By Congressman Emanuel Cleaver, II D-MO
Yesterday, the House and Senate agreed overwhelmingly to pass bipartisan legislation to provide a quick boost to a struggling economy. With a unanimous vote, we sent the stimulus package to the President, who has already agreed to sign it into law.
The centerpiece of this legislation is a direct tax rebate to individuals of up to $600 and households up to $1200. Over 2 million Missouri households will receive refunds averaging $913. These rebates, however, are very unique. For the first time in our history the poorest of the poor will be targeted to receive rebates. Previous stimulus packages only went to those who owed taxes last year. Many of the poor, those on fixed income or living on social security or disability do not normally owe taxes. This package is different. Rebates will be phased out as income increase.
I am very pleased to have been part of the group to argue vigorously that any stimulus package had to be directed at lower income levels. I believe we injected some fundamental fairness into what could have been an upper class money maker.
Right now, targeting our nation's poor is critical, because they are feeling the economic downturn far more than anyone else in the nation. Last year, the price of food rose nearly five percent, but real weekly earnings rose under one percent for the year. I'm just a Methodist preacher, but when prices are up nearly five percent and earnings are barely up one percent, it means the money you earn isn't going as far as it used to. For those only earning a bare minimum wage, their paychecks are not going far at all.
The stimulus package will cost $168 billion. Yes billion with a "B." While I am extremely concerned about borrowing more money, frankly our economy desperately needs the jolt. Without this drastic measure, the world's economic health is in peril.
Many of you have heard me speak on the dangers of our government's spending and how terrible our deficit has grown. Some may be asking, "Why is this different?" Just like each of our personal budgets, our nation has good debt and bad debt. Good debt is borrowing for a house or college, things that have long term beneficial effects. Bad debt is borrowing money to buy a Big Mac. This stimulus package is "good debt." It provides a way to help shallow out the economic downturn which is a sound and positive investment in our future. By making it lean and aggressive, Congress, for once, resisted the urge to make a spending bill a fast food feast.
The bottom line is this package will put hundreds of dollars into the hands of more than 130 million American families including seniors and disabled veterans - who will spend it and help reinvigorate the economy. It will help struggling families by offering a rebate of $300 for each child and will expand financing opportunities for Americans in danger of losing their homes because of the mortgage crisis. This $168 billion federal investment in the economy is projected to create 500,000 jobs by the end of the year.
I believe this stimulus package will help, but it will not be the magic pill that cures our ailing economy. To be perfectly honest, we may be too late to pull completely out of what, hopefully, will be only a mild recession. Our economy has been neglected and abused over the last seven years, but I applaud Speaker Pelosi, Chairman Charlie Rangel of the Ways and Means Committee, Senate Leaders and the President for making this effort in good faith. Let us all hope it has the desired effect.
Many of you probably have questions regarding the stimulus package and how it will affect you. While it will be slightly different for every household, here are answers to some of the questions I hear most often.
Q: How much is the refund?
A: It depends on your income and tax liability, but it ranges from $300 to $600 for individuals and from $600 to $1,200 for married couples filing jointly.
Anyone eligible for a refund would receive an additional $300 for each child 17 or younger who lived with them for more than half of 2007.
For example, a married couple with two children could receive up to $1,800. There is no limit on the number of children who could earn their parents a refund.
A worksheet from the Treasury Department with various examples of different family situations can be found on my website www.house.gov/cleaver. Simply click on the link marked "Stimulus Package."
Q: Who is eligible for a refund?
A: A minimum of $3,000 in earned income in 2007 is required, even if no federal income tax was paid. Earned income means income from a job or self-employment. The refund phases out for higher-income taxpayers.
To get a refund, you must file a 2007 tax return, even if you don't owe tax, so the IRS can know where to send your check.
If you had no earned income but you paid taxes - perhaps on Social Security or pension benefits or investment income - you could receive a refund of your 2007 tax liability up to $600 (single) or $1,200 (married).
If you had no earned income and no tax liability in 2007, you would get no refund. However, more than 20 million senior citizens living off Social Security -- as well as about 250,000 disabled veterans and spouses of deceased disabled veterans - WILL BE ELIGIBLE for the rebate checks.
Q: At what income level does the refund phase out?
A: Singles with more than $75,000 in adjusted gross income and couples with more than $150,000 would lose some or all of their refund. (Adjusted gross income includes income from all sources; it is usually the biggest line on your tax return.)
Q: When would we get checks?
A: Now that the bill has passed Congress, checks could start going out within 60 days of the President's signature and it would take about 10 weeks to send out the "lion's share."
Start looking for your check to arrive in the mail in May. Remember, you must file a 2007 tax return by April 15 to receive a stimulus refund.

Refund @ MindSay 
Thoughts??? Opinions???
