Citizens @ MindSay 
Public Post
Click Here To Escape
In Case Of Teacher,
Kids, Spouse, or Boss
Welcome! You Are The Has Visited My Blog Since 06:49 Hrs Zulu On 8 March 2005
Valued Guest Who TH
Hit counter provided by hit counter website.
OR
Is This Just The Beginning of Global Tyranny?
How many of you guys know that there are already more than 345,000 “FULLY ARMED” foreign troops stationed within the borders of the Continental United States?
Better yet, how many of you have given any thought as to “WHY” those mother fuckers are roaming our streets?
Here’s something for you to think about, and if you read this stuff with an open mind it’ll scare the fucking shit out of you. The http links will work in this post but I don’t know if any of the links in the articles will work or not…, that’s why I included the http shit.
http://justgetthere.us/blog/archives/Military-To-Work-With-FEMA-During-Swine-Flu-Pandemic.html OK, so you have got to copy past that fucker into your browser if you want to go to that site.
[EDITED: Duh..., I just had a blond moment there. "Click Here" instead of doing the copy\paste thingy Boo.]
Wednesday, July 29. 2009
Military To Work With FEMA During Swine Flu Pandemic
CNN report stokes fears of martial law, mandatory vaccination program
By Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet | According to a CNN report, the military will assist civilian authorities in the event of a significant swine flu outbreak in the U.S. this fall, stoking fears that the pandemic, which has claimed relatively few lives so far, will be used as an excuse to implement martial law and a mandatory vaccination program.
“The plan calls for military task forces to work in conjunction with the Federal Emergency Management Agency. There is no final decision on how the military effort would be manned, but one source said it would likely include personnel from all branches of the military,” states the report.
The proposal, which was drawn up by U.S. Northern Command’s Gen. Victor Renuart, is awaiting final approval from Defense Secretary Robert Gates. The first step would be to sign an “execution order” which would authorize the military to begin detailed planning on how to implement the proposal, before actual orders to deploy military personnel are given.
The amount of troops required or whether they would come from the active duty or the National Guard and Reserve forces has not yet been determined.
Northcom has been preparing for mass flu pandemics for years and indeed, Gen. Victor Renuart spoke of the threat of a flu pandemic emerging out of Mexico just weeks before it actually happened.
[That one statement is what got me to reading some of the other stuff on this site.]
Testifying back in March, Renuart said Northcom would provide “assistance in support of civil authorities” during an epidemic, adding “when requested and approved by the Secretary of Defense or directed by the President, federal military forces will contribute to federal support.” However, Renuart then added, “USNorthCom does not wait for that call to action.”
“Because Mexico is our neighbor and disasters do not respect national boundaries, we are focused on developing and improving procedures to respond to potentially catastrophic events such as pandemic influenza outbreak, mass exposure to dangerous chemicals and materials, and natural disasters,” he testified.
Northcom was only relatively recently assigned its own fighting unit – the Army’s 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team, which had been fighting in Iraq for five years before that. As we have previously reported, the Armed Forces Press Service has initiated a propaganda campaign designed to convince the American people that deploying the 3rd Infantry Division in the United States in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act is a good thing, with images of soldiers from the brigade helping in “humanitarian” rescue missions, such as car wrecks. This is all designed to condition Americans to accept troops on the streets and highways as a part of everyday life.
The assignment of the 1st Brigade Combat Team to Northcom alarmed the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). “This is a radical departure from separation of civilian law enforcement and military authority and could, quite possibly, represent a violation of law,” said Mike German, ACLU national security policy counsel.
The news that troops are being prepared to work with FEMA in the event of a swine flu pandemic will increase fears that the government is preparing to enforce a mandatory vaccination program – at gunpoint if necessary.
State health authorities have already confirmed that if the government were to announce a mandatory vaccination program, then there would be no exemptions whatsoever and the program could be carried out with the use of force if necessary.
As reported by CNS News earlier this month, a health-care reform bill approved by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension Committee called The Affordable Health Choices Act, will fund the creation of state “intervention” teams that will carry out home visits in order to check that both children and adults have been vaccinated and also provide “provision of immunizations”.
“Home visits? What exactly is the state going to do when it sends people to “implement interventions” in private homes designed “to improve immunization coverage of children”? asks the CNS report.
