
Liar @ MindSay 
And to make things worse, when I finally take the leap for help, it's only going to make things worse. Because then everyone will learn the truth, and the truth hurts. It's going to stab a wound so deep into most people who know me it's pretty much going to be the single most traumatizing event of my life, that is if I even survive it. Just thinking about it now is enough to make me sick again...
I need to be vaccinated from myself.
Click Here To Escape
In Case Of Teacher,
Kids, Spouse, or Boss
Hi Everybody,
OK as all of you know I never post anything that is even the least bit political or controversial… yeah right!
OK for some time now I’ve been hearing pole-iticians of the Democratic persuasion, most notably that Muslim loving Nancy Polise, old cut-run & surrender Harry Reed, and that lying ass mother-fucking John Murtha, running off at the fricking mouth, and shouting shit like, “We Wont Be SWIFT-BOATED Again!”
You know… for what passes as leaders of this nation those mother-fuckers sure are ignorant Boo.
I mean come on now… don’t any of those pompous jack asses realize that to be “Swift-boated” means to be caught in a bold faced lie…, like that fricking idiot, John Kerry, was?
Don’t those fricking idiots realize that the end result of being “Swift-boated” is having your lies made public… again like that fricking idiot, John Kerry’s lies were?
swiftboat
To bravely expose the lies and manipulations of a powerful person seeking to achieve self promotion based on a falsified personal history and thereby prevent the success of his or her deception.
I don’t guess that they do. Anyway, I found this *pointing down* and blognapped it for your reading pleasure.
It would seem that her thighness, Bitchary Clinton, is the latest casualty of swift-boating, and it was a fucking comedian, with no political ax to grind, who was traveling with her on that infamous day of bullet dodging that nailed her nasty lying ass… hum? I wonder if Sinbad is a Democrat… do any of you know Boo?
HILLARY: SWIFTBOATED!
Wed Mar 26, 7:57 PM ET
Hillary is being "swiftboated"!
She claimed that she came under sniper fire when she visited in Bosnia in 1996, but was contradicted by videotape showing her sauntering off the plane and stopping on the tarmac to listen to a little girl read her a poem.
Similarly, John Kerry's claim to heroism in Vietnam was contradicted by 264 Swift Boat Veterans who served with him. His claim to having been on a secret mission to Cambodia for President Nixon on Christmas 1968 was contradicted not only by all of his commanders -- who said he would have been court-martialed if he had gone anywhere near Cambodia -- but also the simple fact that Nixon wasn't president on Christmas 1968.
In Hillary's defense, she probably deserves a Purple Heart about as much as Kerry did for his service in Vietnam.
Also, unlike Kerry, Hillary acknowledged her error, telling the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review: "I was sleep-deprived, and I misspoke." (What if she's sleep-deprived when she gets that call on the red phone at 3 a.m., imagines a Russian nuclear attack and responds with mutual assured destruction? Oops. "It proves I'm human.")
The reason no one claims Hillary is being "swiftboated" is that the definition of "swiftboating" is: "producing irrefutable evidence that a Democrat is lying." And for purposes of her race against matinee idol B. Hussein Obama, Hillary has become the media's honorary Republican.
In liberal-speak, only a Democrat can be swiftboated. Democrats are "swiftboated"; Republicans are "guilty." So as an honorary Republican, Hillary isn't being swiftboated; she's just lying.
Indeed, instead of attacking the people who produced a video of Hillary's uneventful landing in Bosnia, the mainstream media are the people who discovered that video.
I've always wondered how a Democrat would fare being treated like a Republican by the media. Now we know.
It's such fun watching liberals turn on the Clintons! The bitter infighting among Democrats is especially enjoyable after having to listen to Democrats hyperventilate for months about how delighted they were to have so many wonderful choices for president.
Now liberals just want to be rid of the Clintons -- which is as close to actual mainstream thinking as they've been in years. So the media suddenly notice when Hillary "misspeaks," while rushing to make absurd excuses for much greater outrages by her opponent.
Liberals are even using the Slick Willy defense when Obama is caught fraternizing with a racist loon. When Bill Clinton was exposed as a philandering, adulterous, pathological liar, his defenders said that everybody is a philandering, adulterous, pathological liar.
And now, when B. Hussein Obama is caught in a 20-year relationship with a raving racist, his defenders scream that everybody is a racist wack-job.
