
Pat Robertson @ MindSay 
November 7, 2007
Pat Robertson Endorses Giuliani on Anti-Terror Cred
Earlier today, the Reverend Pat Robertson endorsed Rudy Giuliani for president, showing that the former mayor was able to win over an influential Christian conservative leader. Robertson explained,"To me, the overriding issue before the American people is the defense of our population from the bloodlust of Islamic terrorists.... We need a leader with a bold vision who is not afraid to tackle the challenges ahead."
And he acknowledged Rudy's NYC history, "Rudy Giuliani took a city that was in decline and considered ungovernable and reduced its violent crime, revitalized its core, dramatically lowered its taxes, cut through a welter of bureaucratic regulations, and did so in the spirit of bipartisanship which is so urgently needed in Washington today."
The NY Times reports that endorsement may help Giuliani "reassure Republicans who are wary of his support for abortion rights and gay rights." Robertson also said that while he did not question Giuliani about his stance on abortion, the evangelist was confident Giuliani would appoint judges "who share the judicial philosophy of John Roberts and Antonin Scalia." We can sense countless people shuddering at that statement! You can watch video of Robertson's endorsement here.
But today did not hold all good news for Giuliani: His pal and former NYPD commissioner Bernard Kerik expects to be indicted soon for charges related to accepting thousands in home renovations from a contractor who wanted a city license. Giuliani has been sticking up for Kerik, told the AP, "There were mistakes made with Bernie Kerik. But what's the ultimate result for the people of New York City? The ultimate result for the people of New York City was a 74 percent reduction in shootings, a 60 percent reduction in crime, a correction program that went from being one of the worst in the country to one that was on '60 Minutes' as one of the best in the country, 90 percent reduction of violence in the jails."
--------------------------------------------
Both of these bastards can go straight to Hell!!
_____________________________________________________
Date Line May 15, 2007
The Moral Majority founder, Rev. Jerry Falwell, has died. Next on the list, Rev Pat Robertson and James Dobson.
Granted, their departure and commencement of their existence in an appropriate place of eternal damnation shall still leave much to be undone; but at least it is a start in the correct and moral direction.
The Immoral Coalition these men have forged, with the willing and devout adherence of the perpetually ignorant, will eventually see its end. Before that time comes, we will see an attempt at the further extermination of all who prized the virtues inherent to "Wisdom, Knowledge and Understanding."
There is an ongoing blood feud, said to be between voices of good and those of evil. It is a feud which requires pain and torment in an effort to achieve survival of the species.
Hang in there. Between now and the event the earth will shake, the skies will darken and all will be wrong with the world.
In other words. Things will continue as usual, any significant major changes will be imperceptible to the media. The lies and dishonesty shall continue, America shall suffer for those who would avoid any inkling of real care for those who deserve the most care.
Face it children. The end times are upon us. They are here because the likes of Falwell, Robertson, and Dobson have proclaimed it so.
The end times are here because we would rather devote our limited resources to the killing Islamists than to the care of our hungry, sick and homeless.
Of vital importance in the work of Falwell, Robertson, and Dobson is to ensure the mental and physical destruction of a generation of our most productive young; and to do so at a time when the policies of outsourcing threaten America with FOURTH World status.
FOURTH World status? That is where we are dependent upon the Third World for everything; for the basic food on our tables; for the tables upon which to place our food; for the workers physically and mentally able to perform the work of any society.
We are, thanks in major part to Falwell, Robertson, Dobson and their ilk, destined to destruction. At least most of you are.
Are you having fun yet? Look for a new HORROR before year end.
(A HEADS UP) Why are the last two weeks in July significant?
_____________________________________________________
Evangelical broadcaster Pat Robertson said Tuesday that God has told him that a terrorist attack on the United States would cause a "mass killing" late in 2007. "I'm not necessarily saying it's going to be nuclear," he said during his news-and-talk television show "The 700 Club" on the Christian Broadcasting Network. "The Lord didn't say nuclear. But I do believe it will be something like that." Robertson said God told him about the impending tragedy during a recent prayer retreat. God also said, he claims, that major cities and possibly millions of people will be affected by the attack, which should take place sometime after September.