There can be little doubt that many Americans will call upon their second amendment rights and resort to using force to protect themselves and their children if the government attempts to forcibly impose a mass vaccination program. This is why the assistance of military personnel may be necessary to subdue potential resistors in the event of mandatory quarantines and inoculations.
The last time the the national guard and military worked with FEMA and local law enforcement on a large scale in the United States was during Hurricane Katrina, when they aided in the confiscation of privately owned firearms of citizens, even those who lived in the high and dry areas and were unaffected by the hurricane.
http://justgetthere.us/blog/plugin/tag/martial+law
[EDITED: Duh..., yet another blond moment "Click Here" for that link.
Wednesday, August 5. 2009
Alabama County May Call In Troops To Perform Law Enforcement Duties
Another reflection of America’s decline into a Soviet-style militarized police state
By Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet | The implementation on martial law in America advanced a step further yesterday when the sheriff of Alabama’s most populous county said he would probably have to bring in National Guard troops to perform law enforcement duties due to budget cuts.
Plans to slash $4.1 million from the budget of Sheriff Mike Hale by Jefferson County commissioners in order to head off a municipal bankruptcy filing were approved by Circuit Judge Joseph L. Boohaker.
“A spokesman for Hale, Randy Christian, said the sheriff told Riley after the ruling that state assistance may be needed to perform basic law enforcement tasks once the department’s current funding is exhausted in early September,” reports the Associated Press.
“We will certainly be looking at calling in the National Guard,” said Christian.
Jefferson County has 640,000 residents and includes the state’s largest city, Birmingham.
Moves to replace traditional law enforcement with National Guard troops have been replicated in other parts of the country, including in Schenectady New York, where budgetary constraints were not even cited as a reason for the changeover.
After a handful of police officers were accused of assaulting citizens, Mayor Brian Stratton proposed declaring martial law and replacing the city’s entire roster of cops with National Guardsmen.
“It may be that as a stopgap measure, that you would need military forces – State Police, National Guard.” the Mayor said.
The use of military assets in civilian law enforcement is still illegal under Posse Comitatus, unless a clear state of emergency exists. The misbehavior of a few cops or the inability of a Sheriff to manage a budget cut does not constitute a state of emergency.
In this context, without the justification of an existing crisis that mandates National Guard intervention, the threat to replace police officers with troops on a whim is a sad reflection of how America is turning into a Soviet style military police state, as law enforcement increasingly shifts over to Homeland Security and Northcom controlled military assets.
Monday, August 3. 2009
Predictive Programming: TV Movie Shows Riots, Quarantines and Mass Graves For Pandemic Flu
Shit, Just click on that http thingy up there and read the whole fucking page.
[EDITED: OK, those links don't work either, so you have got to copy past that fucker into your browser if you want to go to that site.
EDITED YET AGAIN: After regaining my senses I made a couple of "click Here" thingies up there that work.]
And you don't think that any of that stuff CAN, WILL or IS happening right here in America?
Then you had better open your eyes and see the fricking politicians who are running this nation for what they actually are Boo..., every last one of those fuckers are Nazi's REGARDLESS of which political party they claim to represent.
We, the citizens of the USA, are already stuck between a rock and a hard place, and this shit is gonna be getting even worse, and in a big fucking hurry too Boo.
Keep your fowling piece well oiled and your powder dry, and keep both of those hidden from the prying eyes of the census Nazis that are soon going to be knocking on your door Boo.
♥ Wendy
Israel has far fewer restrictions
Over the last week, many are asking why India does not "do a Gaza" on Pakistan, referring, of course, to an emulation of Israel's use of force against Terrorists Hamas-run Palestine, a territory from which rockets rain down on Israeli soil with reliable frequency (if not reliable destructiveness ...).
The answer for this question comes always with a painful grip on reality, is simple: India does not because it cannot.
Here are five reasons why:
1. India is not a military goliath in relation to Pakistan in the way Israel is to the Palestinian territories. India does not have the immunity, the confidence and the military free hand that result from an overwhelming military superiority over an opponent. Israel's foe is a non-sovereign entity that enjoys the most precarious form of self-governance. Pakistan, for all its dysfunction, is a proper country with a proper army, superior by far to the tin-pot Arab forces that Israel has had to combat over time. Pakistan has nukes, to boot. Any assault on Pakistani territory carries with it an apocalyptic risk for India. This is, in fact, Pakistan's trump card. (This explains, also, why Israel is determined to prevent the acquisition of nuclear weapons by Iran.)