In the Obama speech on race that Chris Matthews deemed "worthy of Abraham Lincoln," B. Hussein Obama defended Wright's anti-American statements, saying:
"For the men and women of Rev. Wright's generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table."
So in the speech the media are telling us is on a par with the Gettysburg Address, B. Hussein Obama casually informed us that even blacks who seem to like white people actually hate our guts.
First of all: Watch out the next time you get your hair cut by a black barber over the age of 50.
Second, Rev. Wright's world wasn't segregated.
And third, what about Wright's wanton anti-Semitism? All the liberals (including essence-besplattered Chris Matthews) have accepted Obama's defense of Wright and want us to understand Wright's "legitimate" rage over his painful youth in segregated America.
But the anti-Semitic tone of Wright's sermons is as clear as his rage against the United States. Rev. Wright calls Israel a "dirty word" and a "racist country." He denounces Zionism and calls for divestment from Israel.
In addition to videos of Rev. Wright's sermons, Obama's church also offers for sale sermons by Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, whom Rev. Wright joined on a visit to Moammar Gadhafi in Libya in 1984. Just last year, Obama's church awarded Farrakhan the Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Trumpeter Award, saying Farrakhan "truly epitomized greatness."
What, pray tell, is the legitimate source of Wright's anti-Semitism? I believe Brother Obama passed over that issue entirely in his "conversation," even as he made the obligatory bow to Israel's status as one of our "stalwart allies." Why does crazy "uncle" Wright dislike Jews?
Will liberals contend that these remarks were "taken out of context"? Maybe Wright's church was trying to say that Farrakhan isn't great when it said he "epitomized greatness." Who knows? We weren't there.
Can liberals please educate us on the "legitimate" impulses behind Rev. Wright's Jew-baiting?
OK, so now what? Well I’m hoping against hope that someone will come along who can swift-boat that chipmunk looking McCain…, and that fucking Muslim in Christian disguise Obama.
Alright, all of the material in this post is covered by some kind of ©. All of the stuff in the article is the property of the author and here’s a link *pointing down* to the original post.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucac/20080326/cm_ucac/hillaryswiftboated;_ylt=AsPl17gB58r3DzLdgJUGw3AE1vAI
All of the stuff in murple is ©’d by me… but not to worry, if you want to copy any thing in this post I don’t mind Boo.
♥ Wendy
[Edited ESN]
50902-080329-426155-21 Rate content:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Public Domain License.
When given the choice between ethical behavior and increasing profit, a corporation will choose profits every time. That answer is a no-brainer. Corporations are, in fact, legally obligated to not just maintain, but increase profits. Hindsight being 20-20, everyone pretty much agrees that NAFTA was a phenomenally stupid idea. It broke the principles of "Reaganomics" because corporations began using their welfare money to create wealth elsewhere. But that's not the issue here.
The issue is Clinton's dubious claim that she was an opponent of the agreement "from the very beginning." It takes a special kind of liar to say something that contradicts an easily-accessible mountain of evidence to the contrary. Hillary Clinton is a liar, officially, but just what kind of a liar tells lies when she undoubtedly knows she will be exposed by the journalists who covered her support of NAFTA just 15 years ago? There are only two possible answers:
1. Hillary Clinton has nothing but contempt for the American people, and feels she can lie right to their faces without consequences. Such a notion would make sense. She did sit on the board of Wal-Mart, engaging in union-busting behavior. Clinton seems to believe that her words can smooth over any past indiscretion, just like her husband believed. She has tried to smooth-over her initial support of the Iraq War and now her support of NAFTA, but the facts just don't lie. The sad thing is, people are still falling for it.
2. Hillary Clinton is a pathological liar. This physiological explanation also explains quite a bit. Pathological liars do not lie in order to get out of trouble. They lie because they can't help it, even when the truth is apparent. This would be consistent with Senator Clinton's recent statements.
This is the exact kind of behavior that gets Republicans stirred up. We have had decades of dishonesty in the White House, and now it is obvious that a Clinton White House will only serve to continue this dishonesty. If she wins the party, I will still vote for her, but only because she is George W. Bush 1.5 and John McCain is George W. Bush 2.0.
Our friends at EOPC have heard from at least three of this man's victims. Three!! And EOPC is NOT RUN by one of his victims.
Google his name. Mr. Thomas is just one of MANY online predators and sexual predators that there is legally verifiable evidence on.