What an asshole! And why is God speaking to an evil, blood diamond loving, old bastard like Pat anyway?
Y'know what I think? I don't think that God is speaking to Pat at all, nope I think "Pickled Pat" been carrying on a 40 year kaffeeklatsch with Satan.
His actual words were in regard to Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. He said, “You know, I don’t know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we’re trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it. It’s a whole lot cheaper than starting a war, and I don’t think any oil shipments will stop.”
He then went on to say, “We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability. We don’t need another $200 billion war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator. It’s a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with.”
The Associated Press dared to accuse dear Mr. Robertson, an honorable man of God, of calling for the death of a fellow human being.
Rightfully outraged by this horrendous stretch of truth, Robertson defended himself by saying, "I didn't say 'assassination.’ I said our special forces should ’take him out.' 'Take him out' could be a number of things including kidnapping."
You're right, Patter. 'Taking out' could mean a lot of thing, and I suppose kidnapping isn't a crime or a sin. But that isn't the point. You also said, "if he thinks we’re trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it." It pretty hard to misconstrue that. That means you think we should assassinate him. There's no way around it.
You can't blame the media when the remarks you made were caught on videotape. Maybe you should pray to God for a brain. Or ask your followers to "contribue" their hard earned money for one.
This may seem like a funny thing for me to write about... after all, you all know me... I'm the conservative, Christian type, etc... but this guy is really ticking me off right now. I had originally intended to make this post a couple days ago... but alas, our campus internet has been down all weekend, and so I've had a couple days to think about it, and it arrives... now.
As many of you probably know, Pat Robertson is at it again. A couple days ago, he made the statement that perhaps Ariel Sharon's current condition is the result of divine retribution for "dividing God's land". Needless to say... there are some people not too happy to hear him say that. Including me. You see, my problem with Pat Robertson is not that he suggested that we should assassinate the president of Venezuela ("Do not murder" Exodus 20:13 [NLT]). It is also not that he suggested that Ariel Sharon is essentially being killed by God ("He does not want anyone to perish," 2 Peter 3:9 [NLT]). Granted, both of these things are terrible to say and should not have been said (Mr. Robertson needs to learn to think before he speaks, I think). My problem with Pat Robertson isn't even that he claims to know something about Judaism and "divinding God's land" (I learned a lot about this topic last quarter from a Jewish Rabbi who helped teach one of my classes. Apparently, many Jews believe that just because God promised them the land currently called Israel doesn't mean that no one else would be living there with them. At the time the covenant was made, they were lucky to make it there at all.). The root of my problem with Mr. Robertson is this: Pat Robertson seems to think that he speaks for a majority of Christians. I don't know for sure that he doesn't, but I can tell you this: he doesn't speak for me, and he doesn't speak for 99% of the other Christians I know. It's easy enough to see that these eccentric extremist ideas that he expounds nightly on The 700 Club are in direct opposition to the Word of God, yet he portrays them as if they are absolute truth, spoken by God himself. I find it hard to believe that one man would suddenly be given authority to speak on behalf the entire Christian religion (much less God Himself), and even if he was, I find it hard to believe that these hateful messages are what our Creator wants to say to His world.
The unfortunate thing about it is that many non-Christians latch on to these kinds of statements and ideas and associate them with all of Christianity, when most of us don't agree with such statements at all. Fundamentalists like Mr. Robertson always seem to grab the public spotlight and incite the commotion, while those of us in the dorms, offices, and churches of America are left to try to explain their words and actions to an unbelieving world ("...no, I swear, that's not what I think... that's just what he says... all Christians aren't like that").
So in conclusion... Mr. Robertson, if you're out there... please stop speaking before you think, especially if your words could be traced back to the faith I practice, and therefore, me. It would do Christianity a lot of good.
Showing 1 - 5. [ Next ]
hugo chavez



