Crusades @ MindSay 
The Crusades: A vicious war for the right of diverse religions[Muslim Jewish and Christian] to live together in peace.
The Holocaust:A terrible and horrific prejudice for Jews and non Christians in Europe.
Darfur: Dictatorship and homocide in the 21st century
If the Crusades happened why did the Holocaust happen? If the Holocaust happened why is Darfur happening?
This is not a "What has the world come to?" but "What has the people of this world come to?"
What has the people of this world come to?
Islamofascism and the inherent Theo-political cult of death known as Islam to adherents and as Mohammedanism to people like me that have disdain for a medieval threat of violence that terrifies those that love Liberty and Freedom has struck fear into LiveLeak.
LiveLeak was the video service I used to share the Movie Short Fitna to readers who wished to be educated about the true nature of Mohammedanism. That link now leads to a LiveLeak apology to its clientele because the fear of death threats to its staff constrained them to cave into Islamofascism to place security above the passion of Freedom.
Actually I cannot blame LiveLeak. With governments in the West promoting Appeasement to Mohammedans at the cost of Freedom and Liberty that has evolved in the world with the example of the American experiment after the Revolutionary War.
Western governments and the U.S. government have allowed litigation, the fear of Mohammedan rioting and the threat of Islamic terrorism killing citizens in the West in the name of Mohammed and Allah to Appease the protests of Mohammedans that value medieval Sharia Law above the modern concept of Freedom and Liberty.
Thanks to World Net Daily I have found a Part 1 and Part 2 division of the LiveLeak version on YouTube. My wonder is this: Will YouTube experience pressure to cave into Islamofascism and depreciate Freedom and Liberty as LiveLeak was forced to do?
It is time for the Governments of the West to put down their differences of Leftwing ideology and Rightwing ideology and confront the foreign cultural values of Theo-political Mohammedan ideology aggressively to protect not only our citizens but to defend the levels of Freedom and Liberty the West has attained.
If aggressively means deporting residential aliens and/or jailing naturalized citizens that support the death cult that expects acts of violence to rain down on people utilizing Freedom of Speech or Conscience, then so be it.
As an American, I for one have grown weary and impatient that Political Correctness terminates my Constitutional Rights of Freedom and Liberty deeming my criticism of Mohammedanism as “Hate Speech” when in fact my criticism of Mohammedanism is a defense of Freedom and Liberty. Frankly I do not care if Western Freedom and Liberty offends Mohammedanism. I am an American living in secular-political nation with a heritage of Christianity that has influenced right, wrong and principles of Justice.
Come on LEFT and RIGHT, we are not each other’s enemy common enemy to the way we live. That enemy is Mohammedanism as expressed by radical Islamism with greater and greater acceptance by Mohammedans in general. I am speaking to the LEFT and RIGHT: we disagree on the direction America should take, but we agree on using interpretations of Constitutional Law to find that direction. Mohammedanism seeks to eliminate the path of Freedom and Liberty embedded in the American mind of the LEFT and RIGHT.
Americans UNITE! Even more important: Western style nations UNITE! Let us confront Mohammedanism even as they accuse the West anyway. It is time for a 21st century Crusade.
Now I know Leftwing Academic historians have painted the ugly facts of the medieval Crusades. Those facts are accurately ugly. However the demon of Political Correctness fails to equally paint the ugly facts of Mohammedan military advancement and conquests that were equally if not heinously worse than the ugliness of the medieval Crusades.
The thing is the Mohammedan mindset of medieval ugliness is alive and well in the 21st century whereas it is the West that has such principles of the Geneva Conventions (even though many in the West have only partially practiced those Conventions or totally ignored them).
The adherence to the Geneva Conventions (of degrees of the lack thereof) is a modern phenomena compared to the medieval principles utilized by Islamists extracted from their own holy writings. Yes I know there are compassionate Mohammedan holy writings; however in the 21st century Islamism leans on the interpretations of medieval brutality of death and destruction to non-Mohammedans (fakir) and Mohammedans that do not agree with Islamist interpretations.
It is time to meet 21st century Jihad with a 21st century Crusade that is more secular than religious and with the rules of engagement that the Allies used in WWII to defeat the Axis Powers utterly with the terms of unconditional surrender. Forsake principles of Political Correctness, it will destroy the West.
I'm sorry, but whenever you're going to spend most of your time railing against religions of various sorts, please at least make some sort of effort to understand a particular religion's doctrine, and how those doctrines will differ between religions. IE: The Crusades (associated with Christianity) is very different from Jihad (associated with Islam). It would benefit to take note of where religion is hijacked as a political means of control, and where the religion is itself a political means of control. There is a difference, and it's hugely important that it's taken note of.
It's a certain case when a religious leader uses his authority and power to manipulate the followers of the religion which he represents into supporting a cause which is not necessarily one which the doctrine of the said religion follows. It's another case where a religious leader teaches the doctrines of a certain religion to inspire the followers of said religion to support a cause which is one that the religion's doctrine supports--even if it is one of particular political gain for the religious leader.
Let's also be careful when making religion and politics synonimous... you don't want it that way now in our politics, but you find it oh so convenient when attacking religion's past. Political issues of a secular nature occurred then, just as now, and in many cases the unifying force was a religious institution--so the religious institution had to make decisions based largely upon a secular importance, however, being a religious institution, it inevitably (rightly or wrongly) attached to the issues a religious nature which taints (seeming forever) the religion's reputation... (Of course I'm mainly speaking of the Roman Catholic Church and the Crusades--but there are other issues that also apply.)
Oh yeah, and whenever you can't make an argument without the use of those lovely Anglo-Saxon four-letter-words, I really question your intelligence, not only in the subject being discussed, but your intelligence at large.
Why is Christianity such a bloody religion?
No, I don’t mean the Crusades. Can we put this straight, once and for all? A relationship with God cannot be coerced. A conversion cannot be forced—at least not a conversion by Christian standards. Why? Because when one gives his life to Jesus Christ, he/she is changed, spiritually, by God Himself. It is an experiential event. It’s not adopting a set of values. It’s not swearing allegiance to some religion. It’s not being brain-washed, as I’ve heard some rabid Christian-haters say recently.
It’s being blood-washed.
So, here we are, circling back to the bloody religion.
I’m reading Leviticus, and, boy, is there a lot of blood and livers, intestines and kidneys in that book. Why? The animals were sacrificed to cover the sins of the people of Israel. Lots of slaughter. Why so much?
Because, from God’s point of view, sin is drop-dead serious. We don’t think about this in our Western culture today, but sin is against Him. And there will be an accounting, not to our judicial system, not to our families or spouses or the media, but to Him.
If we don’t get this, we don’t get the cross. Because that’s where Jesus, drenched in blood, took the punishment for the sin that you have done—and will do.
The love of God is not all peaches and cream, warm and fuzzy. It’s gritty and bloody. It had to be. Sin is serious—eternally serious.
However, we have been forgiven, if we’ll just believe. Ah, why is that so difficult? Why is it so difficult to believe in a God who yearns for you to believe that He wants to forgive you, so you can live with Him forever?
I think I know. It’s pride. I’ve got a lot of it, and I know how it keeps God from doing His life and death work in me.
I don’t wanna die, so I die.