This man is NOT CIA. He is a sociopath.
And the longer you protect him, the worse it will be for yourselves and others. The law will catch up to him and Thomas will face charges of bigamy and federal charges of fraud for impersonating CIA.
You could be charged with obstruction and as accomplices.
If its his money you want to keep coming, this man will not have much once he faces the law. And you might face serious charges yourselves.
Please cooperate with other victims and help yourselves and everyone involved.
~~~~~~~~~~~
A CALL FOR INFORMATION!
Nathan Ernest Burl Thomas Jr.
Male
Age : 53-54
Occupation : Retired Military (he may tell you he's CIA or Special Ops) and now does sales for a company called Ecoquest
Where he might be : Germany or Illinois or Texas USA or British Columbia or Quebec Canada
Business Website (WITH HIS PICTURE!) CLICK HERE http://www.ecoquestintl.com/dealer_home/welcome.asp?Usr=nthnthom
Work # : ( 210 ) 380 - 1684
Some of his online nicknames:
Grizzlybear90604
Suntzu7734
Bear
DZSO
T_bear1952
Some of his possible email addresses: He has been cleaning his online activities and has already closed some email addresses he used to communicate to one of his “wives” and other targets: Jandt4ever1960@aol.com
grizzlybear90604@aol.com
grizzlybear90604@yahoo.com
suntzu7734@aol.com
t_bear1952@hotmail.com
Nathan Thomas, former Chief of Housing at the 6th ASG in Germany, is one of the biggest psychos and a criminal WHO MAY HAVE COMMITTED BIGAMY
Nathan Ernest Burl Thomas Jr, aka Nathan E B Thomas Jr., date of birth 03-DEC-1952, born in Arkansas, uses the online dating sites to find vulnerable women!
His MODUS OPERANDI is virtually the same:
He tells some of his targets he is a widower from a Puerto Rican woman called Felicia, who passed away of cancer some years ago - (we sell fake Kleenex for all those who have cried hearing this fake story) – and he will fake strong sadness for this imaginary dead woman.
After some time, probably after meeting the target, he love bombs his “woman target” and starts a torrid relationship. He flies to the “victim's” country or pays for his victims to fly to meet him as well. It’s a perfect romance copied from the best love story out there.
He acts like a gentleman, fakes ethics & religiousness, helps old ladies on the street, loves children, gives money to beggars!!! He is very neat, clean and fastidious about himself. He does not like dogs or cats and will not enter a home with animals.
You will NEVER see his "house" - he will always stay in a hotel with you or in your home.
As if that weren’t enough, Nathan Thomas also implies he is a CIA operative, and Special Ops. He will say he is a paratrooper who trains "his men" for missions to Afghanistan, Iraq, etc. This is completely false. The CIA has never heard of him.
Spends a lot of money, used to drive a BMW 850 while in Germany and always stayed at Hotel suites.
He offers women expensive gifts, generally gives laptops (HE KEYLOGS THEM!!! so he can track your every move!).
There’s also ANOTHER WIFE, called Marion, living in Germany, with whom he has two kids – Alina and Nathan.
He has other adult children, one of them Cindy who may be living in Texas and at least two grandsons in Germany.
This man's imagination is better than a Tom Clancy political thriller - but also PURE FICTION. He calls himself THE BLACK RIDER in his stories and he fantasizes about being a hero by cutting & pasting news stories about Al Queda to unsuspecting targets telling them he's involved in SPECIAL OPS.
He justifies his long absences by saying he's on "CIA special operations", or he is "deployed in Iraq." To some targets, he also says he is in Afhganistan.
The truth is that he goes from one wife/family or girlfriend to another. Georgine thinks he goes away on business for his company when he goes to stay with another wife. When he goes back to Georgine, the other wife thinks he is back in Iraq, and so on… or on a "secret mission"...
He takes explicit photos and makes porn videos with his targets, as well as asking some of his wives/ girlfriends to take sexual pictures & videos - saying they are personal, just for him (LOL) - and then may be sold by him to porn websites.
There are reasons to believe his brothers may be his accomplices, and also someone in Germany – he communicates with at least one woman named Isabel in Europe. What their relationship is, is anyone's guess.
He appears to be a SERIAL CON MAN WITH WIVES, GIRLFRIENDS AND POSSIBLE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES IN MANY COUNTRIES.
It’s also suspected he was been deported from some country in Europe while he was active military.
