
Demolition @ MindSay 
| Building Demolition Contractor Services Throughout the United States by Universal Wrecking Corp. |
| Universal Wrecking Corp. provides demolition contractor services, as well as equipment salvage and scrap metal recycling, throughout the United States. Our demolition contractor services include:
We also provide complimentary services including
Our employees are OSHA trained and operate in a safe and efficient manner.
For more information on all our demolition company services go to our Demolition Contractor Services Page |
what else can I say... I totally foraged on leftover treats from the book group, my stomach aches and I feel degenerate but the bad stuff is gone and tomorrow I can eat rabbit food. I also managed to remove tiles from behind the cook top. demolition is a great tension relief. this week end I patch and paint. anyone want to come over and help?
oh no am I visually repating myself?
Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center, spoke of the resilience of the towers in an interview recorded on January 25, 2001.
| The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door -- this intense grid -- and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting.
|
Demartini, who had an office on the 88th floor of the North Tower, has been missing since the 9/11/01 attack, having remained in the North Tower to assist in the evacuation.
This is from Dr. Steven Jones:
I also agree with Kevin Ryan’s objections regarding the NIST study. Kevin Ryan, at the time a manager at Underwriters Laboratories (UL), makes a point of the non-collapse of actual WTC-based models in his letter to Frank Gayle of NIST:
As I'm sure you know, the company I work for certified the steel components used in the construction of the WTC buildings. In requesting information from both our CEO and Fire Protection business manager last year… they suggested we all be patient and understand that UL was working with your team… I'm aware of UL's attempts to help, including performing tests on models of the floor assemblies. But the results of these tests… indicate that the buildings should have easily withstood the thermal stress caused by… burning [jet fuel, paper, etc.]. (Ryan, 2004)
That models of WTC trusses at Underwriter Laboratories (UL) subjected to fires did NOT fail is also admitted in the final NIST report:
NIST contracted with Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. to conduct tests to obtain information on the fire endurance of trusses like those in the WTC towers…. All four test specimens sustained the maximum design load for approximately 2 hours without collapsing… The Investigation Team was cautious about using these results directly in the formulation of collapse hypotheses. In addition to the scaling issues raised by the test results, the fires in the towers on September 11, and the resulting exposure of the floor systems, were substantially different from the conditions in the test furnaces. Nonetheless, the [empirical test] results established that this type of assembly was capable of sustaining a large gravity load, without collapsing, for a substantial period of time relative to the duration of the fires in any given location on September 11. (NIST, 2005, p. 141; emphasis added.)
So how does the NIST team justify the WTC collapses, when actual models fail to collapse and there are zero examples of fire-caused high-rise collapses? Easy, NIST concocted computer-generated hypotheticals for very “severe” cases, called cases B and D (NIST, 2005, pp. 124-138). Of course, the details are rather hidden to us. And they omit consideration of the complete, rapid and symmetrical nature of the collapses.
Indeed, NIST makes the startling admission in a footnote on page 80 of their Final Report:
The focus of the Investigation was on the sequence of events from the instant of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for each tower. For brevity in this report, this sequence is referred to as the "probable collapse sequence," although it does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached...(NIST, 2005, p. 80, fn. 12; emphasis added.)
Please read the entire paper by Jones here:
http://physics911.net/stevenjones.htm
Ok so Veggie boy had been doing some demolitioning in his backyard for the past 2 weeks or so. He had to remove the chicken coop his father built back in 1979 or something like that. And it has been a MAJOR mess! I mean the man built it to last and appearantly his Father (from the old country) used everything he could find to house the chickens.
Chicken Coop Pre destruction
Chicken Coop Post Destruction
Here are a few of the poor tenants that were ousted because of the destruction. Veggie boy being a Vegan and Animal activist placed them in a bucket and walked them to a lake near by. *insert Awwwwws here*
Cute little froggie! He put a 50cent piece next to it to show size.
Mister lizard who looks tiny BUT if you get a closer look?
AAAH! GODZILLA!
Now for the true scary part that had Veggie boy screaming like a little girl and doing the running waving hand girly dance. (his neighbor came to make sure he was ok)
Ok, truthfully I would have screamed louder than him. And possibly injured anyone standing in my way while I run like my ass was on fire.
SCREAM! Yeah..the worse one ever! It's a Huntsman Spider EXTREMELY deadly. Needless to say Veggie boy did not do a rescue for the last two. He just ran away and avoided them like the plague.
LOL This whole time he has saved like 6 frogs and 1 lizard carrying each one of them to the lake. I can't wait to see what he comes across next.