2. Even if India could attack Pakistan without fear of nuclear retaliation, the rationale for "doing a Gaza" is, arguably, not fully present: Israel had been attacked consistently by the very force--Hamas--that was in political control of the territory from which the attacks occurred. By contrast, terrorist attacks on India, while originating in Pakistan, are not authored by the Pakistani government. India can-- and does--contend that Pakistan's government should shut down the terrorist training camps on Pakistani soil. (In this insistence, India has unequivocal support from Washington.) Yet only a consistent and demonstrable pattern of dereliction by Pakistani authorities-- which would need to be dereliction verging on complicity with the terrorists--would furnish India with sufficient grounds to hold the Pakistani state culpable.
3. Israel enjoys impressive support from many countries especially from the Americans, in contrast to the Palestinians. No other state--apart, perhaps, from Britain--evokes as much favor in American public opinion as does Israel. This is not merely the result of the much-vaunted "Israel lobby" (to use a label deployed by its detractors), but also because of the very real depth of cultural interpenetration between American and Israeli society. This fraternal feeling buys Israel an enviable immunity in the conduct of its strategic defense. India, by contrast--while considerably more admired and favored in American public opinion than Pakistan--enjoys scarcely a fraction of Israel's "pull" in Washington when it comes to questions of the use of force beyond its borders.
4. Pakistan is strategically significant to the United States; the Palestinians are not. This gives Washington scant incentive to rein in the Israelis, but a major incentive to rein in any Indian impulse to strike at Pakistan. However justified the Indian anger against Pakistan over the recent invasion of Mumbai by Pakistani terrorists, the last thing that the U.S. wants right now is an attack--no matter how surgical--by India against Pakistan-based terror camps. This would almost certainly result in a wholesale shift of Pakistani troops away from their western, Afghan front toward the eastern boundary with India--and would leave the American Afghan campaign in some considerable disarray, at least in the short term. So Washington has asked for, and received, the gift of Indian patience. And although India recognizes that it is not wholly without options to mobilize quickly for punitive, surgical strikes in a "strategic space," it would--right now--settle for a trial of the accused terrorist leaders in U.S. courts. (Seven U.S Citizens were killed in Mumbai: Under U.S. law, those responsible--and this should include Pakistani intelligence masterminds--have to be brought to justice.)
5. Israel has the privilege of an international pariah to ignore international public opinion in its use of force against the Palestinians. A state with which few others have diplomatic relations can turn the tables on those that would anathematize it by saying, Hang diplomacy. India, by contrast, has no such luxury. It is a prisoner of its own global aspirations--and pretensions.
Well I have kept quite on Mindsay about how I feel about the economic bail out. And after getting a little more information, talking to a few people (including accountants and one friend that works for the IRS), and then hearing that the House defeated the bail out bill; I felt it was time to open my mouth.
I say good for the House of Reps for defeating the dayum thing! If you didn't know the buy out wouldn't have saved anyone? Including us peons of the middle and poor classes? If anything it would have harmed those of us that pay more taxes in then the rich ppl!
If you think I am shitting, you should have talked to your accountant and made a few phone calls to the IRS. If the bail out would have gone through, come Febuary when the next installment of the bail out was destined to happen, those of us who pay in to taxes and get tax returns would have been ass out! The big wigs and the politicians that wrote the bail out contract had it in their bill that if it came to pass, they would have taken everyone's tax return at next tax time.
Now normally I am not a big Michael Moore fan, but Mr. Moore with the help of MIT Financial Students, came up with a different plan for the same amount of money of the first bail out. That plan would have given each US Citizen 15-20 million dollars apeice. Not couples but apeice. Basically giving us back our own money. Do you know what all of us could have done with that money? We could have stabilized the economy! Those banks who are sitting on bad loans, could have been paid off by those that are paying on the bad loans. The housing market would have boomed! Morgateges would have been paid off, those of us that rent would have been able to go out and buy a house. The car industry would have increased because of everyone going out and buying new vechiles. The Retail industry would have increased with ppl doing home maintanice, buying items they have been needing but couldn't afford, and the travel industry would have boomed also! Not to mention we would have helped to bail out the financal institutions by investing our money. Back bills would have been paid off, increasing business investments of companies that would have seen a windfall of money coming at them!
