Relativity @ MindSay 
einstein
_____________________________________________________
Date Line July 6, 2007
IRAN! Bush accuses it of wanting nuclear capabilities for the purpose of making nuclear weapons. Bush, of course, has an ideal track record of assertions: he has yet to be correct on anything.
Iran, one of the world leaders in oil production, has imposed gasoline rationing. Iran does no produce its own gasoline; thus it cannot hope to have a mechanized military capability of any meaning other than defensive.
Iran, one of the world leaders in oil production, has declared it is going to promote dual usage, hybrid, vehicles. Apparently, Iran�s leadership sees no long-term future in gasoline production.
Iran, one of the world leaders in oil production, wants nuclear power, nuclear electric production capacity; Iran, one of the world leaders in oil production, wants hybrid, fuel efficient vehicles.
There is only one rational conclusion, Iran, one of the world leaders in oil production, is attempting to free its oil reserves for export in a period which promises much higher energy prices.
What are the possible reasons for a nation which boasts forty CENT per gallon gasoline to be looking to cut its consumption?
Could it be the Iranians foreseeing a collapse of domestic production throughout the Middle East? Would that require an expansion of American disruption of Middle East oil production; we have witness this in Iran, under our oil industry President and Administration.
Could it be the Iranians foreseeing the reality behind persistent reports, denied by the Bush Administration, that global reserves are depleting at a much higher than anticipated rate?
Could it be the Iranians foresee a a profit in selling carbon credits to the richer, very wasteful, nations? America would certainly be their primary market.
Whenever a nation behaves contrary to rational understanding, it is time to check what we are basing our understanding upon. To date, we have based our actions and understanding on the Evangelical concept of reality.
The Evangelicals promote a literal reading of a "divine" document, the authors of which view as fluid.
Evangelicals fail to adhere to any of precepts and commandments they assert should be taken literally. In fact, as I have previously pointed out, Evangelicals follow the teachings of one whose real purpose might well have been their self-annihilation.
The choice made is between superstitious "faith" and unsupported "belief", or three elements of the divine spirit: "Knowledge, Wisdom, and Understanding." Do we live by assertion, or by reality?
Upon what basis have we built society? Do we rely upon witch trials, burning people at the stake, inquisition through torture, and all the other Evangelical, Right-wing, derived techniques? Certainly the Bush Administration believes we should; but they get everything wrong.
It is time that we study reality. It is time we moved in the direction of universal peace and government. No need for a single sovereign state; rather a union of sovereign states, a Global Union of States.
That is, in essence, the prediction which the Evangelicals say should be taken literally. Why are they working against it? Why are they working for a Global Destruction of States? Why do they persist in their desire for inflicting the most harm on the most people?
Evangelicals are interesting. Osama Bin Laden is clearly an Islamic Evangelical with the same agenda as those Christian Evangelicals who hold that Mormons and Catholics are not Christians. The problem, of course, is the one which Gandhi pointed out: it's a great religion, too bad nobody practices it.
Islam is a great religion, but once again we have the problem that none follow the Koran teachings; most simply find the hate passages and follow those. It is no wonder that the Khazar King, given the option of selecting a religion for his people, rejected both the Islamic and Christian faiths. Why follow followers, when you can follow the one they both acknowledge as the true leader.
SIGH, once again, drifted from the subject. Look to the small mentions in the news. Ask the question "WHY?" And continue to ask it until you have an answer which works.
Einstein did not necessarily like the answers Relativity provided; it is clear that he ignored many subsequent findings in his search for that one simple formula which would provide causality. Causality, reality, are often difficult; one truth, the Right-wing causes of the problems.
_____________________________________________________
FOOTNOTE Observation: Einstein had a series problem with Quantum Physics; most reality based physicists acknowledge Quantum probabilities are a rational approach to reality. What they fail to acknowledge, what Einstein should have realized, is that Quantum Physics is relative in the most amusing sense.
To any seeking a solution to the probabilities which comprise the basis of Quantum Physics: Their perspective is the problem with the quest for any Unified Field Theorem.
Quantum Physicists view the universe relatively, they view reality relative to the perspective of the observer, rather than the perspective of the particle being observed.
Reality, planets and such, are observed in their own right. Nuclear particles must be deduced and therefore they cannot be observed until the are observed. The observer has the problem of guessing when and where a particle will be at any moment of observation; hence it is a science based upon probabilities.
Quantum Physicists are the Evangelicals physical science.
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
Date Line June 28, 2007
Some days I wake with the weirdest thoughts and feelings. Often they are connected with things I'm involved in and have "slept on"; like the new book "Einstein", relativity and the Unified Field Theory.
If Space is curved, gravity is physical; if electromagnetic force and magnetic force are interchangeable, they are different perspectives on the same thing, on makes the other, male and female; but gender applies to which force of nature?
I have taught, wrote and professed: "Everything is the same, they just change the name." I have also been known to postulate what can be readily seen in the structure of the formulas for the movement of both planets and electrons around their respective structural centers: "Everything is the same, they just change the order of magnitude."
Gravity is a curvature of spacetime related to mass. Ultimately, the mass of creation causes space time to close upon itself (evidenced by "black holes" discovered in Einstein's Relativity Formulations) and so we have a continuous, infinite, spacetime within a finite structure.
That is all simple and obvious enough. Yet the Unified Field Theory seems to have alluded the great mind of Einstein; and it is complicated by the behaviors associated within Quantum Mechanics.
