Price @ MindSay 
gas
Hi Everybody,
This is my first time to Blogg. I have a question? In this economy would anyone be interested in forming
a group of persons who can not afford to buy new things but who can Barter, Trade of Exchange.
I believe in this time with high gas prices, high food costs that many persons are not able to buy the
things they need but everyone has something that other people would like to have - hence the concept
of Barter/Exchange/Trade.
Anyone else think this is a good idea?
Right now I am looking for about 800sq ft of wood flooring, and I would be willing to trade. Let me know
what you need maybe I have it.
I just saw in the news they don't see gas prices going down ever again. This really sucks.
I went to gas up, at this place called american gas, and they had a $50.00 max on the credit card.
I was abit confused, droved off. then I realized I could have swiped my cc again or use a second one to finish filling up my bmw.
oh well. I am seriously thinking of getting the honda Insight for a commuter car.
it's looks are growing on me, my coworker has one and I do like the form follows function design of the insight. the hidden rear wheels to cut thru the wind. the low co-efficient to slice thru and all the cute stuff. The tires are so small, I have to see if there are any options when it coes to replacement. They have sparkplugs unique to the car as well. Eachspark plug whole has a stamp A, B or C, so that when you get the plugs you have to get the right ones for each of the 3 cyclenders, this is prabal to have the tip point in the right directions for optimum spark. Maybe a BOSCHE Platium +4 would do the trick. it's hard to find one in CA, with prices over 4 dollars easily. and the insight doesn't come with AC by default. Another thing is weither I should go with the automatic CVT tranny or the 5 speed stick. I like driving stick but in a hybrid I fail to see the point of shifting since you're not really going to enjoy driving it in the same way you would a sporting saden. Getting an Insight with the HOV stickers would be a bonus too.
We'll have to see if I can budget one in. One more thing I see is the hybrids generally have higher mileage then normal since that is one of the purpose of buying one, for the long daily commute.
The bad news: it's because everything costs so damn much now
"Mission Accomplished" now over Five years ago.
How have you been enjoying the last 5 years
of peace and prosperity?
I found this to be an interesting read.....
By Don Robertson, The American Philosopher
We should all wince at the shocking truth here for the working poor
who at long last got a now far less than meaningless
minimum wage increase out of Congress.
When I was a twelve year old kid just starting out,
the minimum wage was a buck an hour (Thanks to Ike).
That's what I was paid for the odd jobs I could wrangle
out of my surroundings as a twelve year old kid, you know,
chump-change for the chump.
In 1962 a gallon of gasoline was 19.9 cents,
meaning for the wages I was paid for my hours' work,
I could buy five gallons of gasoline.
At $3.00 a gallon, that would mean a twelve year old kid
starting out today would need to get $15.00 an hour to meet
with this casual measure of the cost living I enjoyed in
1962 as a twelve year old. (at $4.00 that would be $20.00
in a few more years $7.00 will be $35.00 are you keeping up)
And the much more realistic economic truth is, measuring
the cost of living against the price of a gallon of gasoline
doesn't really give a gage to the effect of the economists'
and the politicians' "progress" since gasoline has not risen
anywhere near half as fast as most commodities.
In 1962 a loaf of bread was ten cents.
A quart of soda pop was a nickel.
And it cost my in-laws just $75 to pay for the
hospital birth of my wife's youngest brother.
There were no such things then as Auto Inspection Stickers,
Auto Insurance, Health Insurance, Pay Day Lenders, Credit Cards,
a State Run Lottery, or any other of a broadened host economic
vice-evils and increased expenses.
Much more progress like this, and you won't
have to worry about the price of gasoline.
For a song, you'll be able to commandeer
a human-powered rickshaw for your daily commute
just like it used to be possible to do in China.
Just hire someone's twelve year old kid to do it.
What's going on is called, slavery, or, human bondage.
It's reducing every human being and every kid to groveling
like a starving whore in the streets.
So, when one of these kids today comes up behind you
and smashes your brains in for the few measely dollars in your wallet,
understand just who and what put them up to it.
It's called progress.
First off, I want to thank those who gave me ideas... It took me awhile to finally write something, and honestly... I'm not sure if it is really that great of an argumentative essay... But it works... Here is my 5 page BLAH... Haha... Enjoy!
