Mob @ MindSay 
Eligiblity personal loans
one year with present company or three years work experience 5 year for non listed cos - ( depends on banks to bank & customer profile )
Docs required
(1) Photograph
(2) 2 Latest Payslips ( min take home - 20K + )
(3) Last 3 – 6 months bank statements (net statement URL required)
(4) Address Proof (Ration Card, Passport, utility bill, Driving licence, Rental
agreement, Phone Bill, Voters ID, Letter from your organizations HR )
(should reflect the current residential address)
(5 I D Proof (PAN card, Passport, Voters ID, Driving licence)
(6) Signature Proof (PAN card, Passport, Driving License,
Bank verification)
(7) appointment letter copy
(8) appointment , releaving letter and experience letter from previous company
(9) original resi proof ( batchelors - land line /own house/post paid mob bill … etc )
(10) post paid tel bill
(11) qualification certificate copy
( depends on banks to bank & customer profile )
EMI PER LAKH
Months 12 24 36 48 60
10% 8792 4615 3227 2537 2125
11% 8838 4661 3274 2585 2174
12% 8885 4708 3322 2834 2225
13% 8932 4754 3370 2683 2276
14% 8979 4802 3418 2733 2327
15% 9026 4849 3467 2783 2379
16% 9073 4897 3516 2834 2432
17% 9121 4944 3566 2886 2485
18% 9168 4993 3615 2938 2540
19% 9216 5041 3666 2990 2594
20% 9264 5090 3717 3043 2650
21% 9312 5139 3768 3097 2706
22% 9360 5188 3819 3151 2762
23% 9408 5238 3871 3205 2819
24% 9456 5287 3924 3260 2877
25% 9505 5337 3976 3316 2936
Months 12 24 36 48 60
loansinbangalore@yahoo.co.in
http://loansinbangalore.googlepages.com/
http://video.yahoo.com/watch/3893555/10605298
| The Real Meaning of the Right to Vote |
By Alex Epstein
FrontPageMagazine.com | Tuesday, November 04, 2008
Every Election Day, politicians, intellectuals, and activists propagate a seemingly patriotic but utterly un-American idea: the notion that our most important right--and the source of America’s greatness--is the right to vote. According to former President Bill Clinton, the right to vote is “the most fundamental right of citizenship”; it is “the heart and soul of our democracy,” says Senator John McCain.
Such statements are regarded as uncontroversial--but consider their implications. If voting is truly our most fundamental right, then all other rights--including free speech, property, even life--are contingent on and revocable by the whims of the voting public (or their elected officials). America, on this view, is a society based not on individual rights, but on unlimited majority rule--like ancient Athens, where the populace, exercising “the most fundamental right of citizenship,” elected to kill Socrates for voicing unpopular ideas--or modern-day Zimbabwe, where the democratically elected Robert Mugabe has seized the property of the nation’s white farmers and brought the nation to the verge of starvation--or Germany in 1932, when the people democratically elected the Nazi Party, including future Chancellor Adolph Hitler. Would anyone dare claim that America is thus fundamentally similar to these regimes, and that it is perfectly acceptable to kill controversial philosophers or to exterminate six million Jews, so long as it is done by popular vote?
Contrary to popular rhetoric, America was founded, not as a “democracy,” but as a constitutional republic--a political structure under which the government is bound by a written constitution to the task of protecting individual rights. “Democracy” does not mean a system that holds public elections for government officials; it means a system in which a majority vote rules everything and everyone, and in which the individual thus has no rights. In a democracy, observed James Madison in The Federalist Papers, “there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention [and] have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property.”
The right to vote derives from the recognition of man as an autonomous, rational being, who is responsible for his own life and who should therefore freely choose the people he authorizes to represent him in the government of his country. That autonomy is contradicted if a majority of voters is allowed to do whatever it wishes to the individual citizen. The right to vote is not a sanction for a gang to deprive other individuals of their freedom. Rather, because a free society requires a certain type of government, it is a means of installing the officials who will safeguard the individual rights of each citizen.
