Britain @ MindSay

Something that is not getting a lot of play on the media is the Free Speech persecution of a British Blogger known as Lionheart.

The last I heard he was flying back to Britain knowing that he was to be arrested as he stepped off the plane. Why the arrest? Lionheart is an ex-miscreant who turned his life around by becoming a Christian. Stories of turning one’s life around by becoming a Christian are rare stories in Europe these days.

I am unaware what Lionheart does to pay the bills; however his trouble with the British law is over his Blog’s writing about the threat of Islamism to Western society. Evidently a Mohammedan complained to the authorities in Britain that Lionheart’s blogs were incitement to hate-speech. You see there is no First Amendment right of freedom of speech in Britain as it is protected in America. In Britain a simple act of Parliament can redefine the parameters of Freedom of Speech.

This is what Lionheart is a victim of. Britain has a hate crimes law that if publications or speech is offensive to a race, creed, religion, gender etc.; then it is an equivalent of an American felony. That means if you point out acts of hatred as part of a religion, an offended member of that religion can press charges for hate speech.

Not being from Britain this may not be the precise definition; however it is the essence of Lionheart’s legal problems. Lionheart is anti-jihadi and anti-Islamist. Lionheart’s exposés of the jihad-Islamist mentality of much of the British Muslim population is criminal in Britain.

I have not run into any news about what has happened to Lionheart after he stepped off that plane; however I have ran into some information about what Lionheart is doing that the British law enforcement has determined enough to warrant an arrest.

This information comes from the Jillosophy blog. I will post her information with a few formatting changes at this blog.

JRH

This is one example of the new warning photo's that Britain plans on putting on packs of cigarettes. Think it will help?

The al Qaeda attack apparently might have an Anglo-American connection. It is now reported that 45 Mohammedan Doctors have been planning attacks in America via an Internet Café in Britain (not smart and thus may be a diversionary hoax).

It is true the Leftist apologists of the West blame Islamofascism as an offshoot to the poverty of Mohammedans in the Middle East and Mohammedan immigrants in the West. HELLO! Forty-five Doctors are professional and educated people. It takes dough to become a Doctor. The Theo-political ideology of al Qaeda and their cousin Islamofascist terrorist organizations is being led by educated people who are exploiting the poorer Mohammedans with propaganda; ergo an Islamofascist is born.

I have written in the past that America and the West must change their mind-set toward radical Mohammedanism (oft times referred to as Islamism). We in the West and/or America need to get behind a new paradigm that eschews Political Correctness (PC) with an exchange to a mind-set comparable to the reality of the Mohammedan threat to the West.

A blog site known as Webbloggin vicariously agrees with my assessment, which of course has stirred some excitement for me. It is good to know there are bloggers that are bold enough to write about reality in the face of the certain accusation of racism or Islamophobia.

Webbloggin writes of curtailing or eliminating Mohammedan immigration. I agree as long as the primary ideology promulgated by Mohammedans (almost evangelistically) is the Wahhabi-Sunni or the Twelver-Shi’ite Theo-political ideology. This ideology is a fanaticism that makes the Marxism of Lenin, Stalin and Mao look like a picnic. It melds politics with religion in such a way that it is intolerant and intransient toward change and modern thinking. This Islamofascist Theo-politics is violent in its nature deriving its ideology from the most violent parts of the Quran and its sub-writings such as the Hadith and Sharia Law (to name a few).

Who has the courage in the media, the Western intellectuals and Western politicians to stand up for Western Culture (whether Leftist or Conservative) against this radical Mohammedan Theo-political ideology?

Melanie Phillips defines Islamism (as opposed to Islam/Mohammedanism) and liberalism. Basically she calls Islamism a political ideology based on Islam and Wahabbism school of thought. Phillips’ definition of liberalism is in the classical sense. Classical liberalism is closer to what Americans would call the conservative movement.

The Phillips essay is an awesome analysis of how radical Islamism takes advantage of classical liberalism. Worse classical liberalism maintains that radical Islamists in the West (or in Britain in Phillips’ case) should have their freedom of expression even if it means the demise classical liberalism.

READ THE ESSAY.