He has a company “Thomas Special Services, LLC” at:
591417 Encino Park
San Antonio, TX 78259,
which appears to be a cover of possible criminal activity.
He also does business with Ecoquest International.
Nathan Thomas IS NOT A CIA operative. He is just a retired military and was the Chief of Housing in the 6th ASG during 2002/2004 and also dealt with private rentals in Southern Gemany.
Thomas is aware that people are on to him and has been frantically cleaning his online activities, erasing things and has already closed some email addresses he used to communicate with his “wives” and other targets. He has called or contacted some and threatened them saying that the "CIA is angry" with them. These emails may not work:
Jandt4ever1960@aol.com
grizzlybear90604@aol.com
grizzlybear90604@yahoo.com
suntzu7734@aol.com
He uses several nicknames like Grizzlybear, Suntzu, DSZO, Bear, "T" or T_Bear (they may have slight variations as well)
IF YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION WRITE TO: Cyberpaths@gmail.com and it will be passed along to law enforcement in the US, Canada and Europe.

http://www.thelangleyflyer.com/articles/2007/09/14/news/top_stories/top04.txt
http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123067382
http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/story.php?id=131925&ac=PHnws
http://newsminer.com/arcticsentry/20070914.pdf
http://www.parksmagazine.org/tcnpf/2007fall/?pg=38
http://www.eielson.af.mil/news/story_print.asp?id=123067449
http://www.eielson.af.mil/news/story_print.asp?id=123067841
http://www.aerotechnews.com/Bullseye/Bullseye_091407.pdf
http://www.armyairforces.com/forum/m_130700/tm.htm
http://parksmagazine.org/tcnpf/2007fall/?pg=36
This is typical of a malignant narcissist - to hitch their stars to something that makes them look good. Of course then Doug the predator can show all these links to people and say "see, I am a good guy. EOPC was wrong!!" Additionally, they post everywhere they can in hopes to 'drown out' the truth.
http://caliber.ucpress.net/doi/pdf/10.1525/tph.2006.28.2.toc
http://www.armyairforces.com/forum/m_69157/tm.htm
By the way, in one photo on a link, Beckstead photoshopped it to make himself LOOK THINNER!! See below and look at the lines of the suit and compare with the photo at the top of this post.

This is his way and the embarrassed, determined Air force Base in Anchorage, Alaska's way of attempting to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. Making Beckstead appear like the respectable and determined man he is obviously NOT. This is Beckstead's way of saving face to those who know nothing of his double life and his cruelty and disrespect towards those vulnerable women he preyed on online and setting him up to look like a 'good man' so he can continue his online predatory antics. (Clive, J/Gridney/ YidwithLid, Thomas, Dorsky... all did the same sort of 'damage control'! It's classic)
Yet another of Beckstead's predatory emails to one of his targets:
On 2/5/06, Doug Beckstead dog_driver@xxx.com
wrote:
I have tried to treat you with nothing but openness and honesty through everything. I have not lied about anything with you. (GAG US!!)
As for my wife not wanting sex, well, I was down there for a month over Christmas and never once had sex. It's just something I've come to expect, or not to expect for that matter. (and you are sharing MARITAL INFORMATION with a Stranger!? J/ Gridney/ YidwithLid did this with Target #2 also. ZERO appropriate boundaries with a cyberpath.)
I would write more here tonight, but I tore a muscle in my forearm (right in front of my elbow) lifting weights on Thursday afternoon. I really overdid it. Typing is aggrevating it. (Besides having cybersex and answering all my other targets really did my arm in, huh?)
Cheers!
Me (ME ME ME ME ME!!)
We know Beckstead went to EOPC and MINIMIZED his abuse and said it was all a "game" and that his victims "knew what" they were getting into. Don't buy this!! Other predators we profiled tried it too. Dorsky, J/ Gridney/ YidwithLid, Hicks, Clive. Nathan Thomas, in fact, told his victims it was THEIR FAULT for "not standing by him!" Please don't make us laugh! This is projection, blameshifting and narcissistic abuse. Ed Hicks to this day, swears he is writing a book about the TRUTH! (kinda like O.J.) and he will sue all the people (police, D.A.s, private investigators, ex-wives, ex-girlfriends, newspaper reporters and T.V. shows - all who did their homework!) who 'smeared his good name.' Can't smear what was never good, Hicks!
