Films @ MindSay



 

   
Top 100 Favorite Films
I have lots more, but these perhaps are my top favorites!
  1. Double vie de Véronique, La/The Double Life of Veronique (1991, Krzysztof Kieslowski)
    Image
  2. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004, Michel Gondry)
    Image
  3. Crimes and Misdemeanors (1989, Woody Allen)
    Image
  4. Bonnie and Clyde (1967, Arthur Penn)
    Image
  5. Network (1976, Sidney Lumet)
    Image
  6. Sunset Blvd. (1950, Billy Wilder)
    Image
  7. Trois couleurs: Rouge/Three Colors: Red (1994, Krzysztof Kieslowski)
    Image
  8. Bon voyage (2003, Jean-Paul Rappeneau)
    Image
  9. La Cérémonie/A Judgement in Stone (1995, Claude Chabrol)
    Image
  10. Sense and Sensibility (1995, Ang Lee)
    Image
  11. Shadow of a Doubt (1943, Alfred Hitchcock)
    Image
  12. Roman Holiday (1953, William Wyler)
    Image
  13. Cléo de 5 à 7 /Cleo from 5 to 7 (1962, Agnes Varda)
    Image
  14. A Star is Born (1937, William A. Wellman)
    Image
  15. The Royal Tenenbaums(2001, Wes Anderson)
    Image
  16. Angst vor der Angst /Fear of Fear (1975, Rainer Werner Fassbinder)
    Image
  17. Goodfellas (1990, Martin Scorsese)
    Image
  18. Vertigo (1958, Alfred Hitchcock)
    Image
  19. Dangerous (1935, Alfred E. Green)
    Image
  20. All About Eve (1950, Joseph L. Mankiewicz)
    Image
  21. Todo sobre mi madre/All About My Mother (1999, Pedro Almodóvar)
    Image
  22. Confidences trop intimes/Intimate Strangers (2004, Patrice Leconte)
    Image
  23. My Life Without Me (2003, Isabel Coixet)
    Image
  24. M (1931, Fritz Lang)
    Image
  25. Cet obscur objet du désir, That Obscure Object of Desire (1977, Luis Buñuel)
    Image