Could it be that the problem is one of an "order of magnitude" as defined in the respective constants? That the Unified Field Theory is predicated on the formula necessary to derive the constant for each level of magnitude; and that formula is the unifier?
A "Constant" is a fudge factor that is unique to a realm of behavior, or to a context, as expressed by the words. Under "these conditions" all things are defined by X adjust by a constant order of magnitude factor of Y. The words "these conditions", can also be expressed as "when talking about."
The "Constant", the context defining "fudge factor", is the control. It can be seen as the core of a cluster grouping. Or, it can be seen as the common center of all cluster groupings. Consider that this concept is pictured in a previous posting of the haplogroups and their cultural, or regional, connections.
Since all Humans have a common ancestor, thus all haplogroups and haplotypes are derived from mutations in that primary genome; and it serves as the central locus. We define the constant of change by simply saying there is change and now this cluster is grouped around certain values.
The Unified Field Theory is the formula for the constant which defines, or validates, the formula order of magnitude for each cluster; where Einstein Clusters are quantum, gravity, electromagnetic, and all other fields definable within the physics discipline.
Now that the search is defined, who will be the mathematical to derive the basic formula? And it will be as elegant as E equals MC squared.
At times, like the Genie of Aladdin, it is to awaken with anger - anger towards children who do not communicate with their father. Other times, it is thinking on genealogy, heritage, and origins. Guess there is an obvious pattern in the connection.
Once a Jew, always a Jew. It is the basic law of Judaic thought; and a factor in the element of "Chose Life" which allowed Maimonides to counsel conversion under the sword over death by the sword. To the Jew, being a martyr is disrespectful, and disobedient, to God.
God knows what you are, and, regardless of what is declared for the sake of living with fools, you are that. The objective is to live, reproduce, and, over time, the fools will vanish.
Spacetime turns back upon itself; and all is at the end as it was in the beginning; yet there is no end, nor beginning after it has begun.
The single constant toward which we move, that single constant to be resolved, is the creation point lost within the folding of spacetime. It can also be said that, that which cannot be resolved is the creator: all things have a starting point; deny that truth and you deny the creator, or deny the creator, and you deny that basic reality.
Einstein may well have been hooked on causality. Causality is nice, it says "if A, B will follow." Predictability based on prior observation and derived predictive calculation. Where does random motion fall?
Does the creator play dice? Are we to tell the Creator what can, and cannot, be done in the game created? Probability, a certainty of the game! Rationality underlying the probability, a define certainty.
Intervention? Ridiculous! Internal influence? Most assuredly. There is a Unified Thought Theory encompassing a Unified Field Theory.
_____________________________________________________
Dr. Michael L. Brown of the Coalition of Conscience questions the position of “gay rights” as a path toward diversity. He has submitted an opinion to Christian Newswire that alludes rights for homosexuals is more akin to perversity.
Moral depravity is the true essence of so-called "diversity." As homosexuals and trans-sex nuts march in international "gay pride" parades, displays of moral depravity are made public that might even make a New Orleans Mardi Gras parade blush (or maybe not). Homosexual rights are merely a call for individuals to normalize that which is debased in society. Medical and Psychiatric associations have given the depraved ammunition by validating these counter-culture depraved individuals and organizations. This validation has occurred even though (as of 2004 studies) there is no proof that homosexual tendencies are genetically biological. Evidently Science is taking a normalization stand RELATIVE to numbers of professed homosexuals; ergo sexual orientation (i.e. choices of physical attraction by gender) is not a mental disorder.
Secular Humanism measure ethics and morality based on the view of evolving cultural mores, not Biblical or religious standards. Secular Humanism (in which a huge amount of scientific and philosophical community gravitates) increasingly and actively portrays faith as an anachronism that is counter to what is relative to the common good of an objective society. In essence people of faith are becoming excluded from practicing Godly morality by the minority intelligentsia elite of the Western world. The depraved of the world receive validation while those endeavoring to practice a godly path are discredited as valueless.
This is a perversion of any goodness that is in a concept of "diversity." This is wrong.
Keeping the thought in mind; truth is relative, and how we view that is coloured by our individual beliefs...
So from one point of view;
An infant learns quickly that expression, not crying, necessairily, is the means by which the child's needs and desires are met. (crying just happens to be one of the first expressions newborns learn and one of the few adults hear!)
Adult humans have experimented with expression and with the suppressing of expression for thousands of years through all sorts of means including art, music and ideas on the positive side and guilt, oppression and authority on the negative.
If animals and plants are here simply to be their very best expression of their species they can be then it says to me that humans are also here to be our very best, to express our very best, to simply BE the best expression of human we can be in our own human wild abandon.
No more, no less, no judgment required. Animals aren't subjected to judgment in their world, no guilt!
So if you're sad and that's your best - that's great, similar if you're happy. Neither state is good or bad, they simply are, with no need for distinction. No label required - no drama!
So if that's natural for humans - expression - then why do so few people put any effort into it? It is what people crave, it is what people deny themselves of - expression...
Shit - could it be that simple - the meaning of life?
Maybe it could!
My garden implies that might just be it!
And the rest is an illusion we actively participate in! All the other "rules" and expectations that we think we should live up to are a sham if we aren't expressing who we are, what we think and what we feel.
Walk through your life achieving what society says you should achieve and your life can still feel empty and without meaning. Live your life expressing your heart's feelings and desires (the REAL stuff, not the bitching and whining!) and sharing that with others in your world in whatever way you can and life is a daily joy and adventure, just as it's naturally designed to be!
That's what the garden is teaching me.
Showing 1 - 5. [ Next ]