Riaa @ MindSay

   

Related tags

 

   


 

   
A scene from Invisible Movement
So I'm checking out this album from John Frusciante - the ex/current guitarist for Red Hot Chili Peppers - called Shadows Collide With People. Its pretty fucking good. Most of his other solo stuff I heard was pretty strange but this album is quality shit. He has an album called 'Curtains' that is also excellent.

I'm also almost done downloading the entire Toad the Wet Sprocket body of work, which is gonna be good. Please don't tell the RIAA.

OK, you can tell them. I don't care.
Tell those fuckers I'm downloading Ritual de lo Habitual too. I might be ok though, cause once upon a time I owned it.

I spend alot of time making sure all the ID3 tags and shit are right on all my music. I hate opening up iTunes and seeing some shit like 'davessupermusicfolderAliceInChains_-nuTshell.mp3' - Hell no, not on my watch.
If you're gonna be sharing, clean that shit up.
You can't trust some program to do it for you either. Its all gotta be labeled painstakingly by hand.

It's been raining here in God's country.






 
 
   
 

THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA NAMES NAMES (WELL, SORT OF)
The University of Nebraska at Lincoln has voluntarily given the recording industry the Internet protocol addresses of students who allegedly have illegally downloaded music, not waiting for the RIAA to subpoena those records. Most U.S. colleges have done likewise, although the University of Wisconsin said last month it would not cooperate with the recording industry unless subpoenas were issued.

"The recording industry's three-month-old enforcement effort is a ploy to scare students into accepting pre-lawsuit settlements; the industry saves money by not having to take students to court", a student spokesman said. " They're strong-arming people into this." Earlier the University of Nebraska had a history of defying the RIAA. What happened? What is this university thinking? Now they are naming names (well, sort of).

And on March 2, 2007, the University of Nebraska  allowed StratCom on campus with its cosponsorship of the “Space and TeleCom Law Conference”.   StratCom?.... that sponsored the now-infamous “warrantless wiretap” program conducted by the National Security Agency?.... In the sanctuary of a college campus?

What next?
 
 
 

   
Another website for the Internet Radio Station story
This one has a google spreadsheet detailing the costs of the new proposal:

Click here

Check it out
 
 
   
 

Internet Radio
A friend sent me this article today, reprinted from Save Internet Radio

Steams me about as much as DRM does...  The *only* reason for this is money.  There is no other reason at all to squelch small time internet radio stations...read on:


Save Internet Radio

March 2nd, 2007

If the RIAA and SoundExchange get their way, independent webcasting / Internet radio will soon cease to exist.

Why? Earlier today, the Copyright Royalty Board, the group overseeing statutory licensing for US-based internet radio stations, announced the new royalty rates for streaming radio performance rights. The board rejected the arguments made by webcasters and instead chose to adopt the proposal put forth by industry-backed SoundExchange, a royalty fee collection agency created by the RIAA.

The new rates are based on “performances” of songs. A “performance” is defined as one song being streamed to a single listener. In other words, a station with 1000 listeners is charged for 1000 performances of each song it broadcasts.

Further, the new rates, just announced today, are retroactive to 2006, and increase rapidly each year. The rates per performance are as follows:

$0.0008 in 2006
$0.0011 in 2007
$0.0014 in 2008
$0.0018 in 2009

At first glance, those seem like fairly small numbers: eight ten-thousandths of a dollar, eleven ten-thousandths of a dollar, and so on. When you actually do the math, however, you see the truth revealed. The average radio station plays 16 songs in an hour. Under this system, that would be equivalent to 16 performances.

0.0011 x 16 = 0.0176

Still a fairly small number - under two cents. But now assume this station has 1000 listeners. That means that, in one hour, the station would be billed for 16,000 performances.

0.0011 x 16000 = 17.60

That’s $17.60 an hour. Now we’re starting to see how expensive this truly is. Multiply that by 24 hours a day.

17.60 * 24 = 422.40

$422.40 a day. But there’s 365 days in a year.

422.40 * 365 = 154176

$154,176 for the year in performance royalties alone for a station with 1000 listeners. And that’s just for 2007: it gets even worse. In 2008, the cost rises to $193,536 for the year. In 2009, it goes up to $248,832. Even for a much smaller station, the royalties owed are huge.

Of course, these figures don’t include the other set of rights that Internet radio stations are required to purchase, which must be licensed separately from an agency like SESAC or ASCAP, or the cost of bandwidth and server capacity. When you add all these costs together, you can easily see why nobody, save perhaps a megacorporation like AOL or Yahoo, could afford to pay these rates.

But wait - what’s this? The new rates apply retroactively to the beginning of 2006. In other words, someone who has been happily (and legally) running their small internet radio station for the past few years is suddenly going to be hit with possibly hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional royalties owed. These bills could easily cause a small, independent broadcaster (and his family) to go bankrupt.

Meanwhile, over-the-air radio stations are still not required to pay one dime to the record industry for public performance rights from SoundExchange or an equivalent group. They only need to pay the far more reasonable fees of BMI, ASCAP, and/or SESAC. This reads like another tactic by the recording industry and corporate powers to exert control over anyone involved with music and an attempt to destroy independent broadcasting.

Whether you don’t want to see your favorite internet radio station go off the air, whether you just hate the RIAA, whatever the reason: please, help us get this senseless, greedy policy designed to do nothing but line the pockets of the record industry overturned. Write to, or better yet call, your representative, your senators, and the Copyright Royalty Board. Tell your friends and family, write on your blog, digg this - help get the word out and help to Save Internet Radio!

If you are a webcaster, we want to hear from you! How will this affect your station? What do you plan on doing? Drop us a line at feedback@save-internet-radio.com. If you’re someone involved with setting these rates, you’re also welcome to contact us and explain why you think these rates are fair.

We’ll be updating this site with more information as this progresses, so please check back and get involved!



 
 
 

   
An artist's take on the RIAA
Very interesting speech by Courtney Love.  She may be a freak but she has an insiders look at the music industry. Warning it does contain some bad language.
Full Speech Here

-Peace Out
 
 
   
 

Showing 1 - 5.   [ Next ]
 
Latest Comment
Re: Obama…Fuck That Arab Muslim Bastard - I think that your point is that if hanging a likeness of Obama is...

Read...


 
© 2005-2007 MindSay Interactive LLC
| Terms of Service
| Privacy Policy
My Account
Inbox
Account Settings
Lost Password?
Logout
Blog
Update Blog
Edit Old Entries
Pick a Theme
Customize Design
Modify Plugins
Community
Your Profile
Wiki Pages
MindSay Tags
Video & Photos
Geographic Directory
Inside MindSay
About MindSay
MindSay and RSS
Report Spam
Contact Us
Help