
I don;t know who had their head in a smelly dark place but there are several things that should be done here.
1) I agree that the symbol is crap....
2) If there are any remains from the four they should have been desecrated with pigs blood...
3) Any attempt to place their names in the list with the other passengers should be rejected. There should be a list of the passengers, NOT THE VICTIMS, and a list of the attackers.
The people on flight 93 CHOSE to not be victims. I do not know how many of them got where. But I know that once a fuse is lit on a situation like that it burns bright. It is unlikely that any did not participate in some way - even if it was to line up as the second wave.
I have been at the site twice - once in 2002 and then again in Oct 2007.
One thing I did not know till 2007 was the way it crashed. The plane - a 757 - was IN A STEEP DIVE - ENGINES AT A HIGH SETTING - INVERTED (that means coming down fast - about 40 degrees, power on 500 miles an hour, and upside down) when it came over the hill - there is a salvage yard there. It was very low to make the hit in the field where it did, maybe only 100 feet above the heads of the men in the junkyard.
One of the possibilities is that he pilot inverted to throw the passengers off their attack and then pulled up to get away from the ground, a move the has him dive into the ground because when you are inverted, pulling back sends you to the ground...
1) I agree that the symbol is crap....
2) If there are any remains from the four they should have been desecrated with pigs blood...
3) Any attempt to place their names in the list with the other passengers should be rejected. There should be a list of the passengers, NOT THE VICTIMS, and a list of the attackers.
The people on flight 93 CHOSE to not be victims. I do not know how many of them got where. But I know that once a fuse is lit on a situation like that it burns bright. It is unlikely that any did not participate in some way - even if it was to line up as the second wave.
I have been at the site twice - once in 2002 and then again in Oct 2007.
One thing I did not know till 2007 was the way it crashed. The plane - a 757 - was IN A STEEP DIVE - ENGINES AT A HIGH SETTING - INVERTED (that means coming down fast - about 40 degrees, power on 500 miles an hour, and upside down) when it came over the hill - there is a salvage yard there. It was very low to make the hit in the field where it did, maybe only 100 feet above the heads of the men in the junkyard.
One of the possibilities is that he pilot inverted to throw the passengers off their attack and then pulled up to get away from the ground, a move the has him dive into the ground because when you are inverted, pulling back sends you to the ground...
One thing I did not say was that really hit me when I looked at a search of the web.
There are many conspiracy theories, all sound authoritative.
None of the are worth SHIT...
If you look at each of them critically you find irreparable flaws.
I still believe Lady Bird Johnson was a conspirator in the death of JFK but I am sure that the official account of 9/11 is accurate as far as we can tell.
There are many conspiracy theories, all sound authoritative.
None of the are worth SHIT...
If you look at each of them critically you find irreparable flaws.
I still believe Lady Bird Johnson was a conspirator in the death of JFK but I am sure that the official account of 9/11 is accurate as far as we can tell.
I don't know about Lady Bird because I have not really followed the details of Kennedy Assassination theories but I do agree with about 9/11.
One example that I cite in 9/11 is that the fighters that were alledged to have shot down flight 93 didn't have enough fuel to make it if they flew fast enough to get there. But the conspiracy theorists ignore that.
Quick Links
Latest Comment
Re: My Unbelief - Not at all Remember Job and God Job said whatever he felt. One time I was so fed up with...
| Terms of Service
| Privacy Policy
islam