Cows get them.  Pets get them.  People get them.  Some of us even give them to our possessions.

Brands.  Tattoos.  Serial numbers.

Marks. 

Now, you may think that tattoos are just body decoration, but they are also used as identifying marks.  You can recognize someone, sometimes, merely by a picture of an image inked into their skin. If a corpse is found, tattoos can be used to help identify the person.  So, yes, tattoos can be marks of identification.

People have used marks for eons, for many reasons, to show belonging to many things.  But I do not believe any mark of identification has come under such thought, scrutiny, study, contempt, or even irate denial as "the mark of the beast." 

Revelation 13:11-18
11 Then I saw another beast coming up out of the earth; he had two horns like a lamb, but he sounded like a dragon. 12 He exercises all the authority of the first beast on his behalf and compels the earth and those who live on it to worship the first beast, whose fatal wound was healed. 13 He also performs great signs, even causing fire to come down from heaven to earth before people. 14 He deceives those who live on the earth because of the signs that he is permitted to perform on behalf of the beast, telling those who live on the earth to make an image of the beast who had the sword wound yet lived. 15 He was permitted to give a spirit to the image of the beast, so that the image of the beast could both speak and cause whoever would not worship the image of the beast to be killed. 16 And he requires everyone--small and great, rich and poor, free and slave--to be given a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, 17 so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark: the beast's name or the number of his name. 18 Here is wisdom: The one who has understanding must calculate the number of the beast, because it is the number of a man. His number is 666.

The "beast from the sea" was introduced already in this book.  I believe he will be the antichrist, prophesied long ago.  In the verses above, we meet his priest, prophet, top promoter. Call him what you will, this person will be the one who will be given power to promote the worship of the antichrist as well as show displays of "miracles." 

That stuff will be minor, compared to his true impact on the world.

He is going to execute economic boycott on all who will not take a mark of identification.  A specific mark that shows that an individual belongs to the beast. 

Now, this mark has been speculated about for a very long time.  In first century Rome, numbers and names were interlinked, so that someone's name and number could be calculated by arcane formulae.  Nero has been one of those identified in such a way.  Domitian, remember, was emperor at the time of this writing; Nero had been killed long since.

Another name that can calculate to 666 is Latienos.  Latin would pertain to Rome, so if the antichrist or his promoter/prophet were closely associated with Rome, that would be reasonable, in light of this prophecy.  Another name that could equate to this number is the Hebrew letters of Balaam. Balaam is associated with the worship of false gods and/or Satanic rituals.

Other people see the number 666 as it relates to God's number of perfection and completion: 7. Or 777.  In this reasoning, the number 666 falls short of God's perfection and is seen as the world's number.

There are many interpretations.  The only one that will matter, though, is the one that ascribes the chooser of this mark to be aligned with the antichrist and his prophet.

Scripture is very clear, here.  If one does not accept this mark, one will not be allowed to buy and sell. I imagine this will extend to taxes and property ownership, as well.  Those who choose the mark will be able to live freely; those who do not, will not.

If you choose not to take the mark, you will have to make provision for your life.  Live off the grid.  Be entirely self-sufficient or work with others who have not been marked in order to eat.  It will not be easy. 

"This calls for wisdom," the Bible says.  It does.  John says this number is "man's number."  It is the number for those who think of their earthbound selves before they think of their eternal selves.  It is a self-serving number.  It is a mark of identification that will not ever be removed.  It is a permanent choice.

When the time comes, choose wisely.  Do not allow yourself to be identified as belonging to a nightmare.  Temporary inconvenience will be amply recompensed if you ally yourself to the true lamb of God, who is Jesus.  His mark will be on the soul and for some, on their foreheads.  His mark of identification will bring life. The other will bring death, eventually.  The choice will be yours. 

Choose wisely.
 
   

 


Comment Page: 1 2   [Next]
 
tootboy on
Re: The Mark
People of the Jewish faith are forbidden to have tattoos
Here's the reason: Leviticus 19:28, which states: “You shall not make gashes in your flesh for the dead, or incise any marks on yourselves: I am the Lord.”
sandyquill on
Re: The Mark
<smile> I had read that, yes.  My understanding of that passage is that it is also a mark of identification, really. Wherein a tattoo is used to show allegiance to a false god or to the dead. 