And all the posts and proclamations of being a good guy or a family man ("J/ Gridney/ YidwithLid" does this too on his new site all the time apparently) are to make the exposure of his predatory antics seem like an anomaly - or "just a scorned woman." Readers, how many times do we hear this tired song? And we know better! Beckstead even has the National Parks Service shilling for him now: CLICK HERE
But in these emails below you can see what a mean-spirited, coniving, hollow man Beckstead really is. (THESE ARE VERIFIED EMAILS - NOT ALTERED IN ANY WAY OTHER THAN TO REMOVE NAMES & PERSONAL INFORMATION - our comments are in purples)
From: dog_driver@XXXX.com
To: XX@XXX.net
Subject: Good Evenin'
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:32:08 -0800
Now, to get to your questions ... as for my comment about ("You know when you said "you don't know what is going to happen", what did you mean by that exactly? Do you still hope that we will meet, and get to do everything we have spoken of? Do you still hold that true?") What I meant by that is that I don't have a crystal ball that holds all the answers for me. I cannot predict what may happen next month let alone next year or five years down the road. However, that does not mean that I want, or expect, anything to change between you and I. I value our relationship very, very much. It was hard not getting messages from you over the last week and I was really happy to get the ones that explained what was happening. I hope more than anything that some day we will eventually be able to meet, in person. Beyond that, I don't know what will happen. So, we just have to keep the good thoughts going. I have not been trying to "pull back" or anything like that. That's why I made the comment about staying in the background. I would much rather be out "front and center" but if things happen, just remember, I'll always be back there and will respond to your questions, e-mails, etc. (GAG US WITH YOUR B.S. Beckstead! And you have the nerve to say it was all a GAME and your victim KNEW WHAT SHE WAS GETTING INTO??)
As for the questions about "where does my new job leave us," well, as far as I'm concerned we're still going to be able to e-mail, talk on occasion, and send packages back and forth. If I find out that something was sent and wasn't received, then there will be hell to pay for it, especially if it doesn't show up within a reasonable length of time. We'll be able to talk from time to time as well, just like we do now. (When Beckstead needs a narcissistic fix or to get his jollies by abusing you & twisting your mind)
I don't expect anything to change. But, be prepared that when I get deployed there may be long periods of time when you won't hear from me. I don't know what the e-mail situation will be from wherever I could end up. I think I explained to you that I could go to Baghdad or Afghanistan for as long as four months every two years. It's all part of my job. But, I will let you know about anything that comes up well in advance. I think they've got a rotation schedule so I'll know well in advance when I'm going and to where. It will be just like when I go out to the Yukon now and can't plug my computer into a spruce tree to send e-mails. (At Beckstead's weight we sincerely doubt he'd be deployed anywhere but Weight Watchers!! What is it with fake military? Thomas, Haberman, Cafasso & Barber were all fake military!)
The three trips I mentioned that I have coming up over the next two months before I head south are next week (beginning tomorrow morning) to Anchorage. I'll be checking my e-mail from there. Then the week after, I'll leave on Friday to fly out to Eagle, take a boat down the Yukon on Saturday to Coal Creek for a "dedication" on Sunday, back to Eagle on Monday via boat, and then spend Tuesday in Eagle doing research (actually I plan on relaxing and enjoying some time on the river -- very little work related) and fly back to Fairbanks on Wednesday. (Aren't you popular?? NOT!!)
Then, the last trip will begin on August 29th (or sooner if they finish the first half of their mission first) I will be going out to the B-24 with the team from JPAC to recover the remains of the pilot. I got word today that I will be accompanying the team for the mission. I'm really psyched about that. The mission plans are to be onsite for two weeks (until September 12th). I think we'll find what we're looking for a lot sooner and might be out earlier than planned, but who knows what may happen. So, that will be the end of my "bush time" with the NPS.