  26. Vivement dimanche! (1983, François Truffaut)
    Image
  27. Ensayo de un crimen/The Criminal Life of Archibaldo de la Cruz (1955, Luis Buñuel)
    Image
  28. À bout de souffle/ Breathless (1959, Jean-Luc Godard)
    Image
  29. Camille Claudel (1988, Bruno Nuytten)
    Image
  30. Memento(2000, Christopher Nolan)
    Image
  31. Casablanca (1942, Michael Curtiz)
    Image
  32. La Fille sur le pont/The Girl On the Bridge (1999, Patrice Leconte)
    Image
  33. Quai Des Orfèvres/Jenny Lamour (1947, Henri-Georges Clouzot)
    Image
  34. Au hasard Balthazar (1966, Robert Bresson)
    Image
  35. (Nuovo) Cinema Paradiso (1988, Giuseppe Tornatore)
    Image
  36. Demoiselles de Rochefort, Les/Young Girls of Rochefort (1967, Jacques Demy/Agnès Varda)
    Image
  37. The Graduate (1967, Mike Nichols)
    Image
  38. My Man Godfrey (1936, Gregory La Cava)
    Image
  39. Gilda (1946, Charles Vidor)
    Image
  40. The Bad and the Beautiful (1952, Vincente Minnelli)
    Image
  41. Laura (1944, Otto Preminger)
    Image
  42. The Sweet Hereafter (1997, Atom Egoyan)
    Image
  43. It Happened One Night (1934, Frank Capra)
    Image
  44. Alice (1990, Woody Allen)
    Image
  45. The Purple Rose of Cairo (1985, Woody Allen)
    Image
  46. Another Woman (1988, Woody Allen)
    Image
  47. Coup de torchon/Clean Slate (1981, Bertrand Tavernier)
    Image
  48. The French Connection (1971, William Friedkin)
    Image
  49. L.A. Confidential (1997, Curtis Hanson)
    Image
  50. Inside Daisy Clover (1965, Robert Mulligan)
    Image
  51. Final Destination (2000, James Wong)
    Image
    Also:
    Final Destination II (2003, David R. Ellis)
    Final Destination III (2006, James Wong)
  52. Se7en (1995, David Fincher)
    Image
  53. Antoine and Colette (1962, François Truffaut)
    Image
  54. Volver / To Return (2006, Pedro Almodóvar)
    Image
  55. Mystic River (2003, Clint Eastwood)
    Image
  56. Mulholland Dr. (2001, David Lynch)
    Image
  57. Three Days of the Condor (1975, Sydney Pollack)
    Image
  58. The Thin Man (1934, W.S. Van Dyke)
    Image
  59. Now Voyager (1942, Irving Rapper)
    Image
  60. The Godfather (1972, Francis Ford Coppola)
  61. The Godfather: Part II (1974, Francis Ford Coppola)
    Image
  62. Bringing Up Baby (1938, Howard Hawks)
    Image
  63. The Dead Zone (1983, David Cronenberg)
    Image
  64. Singin' in the Rain (1952, Stanley Donen)
    Image
  65. Witness for the Prosecution (1957, Billy Wilder)
    Image
  66. Chelovek s kino-apparatom/Man With the Movie Camera (1929, Dziga Vertov)
    Image
  67. Les Yeux sans visage / Eyes Without a Face (1960, Georges Franju)
    Image
  68. I Heart Huckabees (2004, David O. Russell)
    Image
  69. Rushmore (1998, Wes Anderson)
    Image
  70. Shopgirl (2005, Anand Tucker)
    Image
  71. The Squid and the Whale (2005, Noah Baumbach)
    Image
  72. One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (1975, Milos Forman)
    Image
  73. Amadeus (1984, Milos Forman)
    Image
  74. Leon: The Professional (1994, Luc Besson)
    Image
  75. Fem benspaend, De /The Five Obstructions (2003, Jørgen Leth)
    Image
  76. Lolita (1962, Stanley Kubrick)
    Image
  77. Scaphandre et le papillon, Le/The Diving Bell and the Butterfly (2007, Julian Schnabel)
    Image
  78. Breakfast at Tiffany's (1961, Blake Edwards)
    Image
  79. Lola (1961, Jacques Demy)
    Image
  80. You Can Count on Me (2000, Kenneth Lonergan)
    Image
  81. Broken Flowers (2005, Jim Jarmusch)
    Image
  82. Bitteren Tränen der Petra von Kant, Die/ The Bitter Tears of Petra Von Kant (1972, Rainer Werner Fassbinder)
    Image
  83. Scarface (1983, Brian De Palma)
    Image
  84. All the President's Men (1976, Alan J. Pakula)
    Image
  85. Something's Gotta Give (2003, Nancy Meyers)
    Image
  86. Angst essen Seele auf /Ali: Fear Eats the Soul (1974, Rainer Werner Fassbinder)
    Image
  87. Amores Perros (2000, Alejandro González Iñárritu)
    Image
  88. His Girl Friday (1940, Howard Hawks)
    Image
  89. Bad Timing (1980, Nicolas Roeg)
    Image
  90. Jeanne la Pucelle - Les prisons (1994, Jacques Rivette)
    Image
  91. Heavenly Creatures (1994, Peter Jackson)
    Image
  92. Coeurs/Private Fears in Public Places (2006, Alain Resnais)
    Image
  93. Underground (1995, Emir Kusturica)
    Image
  94. Tess (1979, Roman Polanski)
    Image
  95. Persona (1966, Ingmar Bergman)
    Image
  96. Les Diaboliques (1955, Henri-Georges Clouzot)
    Image
  97. The Untouchables (1987, Brian De Palma)
    Image
  98. Chinatown (1974, Roman Polanski)
    Image
  99. Deserto rosso, Il /The Red Desert (1964, Michelangelo Antonioni)
    Image
  100. Angèle (1934, Marcel Pagnol)
    Image
 
 
   
 

10 cinematic techniques and genres that I can't stand.