Me, I don't have any tattoos.  I do know some folks who do, though.  One man I know (not Spousal Unit, honest) got one when he was on a drunken binge in bootcamp.  Oops?
revcathian on
Re: The Mark
This will shock you, but 20+ years ago, after a very bad period of my life, I was hanging out with a girlfriend. We were talking about ways to make sure we didn't repeat the same mistakes twice. We were having a couple of drinks together - too many drinks for me, who was not really much of a drinker anyway - and she showed me a tattoo on her leg and her wrist - they were representative of freedom from something to her. Well, it seemed like a grand idea. So I got $15.00 and she took me to the tattoo parlor. I picked out a tiny butterfly to put over my left shoulder - representative of freedom. I even took advancing age into account, because I knew that even at 80 years old I would be wrinkled in a great many places, but certainly not on my shoulder - though that butterfly may end up halfway down my back, it won't be wrinkled!

 

Armed with such questionable wisdom, I proceeded to have a tattoo. It was awful. It was painful, and I almost threw up. But I was committed, and so we proceeded. It ended up being blue and yellow, in a black outline. Not bad. I was proud of it for a while - but kept it covered up for many years after that.

 

I know what it meant to me. But I was not thinking very clearly. I wasn't exactly walking in a good path at the time, either, and I would surely not do it now (nor would I have actually done it even a few months later). I don't recommend tattoos, either, because they are permanent. And I didn't even know about Leviticus 19:28, but for sure I wouldn't do that now just because the Lord forbids it.

 

I didn't then, and don't now, worship the "god of butterfly."  LOL  It was a personal statement, albeit a faulty reason, and a permanent one. We have a culture that accepts tattoos, and they are not always an indicator that there is something idolatrous about the recipients. I do agree, they are identifiers, and whenever I have to fill out a government survey (for security - Coast Guard stuff) I have to write down the fact that I have a butterfly tattoo over my left shoulder.

 

This was probably way off topic - sorry, Sandi.

sandyquill on
Re: The Mark
Not at all, dear. <smile>  So a tattoo AND Harley boots? <grin>  I am impressed.
revcathian on
Re: The Mark
hahahaha THAT deserves a phone call. Please answer your phone.
tootboy on
Re: The Mark
i'm not shocked...and not let it bother you.
revcathian on
Re: The Mark
Thanks, friend. That is not always the reaction I get. I appreciate it.
misterghoulie on
Re: The Mark
All three of Ronald Raegan's names had six letters, but since he was a good conservative republican there's no way he could have been the Beast.

And either way, the point of 666 is moot: The mark of the Beast is 616, not 666.  Whoever wrote your copy of the Bible forgot to carry the 2.

http://www.religionnewsblog.com/11134

 

sandyquill on
Re: The Mark
I had heard that about Reagan, yes.  Whoever this person is will be highly respected and widely regarded as a most excellent person.  And they won't show themselves to be adhering to any political party but their own, I'm pretty sure.