Textbook Tragedy
Growing up, many children dream of becoming doctors, lawyers, astronauts, teachers, and so on. As they come to the end of their high school experience though, they are rudely awakened by the possibility of never realizing their dream due to the prohibitive prices of higher education. College prices are skyrocketing out of reach for the average middle class high school graduate. Tuition fees can increase about 32% during the course of a four year degree, at a boost of approximately 8% annually. But, assuming one could conquer the extreme tuition expenses through scholarships, loans, grants and savings; let us look at another often overlooked factor of this imposing problem.
One aspect of college expenses that seems to be increasing at an exponential rate is the cost of textbooks. College textbook prices have increased at twice the rate of inflation within the last twenty years, and have followed closely behind tuition increases. This has become quite an issue for the average college-age American because, price of textbooks aside, they already struggle with being financially cleared for classes. What can be done? There are several approaches that could be taken and some are in the process at high state levels. Yet, there still remains a need for a realistic solution.
In the United States, textbook prices nearly tripled from December 1986 to December 2004. American students pay significantly more for the same book than students of other countries. Sometimes the cost difference can be half again, or even up to two thirds more in price. What is the reason for this radical difference? Could it really be that printing costs are that much more in America, or is it simply that American publishers are greedier, and their priority is profit?
At an average of every three years, publishers are putting out “new edition” textbooks and selling them for a higher price. Often times, the only updates in these versions are simple sentence changes to keep up with the culture. Unfortunately, they then stop printing the old versions, and thus the old versions become obsolete and cannot be used unless there are enough in a campus bookstore stock to prevent purchasing for a period of time.
If the purpose of the writers and publishers is to help students develop a well balanced and exceptional course of study, wouldn’t they want it to be for as many as possible to benefit our society today? If publishers reduced their production costs, so that more students could afford to purchase their products, then their profit margin would remain the same while allowing more to participate in the education benefits which they purpose to pursue. Writers and publishers need to make a living too, but why not make their products affordable to the students so that college can be within the reach of more young people?
Approximately, 70 percent of high school students attend college within two years after graduation. For the other 30 percent, cost is often their main deterring factor. The percentage of students attending college is growing because of the educational requirement for most employment positions. Only the most determined middle and lower class students push forward and struggle with the cost. Many of these are often left with daunting loan repayments for years after graduation. Although the college prices may play a big factor in this fairly large number of those who never attend, perhaps appealing to the publishers is where this battle of bills should begin.
Part of the publishers reasoning has been thought to correspond with the rising secondary markets. Internet sites are booming with buying used textbooks and reselling them to students at a lower cost. To avoid the problem of a decrease in sales, publishers print Fourth, Fifth, and even Sixth editions, so that students have to purchase the newer versions. By this, they are making the value market for used books nearly zero.
Perhaps part of a publisher’s problem is in no longer being able to sell new textbooks because of the used book sales among students and the flourishing market of used bookstore companies. Their strategy then, is if they can keep putting out new editions, they will continue to make their profit. But, with the printed copies publishers sell now, they often sell their large quantity of textbooks, and that is all the profit they make until their new edition is printed and sold.
Thus, the argument for publishers could come into account that if their books are simply being cycled around, they will never make a profit and slowly go out of business. Where would our textbook industry go? Would new text books ever be published to inform us of new information?
In August, 2005, the Government Accountability Office said students could spend up to as much as $900 a year on new textbooks and supplies. This is definitely not uncommon. It is reasonable for some textbooks to be of a fairly high cost, because there is a price to pay for the graphics and even some of the information used in the material. Also, textbooks are often printed on high quality paper, whereas a common novel is printed with a lot less cost and can be printed in mass for much less.
What options do we, as college students, have? What can the teachers do about it? Students spend a majority of their time online, so why not offer electronic textbooks online or by CD? Professor Terry Lovell, at Yavapai College said, "Textbooks are 15th century technology; we need to step into the 21st century." Lovell also commented, "If we use (online textbooks) we can save up to 50 percent, and they can update as new information comes, instead of needing to replace them."
