Second @ MindSay 
friends
Note from blogmaster: I'm happy to bring you this special announcement about the health care articles database at one of my favorite companies. As a wellness counselor, I often refer people to the excellent informaion on this site. I hope you enjoy reading the articles and also, check out the very limited special sale going on, note about that at end of blog post.
At Native Remedies, we use education as a powerful tool to encourage emotional, psychological and physical wellbeing. To achieve optimal health levels it is necessary to understand what living a healthy lifestyle truly means. A healthy life doesn't only mean avoiding fast food and squeezing in a little exercise; it encompasses a keen awareness, smart decision-making, and an overall active lifestyle.
We are faced with lifestyle choices everyday that can either contribute to or detract from your good health. With toxins all around – air pollutants and even chemicals in the foods you eat – making good choices can greatly minimize how much these toxins actually affect you.
With more than 600 million people worldwide dealing with chronic lung disease as a result of cigarettes and air pollution, and environmental agencies globally reporting the dangers of pesticides in foods, it is time to seriously evaluate how diet and lifestyle affect your health. You can learn how to stop smoking for good with tips you gain from our health care article on the subject.
To find out more about this topic and the natural remedies that can help you achieve optimal health, just read our featured articles. Dozens of health care articles to help with your wellness goals, including several on detoxing the body, a hot topic this time of year.
You can also check out our article on Detox Herbs for Effective Internal and External Cleansing Plus, How a Detox Homeopathic Kit Can Help in Detoxification.
Start making the right decisions for your future health today with the help of Native Remedies.
Related articles: Detoxing heavy metals
Second Life (abbreviated as SL) is an Internet-based virtual world video game launched on June 23, 2003, developed by Linden Research, Inc (commonly referred to as Linden Lab), which second life linden came to international attention via mainstream news media in late 2006 and early 2007.
Second Life is one of several virtual worlds that have been inspired by the cyberpunk literary movement, and second life money particularly by Neal Stephenson's novel Snow Crash. The stated goal of Linden Lab is to create a world like the Metaverse described by Stephenson, a user-defined world in which people can interact, play, do business, and otherwise communicate.
Second Life linden virtual currency is the Linden Dollar (Linden, or L$) and is exchangeable for real world currencies in a resident to resident marketplace facilitated by Linden Lab. There is no fee for registering an account or participating in Second Life, however registration of "payment information" is mandatory in order to participate second life money in some functions, such as owning land or islands, as well as to access certain support features such as Second Life's support portal and online forums.
At the end of March 2008, approximately 13 million second life cheap accounts were registered, although a large percentage of these are inactive, some Residents have multiple accounts, and there are no reliable figures for actual long term consistent usage. In January 2008, residents spent 28,274,505 hours there, so on average about 38,000 residents were logged on at any particular moment. Despite buy second life linden its prominence, Second Life has notable competitors, including IMVU, There, Active Worlds, Kaneva, and the erotic-oriented Red Light Center.
In 2008 Second Life was honored at the 59th Annual Technology & Engineering Emmy Awards for advancing the development of online sites with user generated content. Philip Rosedale, President of Linden Lab, accepted the award.
Hi everbody! My name is Kira Westland and I am from Second Life. Welcome to my blog. My blog is all about life....on Second Life.
I hope all my visitors will join in on the discussions about Second Life.
Together we can explore and learn many new things.
I look forward to sharing both my own experiences and those of other members within Second Life. The Second Life community is one of wonder, learning, self-expression and just plain awe. And, just as in Real Life, it can be one of hurt and frustration.
It is my hope to share stories about what happens in Second Life, the good and the bad, with my readers and participants.
of whether individual Americans have the right to keep and bear arms
or whether it a collective right of the people for service in a state militia.
That question is at the heart of a long, impassioned debate
about how much power the government has to keep people
from owning guns and it could soon be decided by the
U.S. Supreme Court in a case about one of the nation's
strictest gun control laws.
Set for arguments today, March 18 and with a decision expected by late June,
the nation's highest court could resolve once and for all the much-disputed
meaning of the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Written 219 years ago, the amendment says, "A well regulated militia,
being necessary to the security of a free state,
the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Few constitutional law issues have triggered more scholarly debate
and historical research on whether the Constitution's authors intended
to guarantee an individual right or a collective right tied to service
in a state-regulated militia, like today's National Guard.
The arguments follow a series of mass shootings in the past year
-- multiple killings on at least three college campuses, two shopping centers
and one Missouri town meeting.
Gun deaths average 80 a day in the United States, 34 of them homicides,
according to Centers for Disease Control data, and yet the gun issue has
barely registered in the U.S. presidential campaign.
If the court finds it is an individual right, gun control advocates fear it could
place in jeopardy not only the ban on private handgun ownership in the
U.S. capital at issue in the case, but also other laws around the country
regulating and restricting private possession of firearms.
The Supreme Court's last review of the Second Amendment came in
a five-page discussion in an opinion issued nearly 70 years ago that
failed to definitively resolve the constitutional issue.