Instead of helping these super rich coroprate men, they should look into helping the American People. And I have said it before and I'll say it again; I know right were we can get soem extra cash and clean up a budget or two! Take the dayum outragous income that still living Presidents and their wives get and cut it in 3/4 of what it is! They have done their job they shouldn't be getting that much money after the fact they did their job in office. The wives shouldn't get shit! They didn't do anything for our gov't. OOOOOOO they were ambassadors what ever. They weren't on the pay roll they don't get retirement! Same with the preisdential widows! Their ol men made a butt load of money. If they didn't invest it properally not the tax payers problems!
Okay that little rant is over with.:d So I finally put my two cents in on the bail out. I think we the people should get the money to pay off our back bills, our morgatages, and go out and help the economy instead of giving it to the banks that screwed up and gave out bad loans!
For the past few years, I and many other ppl have been feeling like we have been living in a increasing Communist Country. Our various freedoms and the right to do the most basic things has become illegal or taxed the hell out of. Did our Founding Fathers NOT start this country to get away from gov't rule and stupid assinine lack of common sense?
But US Citizens do not dispare! We are NOT alone in how our gov't is becoming a Communist Rule and telling us what we can do, how to do what they tell us we can do, and all that jive! The Britions are no better off then we are! Only difference is their anal retintive gov't calls their taxes and stupid ass laws "Sin Taxes".
The UK not only went after smoking but now they are going after drinking. And cars! Hey at least they are being fair if you ask my opinon on that! Not only are they making it illegal to kill oneself with smoke by making it almost unattinable to smoke anywhere but your house, now the UK is hiking their already HIGH booze tax up another 6%. They are now trying to do away with the "pub" scene. The car issue is along the lines of SUVs and bigger vechiles. For many US Citizens they have no clue exactly how expensive it is over in the UK.
Case in point when us US Citizens were bitching about paying 1.70 plus a gallon on gas the UK Citizens were already paying about 3-4 bucks a gallon for gas. So just imagine what they are paying now with US Citizens paying about 3-4 bucks a gallon for gas. They are looking at almost a 10 dollar a gallon gas fill.
Many British Citizens are speaking out on these "Sin" Taxes. Baisc enjoyment for many ppl of drinking, smoking, and driving vechiles they already paid otu the ass on are now "SINS" and they will be taxed for it. Citizens over in the UK have pointed out that their ecomony is just as shitty as the US's and the gov't is stupid ass hell for hiking these taxes because it will NOT stop ppl from drinking or smoking. If a person wants to drink and smoke they are going to. It won't stop them from driving their vechiles anymore than US Citizens have stopped driving big vechiles. All it is going to do is cost the Gov't money by loss of revenue.
And once our lovely gov'ts tax basic enjoyments to death and cause the majority of citizens in their country to stop doing what they enjoy, and cost the gov't revenue they will start taxing to death basic everyday living items even more than they already do. Because we all know that it isn't the gov't that keeps our countries running. It is the citizens and how they are taxed to death and then told we have no say in anything. We are told how to live our lives, what we can and can't do.
Saying this to anyone in our gov'ts can consitute a treason act if we act against it. Even when the US Consitution says the US Citizens have the right to rise up and clean out our own gov't. If we should do this we are committing a treasonist act even though we have a consitutional right to do so. In otherwords, if the Citizens of the US finally wise up and stop their bitching and act, we are dayumed. If we continue our bitching and do nothing we are dayumed. At least the US Citizens have a small recourse with our Consititution. I am not sure what the British Citizens have for recourse.
Got to love our Communist Gov'ts that use the guise of democrocy to beat down their citizens.
Just read the article on the new illegal immigrant law in OK!
Can we say a bunch of whiners!
We can't get jobs cause we need papers!
We have to have elabrote escape plans for our families in case one of us gets deported!
I lost 80% of my work force becasue all my workers are scared to work in a state like OK!
Blah Blah Blah Blah!
I have said it before and I'll say it again.
I have NO PROBLEMS with LEGAL immigrants or hell even ILLEGAL who are at least attempting to get legalized. I agree that our gov't make it riduclusly hard and way too expensive to become a legal immigrant especially when our grandparents and great grandparents did it for free!
But stop your bitching about having to finally step up and show legal paperwork saying you all can work in the US! Stop your bitching if your company goes belly up because you supported the illegals over US Citizens and are now loosing money!
We have to take care of our OWN citizens before we can help Mexicos!
Showing 1 - 5. [ Next ]