Publishers would still make a profit by charging students to gain access to internet based materials, and the cost would go down considerably for college students, because there would be the elimination of printing costs. The problem that could be foreseen, as far as profit goes, would be students sharing the access. However, realistically, students already share textbooks in an effort to save resources. Worse yet, sometimes they don’t even purchase them because of the prohibitive prices, thus losing the educational opportunity that would be provided with access to these resources. Some schools, in an effort to accommodate lower income students, purchase a library copy of certain textbooks so that students may have access. Obviously, while this is helpful, it severely limits students’ ability to study outside of the library’s hours of operation.
Bundled textbooks are the books that come in plastic wrap and have extra material included, such as CD’s and other supplemental materials. With these simple, cheap additional items, they feel they have the right to charge a large sum more. All publishers should make unbundled books an option to students and teachers, because the bonus material is often left unused.
Publishers want to make more profit and offer other materials, but if these materials are so important, they would be used more often. Teachers should have the option to purchase them separately if they decide that the materials are important to their student’s education. But, most professors admit that the bonus material is never used in their courses.
There have been many attempts to make a difference. Students have set up petitions, taken bills to be passed to state officials, sent letters to some of the publishers, but perhaps there aren’t enough students requesting that they do their best to make textbooks as inexpensive as possible without sacrificing the educational value. Also, we need to urge them to make new editions only when it is educationally necessary. Certainly it is understandable that certain new developments in science would warrant significant changes in textbooks, but is it truly necessary to reprint an entire edition of a poetry book? Does the content change so significantly?
Some teachers request new teacher’s materials, as well as updated and attention grabbing charts. By this simple request, they are causing publishers to put out new editions which in most cases are sold with a fifty percent increase from the previous edition. They edit minor things in the textbook itself and also tend to bundle some additional materials rather than coming up with the requested information that can be sold separately.
If the current trend continues, by the time babies today enter college, they will be paying three times the current rate for college tuition. Correspondingly, college textbooks will also rise to an extremely high cost. College degrees will become more important to attain for a supportive job and high school graduates will have an even higher need to complete college. If a family waits until their child reaches their freshmen year of high school to start saving for college, they will need to make and set aside $56.12 weekly to make the same amount they would if they set aside $10 a week at birth at 4% interest to accumulate $12,663.44. This, of course, will not cover the entire cost of college, but will set a good foundation for at least their first year.
In summary, it is important to find ways to make college education less expensive. There needs to be an emphasis for college textbook prices to decrease rather than increase. Education should be valued above money, and many institutions are barely breaking even to manage this standard. Publishers can make a difference, but perhaps they need a good push. Write letters, sign petitions, or even better, become a publisher or textbook author and put an end to the madness of the outrageous expenses of education.
Bibliography:
FinAid Page, LLC; Mark Kantrowitz, Publisher. (2008). Tuition Inflation; Savings Goals. Retrieved 2008, from http://www.finaid.org/savings/tuition-inflation.phtml
Kinney, D. (2007 , May 28). Parents: It’s never too early to start saving for college. Retrieved April 2008, from http://www.fwbusinesspress.com/display.php?id=6123
Kirst, M. W., & Venezia, A. (2003). Undermining Student Aspirations. Retrieved 2008, from http://www.highereducation.org/crosstalk/ct0203/voices0203-undermining.shtml
Longley, R. (2005, August). GAO Probes College Textbook Price Increases. Retrieved April 2008, from About.com: http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/consumerawareness/a/gaobookcosts.htm
Meurer, D. (2008, March 11). Yavapai College board approves tuition increase. Retrieved April 2008, from http://www.dcourier.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&subsectionID=1&articleID=53274
The Editorial Board. (2008, April 10). Retrieved April 15, 2008, from New York Times: http://theboard.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/10/that-textbook-costs-how-much-200/
The State PIRGs. (2005, February). Retrieved April 2008, from Make Textbooks Affordable: http://www.maketextbooksaffordable.org/newsroom.asp?id2=15618
http://www.thetorquereport.com/2008/04/nextgeneration_acura_nsx_is_go.html
Not sure if that's what it's going to look like but a V10? wow.
Was hoping it would have the V6 with an electric motor to help with the torque, especially with gas prices going up. I guess if you're rich enough for this toy you can afford the $4+/gallion gas it takes.
Showing 1 - 5. [ Next ]