That could change when the justices consider whether a 32-year old
Washington, D.C., law banning private possession of handguns violates
the Second Amendment rights of individuals unaffiliated
with any state-regulated militia.
DIVISIVE ISSUE
Former top U.S. Justice Department officials including former
Attorney General Janet Reno, law professors, linguistic experts
and historians all argued the Second Amendment protects
the right of people only to keep arms for militia service.
On the other side, the National Rifle Association, a majority of
the U.S. Senate and a majority of the House of Representatives
argued an individual has the right to possess arms.
Believe it or not, as they were trampling over all the other amendments,
The current administration, under then-Attorney General John Ashcroft,
reversed the position the federal government had taken for decades
and said in 2001 the Second Amendment protected an individual right
to possess firearms for a lawful private purpose.
Solicitor General Paul Clement, the administration's chief advocate
before the Supreme Court, filed a brief with the justices that adopted
many arguments made previously by legal scholars for an individual
right to keep arms.
He said placement of the Second Amendment within the Bill of Rights
reinforced the view that it was intended to put certain individual private
activities beyond the reach of the national government.
Others disagreed, including 15 historians.
"As histories of the Revolutionary era, we are confident ... that the authors
of the Second Amendment would be flabbergasted to learn that in endorsing
the republican principle of a well-regulated militia, they were also precluding
restrictions on such potentially dangerous property as firearms," they said.
Three professors of linguistics and English said the amendment's purpose
was to preserve or perpetuate a well-regulated militia and that it used
unmistakably military language.
"The term 'bear arms' is an idiom that means to serve as a soldier, do military
service, fight," they said in citing the Oxford English Dictionary.
Former high-ranking U.S. military officers filed a brief that argued another
interpretation -- that the amendment guarantees a blend of
individual and community rights.
"The Second Amendment ensures both the individual's right to posses firearms,
subject to reasonable regulation, and the constitutional goal of collective
defense readiness," they said.
The Second Amendment is written in two clauses,
a prefatory and an operative clause.
The first clause, "a well regulated militia" is prefatory.
The second clause, "the right of the people" is operative.
Those either choose not to recognize this, or don't know English grammar.
In determining whether the Second Amendment’s guarantee is an individual one,
the most important word is the one the drafters chose to describe the holders
of the right—“the people.”
That term is found in the First, Second, Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendments.
It has never been doubted that these provisions were designed to protect the
interests of individuals against government intrusion, interference, or usurpation.
Since the 2nd Amendment (or any other part of the Constitution)
does not clearly and specifically deny personal gun ownership,
it can simply be argued that there is no legal basis for banning
personal gun ownership.
The National Guard is NOT a professional Army. A professional
at anything makes the major portion of his living from that activity.
Members of the National Guard are "part-time" soldiers, their
professions are the jobs that they get pulled away from.
Having said that, the 2nd amendment states that THE PEOPLE have
right to bear arms. The Bill of Rights addresses three groups
the country, the states and THE PEOPLE.
That means that ANY CITIZEN can own a gun.
Of course, any group would be hard pressed trying to defend themselves
(with a bunch of hunting rifles) from the government
unless you hid in caves or underground tunnels
and struck only when you had the advantage
Our military has had a poor track record when trying to fight
people who's nation was at stake
The military industrial complex mighty as it may be,
is no match for the sands of time, nor to those with the will and of free mind.
Emily was not in my class this year, so I was really scared. It ended up, alright, though. I had the nicest teacher EVER this year. I don't think I'll ever have a nicer teacher. Mark was in my class this year! I was sooooo happy!
My two most memorable moments from this grade would be...
Every morning when we came in the classroom we would walk up to the board and answer some kind of question, usually by filling up a bar graph of some sort. Well one morning, Mark came in after me, and the question for that day was to fill in a space under your favorite cursive letters. From what I remember, the choices were: A, C, E, G, H, R, and Z. Well, I picked H, since that was the first letter of his last name. He looked at me, and then he took the marker from my hand and he put A as his favorite letter. A is the beginning of my last name. Coincidence? I think not, hehe.
My second memorable moment would be the time when Selina, Mark, Matt, and I were the only ones left in the lunchroom after lunch - you know, just finishing up eating. Well, Mark and Matt was about two tables away from us. So Selina and I were just sitting there eating and talking. We were just about to get up and throw our lunches away, when she asked me, whispering, "Hey, who do you like? I promise I won't tell anyone - and if you tell me, I'll tell you who I like." So, guess what I did? I told her. How stupid I was, hehe. So, I told her, Mark and Matt - and there they were - boy, was I dumb back then! Her face lit up with expression and she smiled, and replied back with, "You do!?" and so I just said yeah. Then, she yelled across the lunchroom, "Mark, Matt! Alison likes you!" So, there I was, completely embarrassed, when I saw one of them smiling and the other one just looked dumbfounded. I'm still not sure what to think about it up to this day...
It was a pretty fun grade, though. A lot of good memories.
Showing 1 - 5. [ Next ]