Well, time for an actual post. The Internet is the stage o' the world, wonder what will happen here.

At the moment I am working on four websites independantly, and two jointly (which is plenty considering I hand code everything out of Notepad; I can't stand WYSIWYG editors). Basically, business is doing well. I think I'll be finishing up two of them soon and picking up a new one over the holiday, which is great. The thing that interests me, however, is how some people find me. I'm one person on the internet. I've gone and created what I feel is a handle that sticks in your head pretty well (Sir Whilms even seems odd to me), but I still would never expect people to distinguish me from any of the other 1E100 web designers out there. (Ugh, a Google in that notation... I'm such a nerd).

Google, actually, ties in with this post pretty well, but that's for later.

Basically, I've never once bought an ad. Never. I rarely pay any attention to ads, no matter how well they fit in with the context of a page. I just find forums, establish myself as someone who makes (good) websites, and things just happen. Any aspiring web designers may want to write that one down.

And now we move into the subject of web advertising. I'm pretty sure every seasoned web surfer on earth has become banner-blind. If you see something that looks remotely like a banner ad on any side of any page, it gets ignored. When ad firms figured this out, they designed annoying DHTML and Flash ads that litterally hijack your web surfing experience by moving/popping up/combusting smack dab in the middle of what you're trying to read. The very concept of forcing a users computer to do something (open a window), or literally stealing attention by moving in front of the actual content, just to show ads for what is invariably a ho-hum service makes my blood boil. Google Ads are the overachievers of web advertisements. They work well, they're driven by very powerful technology, and the ad seller can change the colors to blend with their site design better (which scores extra points with me, I'm obsessive over that sort of thing).

....

Ok, that was a bit of a mind dump. The odd thing is, I just suddenly ran out of anything to say at all. I work on websites and prefer Google Ads for their coolness.

Uh, that is all.

(I think tomorrow I'll spill my thoughts on something slightly more intersting... it's like 1:00 AM here and I really need some sleep)
 
   

 


 
 
acronymsical on
Re: StickyKeys
plenty of people hand-code stuff. you do exactly what you want and not something else. the real advancement in coding sites is in reusable code. i believe movable type does it. i'm not entirely sure about the various coding frameworks. i wrote my own about three years ago and it has combined with a couple of different templating engines and databases in the intervening years. in any case, if you can write a piece of html only once and use it over and over, modifying it becomes far easier because you only have to change and debug it once.
sirwhilms on
Re: StickyKeys
Precisely... I'm currently working on my own PHP Content Managment System as an alternative to things like PHP-Nuke. The advantage here is that, for every file I write (I write files for each function of the CMS that can be included anywhere), I can use it a bazillion times over.

For the interested, my CMS would be better for people who aren't total idiots, and want an easy to manage website that inhabits whatever layout you should choose to use (rather than something like Nuke which needs to be skinned).
acronymsical on
Re: StickyKeys
skinning or templating makes life a lot easier, honestly. if you're really good, you can write it in such a way that the files common to most sites live under version control. that way if you ever find a bug in them (and you will), you can easily fix it everywhere with a one-liner. the idea is that you keep three things seperate from each other: code lives under version control (cvs) and each site checks out a copy that can be updated, data lives naturally in a database, and appearance lives in templates/skins that contain all the HTML. using this technique, it's possible to launch any number of sites built off the same premise, that may or may not use the same design. i learned it at a dot-com in san francisco where we hosted a few hundred sites built from a few basic designs, all of which shared little overlapping parts of a few hundred thousand pieces of data. think of how mindsay works. your blog lives in a database somewhere. their code lives in their code base, and they've even extended it so that templates/skins live in another database for the ultimate in reskinning any page at the touch of a button.
sirwhilms on
Re: StickyKeys
That's the basic idea behind the system. I have a central location for my code, and the content/data is all either DB or external (depending on what the situation is). The trick is, the entire design/appearence simply includes (and by includes I mean PHP include()s) a fetching script. That's why it isn't for total idiots- it takes a basic sense of what you're doing to complete. It simply adds a power to a basic website.

If I ever find myself with that kind of time, I could develop a basic-style version that lets you edit the style and layout of the pages and everything (skinning >_> but that's my second priority.
acronymsical on
Re: StickyKeys
you might take a google for something called TemplatePower. i wrote the original RW codebase in that, and my personal site (which is of the same vintage -- 2003ish) still runs it. when i recoded RW in late 2004, i did it with a more powerful and faster compiling template engine called smarty. smarty has a bit of a learning curve, but templatepower should take you no more than 15 minutes to figure out from scratch. editing templates can be done either by hand or in wysiwyg editors because they're really just modified html. beware of syntax errors in the templates. there are no error messages, just blankness.
acronymsical on
Re: StickyKeys
also check out version control with a tool called CVS. it keeps track of changes you make, added/deleted files, and will let you roll back a change you didn't mean to make. again, there's a bit of a learning curve, as with most tools that were developed for unix, but the benefits abound. plus it's industry standard, so if you want to do this later...
sirwhilms on
Re: StickyKeys
Gar, Smarty. I'm well aware of that learning curve. I'll take a look-see at CVS, I've heard of it but never bothered.

 
Login to replyToggle picture size
 

Latest Comment
Re: Should I deactivate my facebook until exams are over? - Gave my friend the password and she's changed...

Read...


 
© 2005-2007 MindSay Interactive LLC
| Terms of Service
| Privacy Policy
My Account
Inbox
Account Settings
Lost Password?
Logout
Blog
Update Blog
Edit Old Entries
Pick a Theme
Customize Design
Modify Plugins
Community
Your Profile
Wiki Pages
MindSay Tags
Video & Photos
Geographic Directory
Inside MindSay
About MindSay
MindSay and RSS
Report Spam
Contact Us
Help