The war on christmas should really be called the war on consideration.  I was discussing an issue online with teachers about the ethics involved in sending Christmas cards to students.  I advised her that while you may feel very strongly in your personal life about particular beliefs and feel it is appropriate to express those feelings in certain ways, those same expressions may become inappropriate in your public role as a teacher. It may be viewed as an opportunistic abuse of your position if you take it upon yourself to express your personal beliefs to those whose social relationship to you is based exclusively on the mandatory student-teacher relationship.

I also made a point that I think should be made much more often.  Those who make waves standing up for equal recognition in the face of the Judeo-Christian majority are the ones most often heard about.  However, I would be willing to guess that for every one person of non-christian or non-theistic background that demands recognition of their equal status, there are a hundred that sit in silence, every Christo-centric reference reminding them they are an outsider, they are different, and suggesting their beliefs are not valid. 

Which is why I believe it is really a war on consideration.  Telling someone Merry Christmas is prejudicial.  It is making an assumption that the person you are addressing recognizes and accepts the traditions and particular mythologies that you do.  If that is the case and you know it, then it is perfectly reasonable.  If you are uncertain, it is just considerate to be more generic, acknowledge that not everyone conforms to the same beliefs.  Seasons Greetings or Happy Holidays are not assaults on the Christian faithful.  They're polite remarks by thoughtful people who have taken into consideration the pluralistic nature of our society and shows tolerance and a true reaching out for cooperation despite difference.  If you meet a large woman that you suspect is pregnant, it is generally polite to not mention it until you know for sure.  After all, she may just be rather large.  And unless you are completely callous toward the feelings of others, you would like to avoid such a disparaging remark.  Being inclusive in a holiday greeting is no more an attack on christmas than opening letter with "Dear sir or madam" is an assault on gender identification. 

I firmly believe that some of the same people (not all) who complain about the "war" on Christmas, or find themselves griping about censorship in the name of being politically correct and that their rights are being restricted would be complaining the loudest if every February I sent out Darwin Day cards celebrating the Theory of Evolution. And the funny thing is, an argument can be made that Darwin Day cards would actually have an educational component and no religious overtones so perhaps would be more appropriate for the classroom.

Nevertheless, I am sure some who feel it is their right to be pro-christmas regardless of others in almost every facet of their life, including the classroom would suddenly want to restrict my voice even though the idea being promoted is a scientific fact rather than a particular faith.

The war on christmas crowd is really just a bunch of people who enjoy a power trip.  They believe that they are absolutely right and anyone who thinks differently should basically just get over it, leave, or keep their mouth shut.  Christmas is basically a commercialized crock at this point anyway.  I wonder sometimes how many of these blowhards are just hypocrites who want to be contrarians and bigots and look for an outlet that they feel makes them just seem exceedingly pious.  You know, when you complain that Happy Holidays as a phrase is a part of some secular agenda to restrict Christian presence in American society, you just end up looking like an asshole.  But some of these are the same people who see the word "tolerant" as a code word for homosexuality and evil.  To those people I have a message:

You can't bully people into respecting your beliefs. You can't force the world to conform to your fantasy. You can't prove your love to your kids with excessive consumer spending. You can't prove devotion to your faith by screaming the loudest. You can't say you're not a bigot while disparaging others on the basis of religion, sex or ethnicity.  You can't be a martyr in a majority.  You can't go back to the way it was because it was never the way you think it was.   I am sorry  that the world  is so scary and unpredicatable with individuals who may think you are wrong about some pretty important things in your life.  I know it is hard to accept that you might not have found all the answers while in little league.  It really sucks to be of simple mind in a complex world, but it is time as they say, to "man-up" and face your fears.  It's time to deal with the real world on real terms and quit playing good guys/bad guys, stop making up stories to get your way, and put away the army men.  I am sorry, but there is no Santa.  Have a Merry F-ing' Kwanzhanukristmas Holiday.

The Southern Fried Skeptic
 
   

 


 
 
justjames on
Re: The War on Consideration
Great post, I think the whole "war on Christmas" is a joke. Just a way to get the base in a frenzy. I always wonder how to respond to the nice Indian people who own a convenience store that I visit. I guess I should just ask them.
sifa on
Re: The War on Consideration
Bravo!  I'm not Christian, but I don't really care if someone wishes me a Merry Christmas.  I just say Happy Holidays back to them. 

But I agree with your post in principle.  It's just not that important to me in every day life to argue with someone over some careless, not-thought-about words.  And I don't do Christmas Cards because I never remember to mail them *grin*.
audienceofone on
Re: The War on Consideration
Two points:

1.  You make some gross generalizations here.  Connecting pro-Christmas with power, discourteousness, excessive consumer spending, and homophobia ... please!