In no particular order:

 

1. Jesus poses

 

I don't think anything gets me quite as much as this. As a metaphor, the 'crucifixion' pose is about as subtle as an Adam Sandler film, and just as weak. OK, we get it - he sacrificed himself. And Jesus sacrificed himself. So deep.

 

By the way, I understand there's only so many ways someone can fall to the ground when killed, and YES, it's tempting. But please, for Christ's sake (see what I did there?)... just don't.

 

Examples of this vice: Gran Torino, and, in a whole class of its own, Superman Returns. God that was stupid.

 

Exception to the rule: The Omega Man. The closing scene is still kind of silly (as is the film, actually), but it does actually make some kind of sense in the context.

 

2. Shaky cam

 

Yes, I'm far from alone on this one, but it had to make the list. Now, it's not that I hate handheld camerawork without reservation - some films have used it very well. Still, there's a special place of loathing in my heart for especially obnoxious handheld. You know what I mean.

 

Examples of this vice: Half Nelson, The Idiots, and, of course, The Blair Witch Project.

 

Exception to the rule: The Child, or, in fact, any film by the Dardenne brothers. The cinematography manages to give these films a sense of heightened realism and immediacy, which is what handheld is actually supposed to do.

 

3. Not knowing when to stop

 

You know the film. It seems to be drawing to a close, and it has actually been a pretty decent movie. The credits, it seems, will roll at any second.

 

And then the film keeps going. 10 minutes. 20 minutes. Soon, another half-hour has passed and you're just hoping for the audience's sake, and your own sanity, that the film could just end. But no, this movie isn't going to finish until every single loose end has been tied, every character has hugged every other character and your bottom is experiencing a new feeling of intense numbness.

 

Examples of this vice: Cinema Paradiso, The Lives of Others and the brain-freezing drivel that was Australia.

 

Exception to the rule: Jacques Rivette's La Belle Noiseuse. With a running time of about 240 minutes, it seems like it will never end... but in this case, you don't want it to. The key is in the pacing - the films I've listed above just seem rushed and sloppy towards the end.

 

4. Slow-mo for dramatic effect

 

Slow-motion is one of the oldest, and simplest, special effects in cinema. When used properly, it can convey drama, beauty and surrealism. When used unnecessarily, or overused within a film, it seems hackneyed, ham-fisted and ridiculous. The biggest problem is that there are some directors who seem to think that dramatic weight increases accordingly with number of slow-motion sequences.

 

Example of this vice: American History X. I can think of no other film that has used slow-motion quite so shamelessly, especially in such a self-important film (did YOU know that white supremacists were bad?). Also, the ending of Thelma and Louise uses slow-motion to unintentionally hilarious effect.

 

Exception to the rule: Stalker. No director has managed to use slow-mo quite like Andrei Tarkovsky, whose films are consitently visually extraordinary and filled with beautiful, dream-like imagery.

 

5. Violence

 

This one may be kind of contentious, but I am not a fan of on-screen violence, and more so, many audiences' disturbing fascination with it. This is not to say that it has no place in cinema, but there is no doubt that it is overused, and, indeed, glamourised in many Hollywood films. I wish more directors would take a leaf out of the book of Michael Haneke, who consistently manages to explore disturbing subject material and the theme of violence without showing anything explicitly: the result is far more effective.

 

Examples of this vice: Hannibal Rising probably has nothing on some of the more gratuitous films of recent years, but as I avoid most of them like the plague, it'll have to do. Other examples are 300, Resident Evil: Extinction, Pasolini's catalogue of cruelty Salo, and the vast majority of action and horror movies emerging from Hollywood in the last few decades.