I also found out today that (1) the operations manager in Eagle is still really against the project for God knows what reasons, something about "wilderness" bullshit or something; and (2) our superintendent has already made his mind up that the project is going to happen and the NPS will be supporting it. I'm thinking that when I'm out in Eagle I just may put the ops manager on the spot and pointedly ask her why she's so against the mission. And when I do it, I may just be wired too (wearing a concealed recording device). I'd really like to see her squirm for a while. When I leave the NPS and move over to the Air Force I am already planning on submitting a request, under what we call the "Freedom of Information Act," for all the documentation and communication between our office in Fairbanks and the office in Eagle, including e-mails, phone logs, notes, etc. that relate to this project. The Freedom of Information Act is something that our government passed quite a while ago (30 or 40 years ago) that allows citizens to request government documents relating to specific issues of concern. As long as they don't fall under some very strict areas that they can be deemed "classified" (ongoing law enforcement actions, containing person information, or relating to national security) they agency is required by law to release the documents to the requesting individual. And, even if they do contain sensitive information, there are still ways that they must be released with names, etc. being blacked out. On one hand I'm going to do it just to piss the NPS off, but I'm also going to do it because I intend to discuss the lack of support on the part of the NPS for the mission in my book. (Do they know this? And since when is Beckstead - James Bond?)
As for my book, I'm actually into writing it now. I started one of the latter chapters the other day. I'm writing about my trip to the site in 2004. I will likely include the information about going back to the site in 2005 with XXX (the nephew of the crew chief) and XXXX and XXXX (the survivor ). But, I'm also thinking about giving the trip with the XXXX's its own chapter. We'll see how it goes. Overall, my research on the B-24 and my forthcoming book, will all be going with me. I have come way too far to abandon it and I know that no one else would be able to put the same feeling into it down the road. And, I feel that I owe it to the crew and their families to finish it.
I know that XXX is getting excited about things with the baby. I think he's also getting nervous about the job and going back down to Idaho. I'm sure things will work out, but I too would like to have some answers finalized so things go smoothly. Unfortunately, right now, the longer it takes, the more an airline ticket is going to cost to get him down there. I know he's been saving up his money from his job so he's got the money, but I'd still like to be able to see him save some of it. In the long run, I really want to have them come back up to Anchorage. I think everything will be a lot better for everyone concerned if they do. We'll see how things play out.
XXX is doing fine down in Ketchikan. She's had a girlfriend from high school visiting her for the last week and a half. She brought her little boy down with her and the three of them have had a blast. XXX and XXXX went home today so XXX is on her own again. Justin still has six or seven weeks to go on his base confinement so it's going to be lonely, but she's going to do fine. We've even toyed with the idea of her coming up to Anchorage for a visit for a while. We'll see what happens. Actually, I'm really looking forward to meeting XX, their pup. From everything that XXX says about her, she sounds like a really cool dog. And almost too smart for her own good! She's been a little jealous about having XXXX around the house, but they soon warmed up to each other. XXX found it was a lot of fun to take his crackers and mash them on the hardwood floor. Sadie would come running over and "bark-uum" them up for him.
I'm sure that XXX is going to miss him as much as XXX is going to miss having XXX around for the company. (again, Beckstead was charged with alleged 'hassling' of children. Never convicted but where there's smoke...)
I'm sure that while XXXX is alone right now she'll be e-mailing xxxxxx more. Tonight she said that she really had fun with the past few that they've exchanged. I guess they're finding more and more in common now.
Well, my back is really sore tonight. (ME ME ME ME ME!!)
I think I should close this epistle and go stretch out on the couch for a while. I'm hoping to get up really early tomorrow and heading south. XXX wants to go see the third X-Men movie. It's playing at a theater in Anchorage where you can actually get food and drinks to take into the theater. Not like the usual movie going munchies of popcorn and candy, but things like homemade pizzas, nachos, big pictures of soda, and my favorite, beer! It's a late show tomorrow night so it could be a lot of fun. There is also a big gun show going on in Anchorage this weekend that I would like to go see. It's where a lot of people are selling guns, parts of guns, accessories for guns, and other outdoor related things. I'll bet xxxxx would have a blast at it! There is one up here in Fairbanks twice a year, but for the most part, there isn't much to it and everyone has things overpriced by at least 50%. I like to go to pick up an occasional accessory (ammo boxes, etc) but I rarely buy anything. I've seen a couple of guns that I would have liked to have picked up (bought) but didn't have the money at the time. Mostly I go to look to see if something strikes my fancy. (HIS fancy? Like women online to mess with their minds & hearts? does THAT strike your fancy too, Beckstead??)
I'm sure glad that you're feeling better. Now if everyone can just get back on their feet!
I love you, hugs! (Gag - remember it's ALL A GAME .... RIGHT!?!?!?)
Doug
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dolor temporarius.
Gloria aeterna.
Cicatrices virginibus placent.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Showing 1 - 5. [ Next ]
bush