What makes America unique is not that it has elections--even dictatorships hold elections--but that its elections take place in a country limited by the absolute principle of individual freedom. From our Declaration of Independence, which upholds the “unalienable rights” of every individual, among which are “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” to our Constitution, whose Bill of Rights protects freedom of speech and the freedom of private property, respect for individual liberty is the essence of America--and the root of her greatness.
Unfortunately, with each passing Election Day, too many Americans view elections less as a means to protect freedom, and more as a means to win some government favor or handout at the expense of the liberty and property of other Americans. Our politicians promise, not to protect the basic rights spelled out in the Declaration and the Constitution, but to violate the rights of some people in order to benefit others. Today’s politicians want capital for failing banks--by forcing non-failing Americans to pay for them; subsidies for farmers--by forcing non-farmers to pay for them; prescription drugs for the elderly--by forcing the non-elderly to pay for them; housing for the homeless--by forcing the non-homeless to pay for it. The more “democratic” our government becomes, the more we cannibalize our liberty, ultimately to the detriment of all.
This Election Day, therefore, we should reject those who wish to reduce our republic to mob rule. Instead, we should vote for those, to whatever extent they can be found, who are defenders of the essence of America: individual freedom.
Alex Epstein is a writer for the Ayn Rand Institute (ARI) in Irvine, California, which promotes the philosophy of Ayn Rand. Send comments to reaction@aynrand.org.
I was hoked on this game from the first time I played it, years ago. The new version is not quite as good as the old, because allthough they released new cards (Turncoat) they failed to put an descriptions about what the cards do on them nor did they include 'Cheat Sheets'.
The rules are still as fast paced and the cards are still as lethal (for those who know the game, I found out first hand just how nasty the Safe House/St Valentines Day Massacre combination is..... REPETEDLY)
I knew that QUGS was going to be hard on my wallett.
Have a good one.
I told you I went to Weert right? Let me explain more. I am following the school of journalism. And we have different projects. The first project was called New & Information. The purpose was to introduce journalism to us. Pretty fun. We learn to write small newsmessages. The small ones became bigger in the second project. It was called inland country. There you was like a newspaper redaction from a small regional newspaper. We got the newspaper 'Het Friesch Dagblad'. So we had to search for news that belonged there. And we need to write reports about events and newsitems. Also pretty fun. Then the third project was called City. We need to make interviews there. We got the city Weert. But I will get back to that in a second. First I will go on. The fourth and last project is called Media-Orientation Forgein Country's. In Dutch that's Media-Orientatie Buitenland. We name it MOB. In MOB we get introductions in television, radio, press-agency's and stuff like that. But we also go to a forgein city. And we go to...Paris. Some of us are excited, others aren't happy about it. Personally I think we got lucky cause we also could have drawn other cities that were worse then Paris. We still don't know if we go. I hope so.
Well back too Weert. That's the city we need to go too. It's pretty far from were I live so it's a long time travell. And in the beginning the group wasn't always a group. But luckly we became a group. At least from my point of view. Later Fallon came with the group, cause something went wrong with her stuff. Anyways. The point of this project was learning the interview. I first interviewed Paul Lempens from the Socialistic Party (a politic Partij), then Rene Verheggen (Weert Lokaal). Yesterday I had two more interview. One with Ad Molenaars, he's part of the direction of a school and one with Fieke Kuntz - De Bruin. She won a ribbon, because of doing good community-work. So I interviewed them. The difference between when I interviewed Lempens and when I interviewed Molenaars is big. And now the project is almost finished. Tests are coming up. And MOB also. And then it's all over. I hope it will work. But I am at least glad I don't have to go to Weert anymore. And Paris then? But that's only an entire week, so a week there and "c'est tout". No problems there. I am curious. Curious what Paris is gonna give me and what Weert has given me.