 

Exceptions to the rule: Hidden (not coincidentally, directed by Haneke), Fight Club, and Peter Jackson's absurd ultra-violent comedy Braindead.

 

6. Overused pop culture references

 

In Beverly Cleary's children's novel Ramona and Her Father, the dad has a saying: "first time is funny, second time is silly and third time is a spanking." I wish that filmmakers would take note of this in regards to two terribly overused gags (although I'm sure there are others): 1) "Eye of the Tiger" appearing at any point of a film and 2) a group of characters walking towards the screen in slow-motion, Reservoir Dogs style (and even that itself was a homage to A Clockwork Orange). Funny the first time, but very quickly going the way of Paris Hilton jokes.

 

Examples of this vice: One need only sift through the internet movie database to find classics of cinema such as Epic Movie, Night at the Museum, Kicking and Screaming, Doctor Dolittle and Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd which make use of the song at one point. As for the slow-motion one, pick any one of a handful of kids movies from the last few years.

 

Exception to the rule: Starter for 10 actually uses both (from memory, in the same sequence no less), but I'll forgive it on account of being a very funny and otherwise quite original romantic comedy.

 

7. Biopics

 

This may be harsh, but there is something about the biopic genre that just doesn't work for me (and, indeed, this applies to the majority of 'true story' films). Firstly, the film often tries to span many years, and I think this automatically weakens it. For me, movies which simply depict a short time period of someone's life, without back story, are far stronger. I also feel that biopics, bound as they are to follow real events and do justice to the people involved, often seem to lack a real point. No matter how extraordinary someone's life was, I find myself asking 'so what?' - what is this film trying to say, exactly? As a result I find these movies, almost without exception, boring.

 

Biopics also seem to have a tendency to wrap up with a description of what befell each character after the conclusion of the film's events, which (ironically) only adds to the incomplete feel of it all. Special mention must be made here to fictional films which end in the same manner, such as Unbreakable. To put it bluntly, it's ten times worse.

 

Examples of this vice: A French Woman, Camille Claudel, The Life and Death of Peter Sellers.

 

Exceptions to the rule: Milk proved to me quite recently that a biopic could, in fact, be an excellent film. Boys Don't Cry might have been another example of this had the supporting cast known how to act and the director not been so bland.

 

8. Alternate endings

 

Although these aren't part of the movie per se, their inclusion on the DVD is a sure sign that the director had no idea how to finish the film, and almost seems like an apology for the weak cinematic ending. One thing that the endings usually have in common is that they are equally crap.

 

Examples of this vice: This seems to be a category exclusive to the b-grade thriller. Godsend, The Butterfly Effect and, most laughably, Hide and Seek (more on that in my next post) have all been guilty of this self-indulgence.

 

Exceptions to the rule: There are none. Most serious directors actually realise that the conclusion is absolutely crucial to the film, and as such, put a bit of effort in.

 

9. 'Foreign' characters speaking in English... with an accent.

 

Subtitles don't really wash with a lot of mainstream audiences, and as such, with some exceptions (The Kite Runner, Slumdog Millionaire), most Hollywood films set in a different country simply use English. This would be fine, but there seems to be a constant need to give the characters 'foreign' accents (or worse, British). The suspension of disbelief required for these films is absurd, and I feel that any movie with serious intentions should either drop the accents or do the brave thing and inflict the unthinkable terror of subtitles.

 

Examples of this vice: Hannibal Rising (again... it was a pretty bad film), almost any movie featuring Nazis, and The Unbearable Lightness of Being.

 

Exception to the rule: Nothing that strictly meets the criteria, but Pasolini's The Canterbury Tales is kind of an example of the reverse. Although, of course, the stories are set in England, the characters all speak in Italian, but inexplicably break into song in English from time to time. Despite this, it's an excellent, bawdy, completely insane film that loses nothing for its logical inconsistencies.