2.  In so doing, you are guilty of the exact travesty for which you blame them.

 

As sifa  says below ... there is no harm done either way if one simply & politely greets in their own fashion.  Tolerance is not the absence of beliefs, but respect for those of different beliefs.  As in most cases, knowledge, rather than silence,  breeds understanding.  Sterilization is not the answer, particularly in the classroom!

secularsouth on
Re: The War on Consideration
I am not advocating that in private conversation each person should be required to use non-specific holiday greetings. I think doing so when encountering someone whose personal beliefs are unknown to you is a polite gesture, but everyone is entitled to conduct themselves as they feel is proper.  However, in the case of a public school teacher sending out cards to her students, I don't think she should be ashamed of her beliefs nor have any undue restrictions on her expression of them in her personal life. But with those whose social relationship with the teacher is solely or predominately based upon the teacher-student relationship, the sending of greeting cards would be most appropriate if sent with a broad, generalized message of good will, rather than emphasizing the specific beliefs of the individual teacher.

You know, a simple litmus test might be to ask yourself the following.

If I send cards saying Merry Christmas am I sending a message inclusive for those who don't celebrate Christmas? No

If I send cards saying Happy Holidays am I sending a message inclusive for those wo do celebrate Christmas? Yes

The former excludes every non-christian and even some christians. The latter includes everyone during the holiday season regardless of traditional origins or cultural differences. If your goal is to truly reach out and send a message of happiness and cheer, why not choose the option that is most inclusive and if you want to promote a spirit of togetherness, why not choose the option that recognizes differences in cultural interpretation of the holiday season and illustrates a respect for those differences? Choosing the option to send the cards that specifically highlight your personal beliefs would seem to me to be sent less in a spirit of comraderie and more an assertive statement, or a spirit of defiance. After all, "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" includes those who do celebrate Christmas. So the only sacrifice you are making in choosing a more general greeting is that you are not allowing the imposition of your specific belief to overshadow an underlying genuine expression of love, togetherness, and hope.

In my post I was specifically addressing those who get extremely bent out of shape and the mention of a department store saying happy holidays or school choosing to keep its holiday activities more generally inclusive rather than limit them to a focus based on one particular religious group's tradition. 

Private citizens can infuse their lives with all the Christmas accouterments they choose and I support their right to do so.
If a private business chooses to put forth a broad message of "Season's Greetings" or "Happy Holidays" in recognition of the plurality of our culture, then I support their right also.  Those who want to boycott or make political bluster about such a choice are some of those I am referring to.  Complaining about a private business making a choice to recognize a diversity of beliefs during the holiday season is essentially saying, "I am right in what I believe and if you don't recognize that and only that, I will be angry and try to punish you." 

In the public forum, since we are all equal citizens, no individuals rights should trump another's.  If acknowledgement is made toward a particular group and their beliefs, then any other citizen with another belief should also be recognized, otherwise their beliefs are being treated as less valid.  Since it is impractical to represent every view, it is best to just abstain from involving public institutions in the promotion of particular beliefs, unless it can be done in a way that is clearly all-inclusive. 

Every other house can have all the decorations and nativity scenes and what-not they want (and in some places more than every other house does) and I would support their right to do so.  Every church yard can be filled with images of its mythology and religious symbols galore.  Many do and I also support their right to do so.  Everywhere one turns during this time of year there is religious symbolism and expression of belief.  I would say I support 95% of as appropriate and absolutely within the rights afforded to us.  The asshole factor comes in when it is obvious that expression of personal belief is widespread and usually absolutely acceptable to those who have different views on the holidays, but when one small portion of society is a bit controversial, whether a public school having a "winter break" instead of a "christmas break" or a private business choosing to say "happy holidays" instead of "merry christmas", a certain segment of the population wants to get up in arms and claim victimization and oppression.  Isn't it enough to have nativity scenes, christmas signs, trees, lights, etc.. up and down every block?  It seems that they won't be satisfied until they have blanketed every aspect of society and squashed any other expression or recognition of alternate interpretations of this time of year.

 
Login to replyToggle picture size
 

Latest Comment
Re: sex and the married guy - I've been married for 20 years, I'd rather not discuss my sex life, but casual...

Read...


 
© 2005-2007 MindSay Interactive LLC
| Terms of Service
| Privacy Policy
My Account
Inbox
Account Settings
Lost Password?
Logout
Blog
Update Blog
Edit Old Entries
Pick a Theme
Customize Design
Modify Plugins
Community
Your Profile
Wiki Pages
MindSay Tags
Video & Photos
Geographic Directory
Inside MindSay
About MindSay
MindSay and RSS
Report Spam
Contact Us
Help