating to their health and well-being. Any information or opinions provided here or in any GHS related articles, materials or information are believed to be accurate and sound, however no GHS personal or associates will be held responsible on behalf of any reader who fails to consult appropriate health authorities with respect to their individual health care, and the author or publisher of any information is not responsible for errors or omissions.
This Health News Monthly is in no way sent unsolicited. You're getting this newsletter because you are a current Good Health Supplements client.
GHS Health News Monthly is Copyrighted © 2007
AntiAging Life Extension Dot Com, Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
No part of this publication may be reproduced without
express written permission from the publisher.
Good Health Supplements™ products are dietary supplements
and are in no way intended to diagnose, treat, cure
or prevent any disease.