 

10. British bad guys

 

This says a lot about American attitudes and stereotypes, but it seems that no 'baddy' is truly evil without a British accent. Disney films are especially guilty of this.

 

Exception to this rule: Seeing as how even the presence of a two-dimensional 'bad guy' is generally the hallmark of a dull Hollywood film or a children's movie, it's no surprise that it's difficult to find an example of a good movie with an evil pommy. The closest I could find is Pulp Fiction, with Tim Roth attempting to rob the diner at the beginning and climax of the film.

 

So, that's it. Of course, this is a far from definitive list, and I didn't even get to sentimentality, overacting or sequels, but I have at least covered most of the flaws that turn me off a lot of movies. I can only hope that a fair proportion of filmmakers have learnt from these mistakes and will make some attempt to avoid them, thus sparing audiences annoyance, boredom and a fervent desire to throw popcorn at the screen.

 
 
 

   
Happy 85th Birthday Cliff Robertson
cliff_main.jpg hosted for free by ImageShack


In the past, on Mindsay, I've called my husband my Spice.  This is from the movie Charly (flowers for algernon) with Cliff Robertson in the title role, for which he won the Academy Award.  In it he says "If the plural of mouse is mice, is the plural of spouse, spice?"  Here's to you, Mr. Robertson!

 

Robertson is notable for his performances in PT 109 (chosen personally by John F. Kennedy to portray the then-Lt. Kennedy), The Best Man, Charly (an adaptation of Flowers for Algernon for which he won the 1968 Academy Award for Best Actor), Picnic, Autumn Leaves, Too Late the Hero, Three Days of the Condor, Obsession, J. W. Coop, Star 80 and Malone. More recently, Robertson's career has had a resurgence. He appeared as Uncle Ben Parker in the first movie adaptation of Spider-Man, as well as in the sequels Spider-Man 2 and Spider-Man 3. He commented on his website that ""Since Spiderman 1 and 2, I seem to have a whole new generation of fans. That in itself is a fine residual."[3] He was also in the 2004 horror film Riding the Bullet.

Robertson in

 
 
Robertson in "The Galaxy Being" (1963), an episode of television's The Outer Limits

Robertson's television appearances include the starring role in the live space opera Rod Brown of the Rocket Rangers, as well as recurring roles on Hallmark Hall of Fame, Alcoa theatre, and Playhouse 90 (in the 1950s), Outlaws, The Twilight Zone, and Batman as the villainous gunfighter Shame (in the 1960s), Falcon Crest as Dr. Michael Ranson (in the 1980s), and most recently, The Lyon's Den. He had starring roles in both the 1960s and 1990s versions of The Outer Limits. He was awarded an Emmy for his leading role in an 1965 episode from Bob Hope Presents the Chrysler Theatre entitled "The Game." His second appearance on Batman featured his wife, Dina Merrill, as his sidekick and wife Calamity Jan. This two-part episode is considered by many Batman fans to be among the series' funniest. Also, in 1989, he narrated an AT&T promotional video documenting some of its technological improvements at the time. Incidentally, Robertson, who for ten years was a national TV spokesman for AT&T, (which won him the Advertising Age award for best commercial), was to be the keynote speaker at an AT&T stockholders' meeting during a strike by AT&T workers. Robertson refused to cross the picket line and did not speak at the meeting.

 
 
   
 

Love in the Time of Cholera, et Cetera

Last night, I watched Woody Allen's new film "Vicky Cristina Barcelona" and I found it extremely well done....very entertaining.  My friend was not familiar with Javier Bardem's talent and so I suggested we stop at Blockbuster after leaving the cinema to rent "Love in the Time of Cholera" which is another Bardem film.  This best selling novel by author Gabriel Garcia Marquez was adapted to film and directed by Mike Newell and starring Javier Bardem is about a young man who sets his heart on a lovely young woman whom he can not have.