Sunday, February 10, 2008
Details on the newly passed Stimulus Package
I have been kindof bummed out lately. I am temporarily quitting the dance thing. They are way out of my league expensive yet I do want to save some cash and get it started again. But the dance club is hasselling me about the refund for the deposit I made for the next round of lessons. I know I can dispute it on my charge card and claim "product not delivered" and win but I really do not want to do that. I just want a refund and move on from there. I have already sent them a paying customer and maybe another tomorrow night. But believe me if they fuck with me some more all bets are off. I will trash them to everyone I know and I do mean everyone.
I really like this dancing thing. I think it may be for me after all. I just can't make the lessons happen right now. I know I could soon, just not now. So I remain bummed out :(
Then I came home, and had a $4,000 check from NYU as a 'refund'. Whaaaa? My question exactly. Long story cut short, I signed a form and now one of my loans that had a crappy interest rate is goooooooooooooooooone. W0000t. I think that's a good thing.
Went to class, where Lindsey blew up my spot about crying (oooooh well). Then Mike was like 'I'll take you out to dinner'...SECOND NIGHT IN A ROW, so that means I stiiiiiiill have a coupon for a free burrito (mmmm.... Chipotle), and we ended up seeing our last night dinner date Joanna, and I finally met the famous Jaimie and she is amazing and we def went to dinner before 7 and I got home....20 minutes ago. I only excused myself when my phone rang and it was m'rents, and then as I was walking towards home, I ran into JESSE which was amaaaaaazing. Just sitting there, talking to a smoking girl. He is working at the Hall of Science, how amazing is that? What a great grad program that would be! Come to the little kiddie museum, phD student! Yesssssss.
I dunno. Tomorrow's gonna be 86 or something amazing. Yeah ... perfect.
Interesting research project - go find me the first culture who had the concept of 'zero'. It's not as easy a thing as you think, because most of what you do represents that you have something there. How do you represent zero? Freakin' cool.
I love music theory, but music history grabs me because of the anthropological side of it - the ever-changing mindset of society, reflected in the art we create. My mock-fiance and I were talking in the breakroom the other day, and somehow got on the subject of our majors. He's never seen me light up quite that fervently - I tend to get excitedly passionate about things like this.
It interests me that most of the careers I've wanted to pursue were in my mind tied with a psychological impact. I wanted to go into marine biology, yes, but I particularly wanted to work with dolphin psychology to see what impact music has on them, and see if my research could be helpful in further understanding our own psychology and how we relate to animals. It's always the minds that interest me, yet I have no interest in going into psychology, because the main direction I see that going is therapy, and that doesn't grab me the same way.
Anyway, so here's the question. My dad suggested using a different form, because I get more of a refund back (it's student-related). So, should I?
This is where my slightly weird (or so I'm told) perspective comes into play. As I see it, I don't need the money. I know, I have tuition and all that coming up. There will always be future payments to make. But at this moment, it's not a concern. Between God and my parents, I've got everything I need.
Money is a finite resource, and while I realize it's not that much, it almost feels like it's being dishonest. Taking more from the government than I should. We're not going to get into what I 'need', because, let's face it - I live at home, I won't be concerned with making my own home for at least another year, and I certainly won't be concerned with sharing my finances with anyone else for a few more years. On the other hand, the National Debt is continually rising, and funds for our arts programs are continually being cut because there isn't enough money to go around.
Is it ethically wrong of me to file the wrong form so that I'm getting a smaller refund? Isn't that kind of a deception, a different direction of fudging on one's taxes?
This isn't an issue of what I want - that's just ridiculous.
Ponder ponder ponder...
Well, if it IS the wrong form, then what I'm essentially doing is making a donation to the government and calling it paying my taxes.
Is that accurate? After all, no matter what I do here, I'm getting a refund back, it's just a question of how much. It feels like I'm going for the cushiness when I want more. I don't need more.
There's a saying that there aren't really any ethical dilemmas. We actually know what the right thing to do is, but it's not always as comfortable as we'd like. We try to pretend it's a dilemma to give our choice 'fair' swing, but we already know what the right answer is.
Fragit, I do know what the right answer is. Sigh. I just don't know if I have time to do it.
OMAHA, Neb. - ConAgra Foods Inc. told consumers to discard certain jars of Peter Pan and Great Value peanut butter after the spread was linked to a salmonella outbreak that has sickened almost 300 people nationwide.
Lids of jars with a product code beginning "2111" can be returned to ConAgra for a refund, the company said.
The salmonella outbreak, which federal health officials said Wednesday has sickened 288 people in 39 states since August, was linked to tainted peanut butter produced by ConAgra at a plant in Sylvester, Ga. How salmonella got into peanut butter is still under investigation, said Dr. Mike Lynch, an epidemiologist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
To get a refund, consumers should send lids and their names and addresses to ConAgra Foods, P.O. Box 57078, Irvine, CA 92619-7078. For more information, call (866) 344-6970.
Showing 1 - 5. [ Next ]