 

His heart stays betrothed to Fermina while the young man, Florentino eases his void and lovesickness by bedding almost 700 women..

 

Finally at the end of his life, his dream of reconnecting with his heart comes true and he shares his deepest intimacy with Fermina.

 

I watched "Love in the Time of Cholera" again last night...It is the book that Sara wrote her name in ....in the lovely film "Serendipity" where love is left to fate. The book spoke to my heart.  He waited for his "Love" his entire life...He thought of her...He manifested himself with her...in love.

He had sex with other women but it was "her" he longed for, in order to satisfy his soul.

I find the notion overwhelming that a person can love another for an entire lifetime and never lose hope that someday they will be together.

 

The last scenes in the movie show the aged lovers finally together and in a sexually intimate moment.  Her breasts droop revealing all of her 73 years. She is shy and timid, afraid of showing her aged body but Farentino sees only beauty unconditionally.  He sees only his love.  Beauty is in the eyes of love...This man with his multitude of lovers yearns for this aged droopy breasted wrinkled body and that is most beautiful...Love sees Love...With Fermina, he is complete..He tells her,  "I have never been so happy". His soul has finally found rest...He has found his home.

 

Would you wait a lifetime for Love?

 

 

 

 
 
 

   
."He won't look over here... I'm waving, but he's talking to that little kid."
.The first 40 Films (plus one) I've seen this summer in chronological order of viewing with ratings on a 4 star scale (green--fiction, Netflix; blue--rented; yellow--documentary; red--seen in movie theater; black--watched online because it wasn't worth it):

.He Was A Quiet Man ** 1/2
The Gift  ***
What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? ***
Bad Education ***
The Strangers ***
Vertigo *** 1/2
Full Metal Jacket ***
Citizen Kane *** 1/2
Blade Runner *** 1/2
The King of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters  ***
An Inconvenient Truth  ***

Lust, Caution ***
La Dolce Vita ***
The Happening **
The Godfather *** 1/2
Bringing Up Baby ***
Be Kind Rewind ***
The Last Unicorn **
Sunset Boulevard ***
The Godfather Part II ****
Get Smart ***
Persona ***
Spellbound ***
Female Trouble ***
Casablanca ***
Barton Fink *** 1/2
For the Bible Tells Me So *** 1/2
The Seventh Seal ***
Kaena: The Prophecy **
Wall-E ****
The Corporation ** 1/2
The Lady Vanishes ***
Ran *** 1/2
The Holy Mountain *** 1/2
Of Human Bondage ***
Taxi Driver *** 1/2
Lost in La Mancha ***
The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari ***
Short Cuts ***
Super Size Me ***
C.R.A.Z.Y.

 


.Many of them I watched for personal research purposes; however, there are a few I just felt like seeing. The color-coding was mostly for me, but I included it. Obviously. I didn't rate the last film, C.R.A.Z.Y., because I just saw it today. I'll wait until about 21 movies later to rate it and its group.

.Am I mad for doing this--all this movie-watching? No, I was probably mad before. And it gives me something to do. Something about which to discipline myself. I almost feel guilty if a day goes by in which I haven't seen a film. I'll be seeing more. A lot more. Trust me on this one.


.If you want to know about any of the films in greater detail or disagree (or agree) about any of the ratings, feel free to let me know.
 
 
   
 

Showing 1 - 5.   [ Next ]
 
Latest Comment
Re: Trial by Vile - It separates them from us. There's more destruction wrought on us than losing life. We...

Read...


 
© 2005-2007 MindSay Interactive LLC
| Terms of Service
| Privacy Policy
My Account
Inbox
Account Settings
Lost Password?
Logout
Blog
Update Blog
Edit Old Entries
Pick a Theme
Customize Design
Modify Plugins
Community
Your Profile
Wiki Pages
MindSay Tags
Video & Photos
Geographic Directory
Inside MindSay
About MindSay
MindSay and RSS
Report Spam
Contact Us
Help