I just read about the 616 on a variant of a Greek translation, yes.  It is as yet a variant, though, and not fully accepted by everyone.  It may be, in the future. For now, I'll stick to what I have.  We're learning new things all the time, though. And if this number is shown to be 616, that will not change the message of this in the least, except that the interpretation of a personal identification may be a little off.  The mark, though, will have the same consequences for anyone who takes it. No matter WHAT number it may be.
misterghoulie on
Re: The Mark
And all I'm saying is, you're going to be expecting 666 to be branded to someone's forehead or right hand, but then get whopped up from your blindside by a 616 you didn't see coming.
sandyquill on
Re: The Mark
I'll make sure to keep an eye open for any and all brands heading toward my head or hand. Thank you. <smile>
semiomniscient on
Re: The Mark
I'm pretty sure, that when calculated properly (likely 616) is comes out equivilent to the examples Sandi gave.
sandyquill on
Re: The Mark
If this becomes an "issue" in replies, I may add this as an addendum to the lesson. <smile> Just to save having to type out the same thing again.  
semiomniscient on
Re: The Mark
I agree with your response to Adam.  But I think that whatever it is... the number is meant I think to represent Nero, whom early Christians may well have viewed as the devil incarnate.  Oh was that man ever a freak!  I heard he had his mother killed and her womb slit open because he wanted to see where he came from... Lit his garden with Christians burning on stakes... If any man in history could be the anti-christ, it'd be him.  On a personal level, he makes Hitler look like a mere immitator.
sandyquill on
Re: The Mark
One of the representations might have been him, but the antichrist will not be confined to history past, I believe.
semiomniscient on
Re: The Mark
Well time flows like a river, and history repeats... so they say.  I honestly don't know enough about eschatology to say what parts are past, what are present, what are future.  I'm certainly not a dispensationalist... not postmillenial or amillenial either.  I'm ofcourse not a hyper-preterist... but many of my favorite theologians (of whose Biblical scholarship I highly respect) take some preterist leanings (IE: much of apocalyptical Jesus sayings fulfilled in 70 A.D. with Jerusalem's destruction... but not the hyper-preterist affirmation that that was Christ's second coming).  I think much of Revelation had to do with what was going on in those days... and I think that those early Christians understood much better those visions than we do today.
sandyquill on
Re: The Mark
I think they did speak to times back then, but I also believe they speak to us, today.  This, remember, is God's last word to his people, and last words are important. Also, he has promised a blessing for those who study this book. I don't think he meant only for those in the first century churches. I think it speaks to all people, across time...

But I also think it speaks to us in this time.  Specifically.
semiomniscient on
Re: The Mark
Oh, I believe and understand all of God's word applies and speaks to us today.  Especially this one.  But I don't understand this one... I try... but I'm very wary of making assertions as fact like I've seen some do (not you, but some hellfire brimstone guys who say things that come off arrogant). 

End times... are now...

It's been so since the Ascension.  The Apostles have held that so, and I believe Lord Christ asserted that as well.

culdeedeacon on
Re: The Mark
JAMES! You're a Preterist? I thought you were a Historical Premillennialist?!

CuldeeDeacon +
sandyquill on
Re: The Mark
So long as he's a Christ-follower, the rest of it will follow.
semiomniscient on
Re: The Mark
Ehh... I wouldn't put all preterists into a Christ-followers category...   I think a wholesale preterist view is heretical.
sandyquill on
Re: The Mark
I confess I am not "hep" to all the labels of arrangements since I left the Dutch Reformed church when I was twenty.  I did get into eschatology in college, but only in terms of the Pauline letters.  My study on revelation hasn't led me to labels as much as it has to scriptural precedent.
semiomniscient on
Re: The Mark
I'm not a preterist.  But I think some Scriptural prophecy (of the apocalyptic genre) refers to things that have already occured... I definitely think SOMEthing happened in 70 AD of  Biblical mention.  But I'm definitely not a perterist in any whole sense of the word...  And I don't think I quite fit into Historical Premillenial too much either... but perhaps more closely than anything else.
christianisrael on
Re: The Mark
It does seem like those who take this mark are doing more than just making a decision out of financial necessity--there is worship involved--verse 15--before the mark is given. Those who don't worship him will be slain.
I've often wondered how this mark could be applied and how it would affect the millions in China, India, SE Asia, where technology is unavailable and commerce is done in cash. However, lots of changes can come in twenty or thirty years. What has happened with the internet has occurred in a little over ten years, if memory serves.
revcathian on
Re: The Mark
Hi Jim,

I know this is still at the speculation stage, but with the advances of radio chip implants, it could easily be done. They are injected via syringe, and the device is the size of a grain of rice. Mike and I were having this discussion yesterday, and although the RFID chips are not visible because they are implanted, there may be some other feature that is visible to those who look to the right hand or the forehead. It may not be the way it is done, but after doing research on it, it certainly seems portable, simple and available. It would be less painful than piercing your ears, and I could just see "humanitarian" efforts reaching out to the places where the technology is unavailable. Just a thought, and by no means a definitive answer.

christianisrael on
Re: The Mark
Less painful than a butterfly tatoo?  Smiley
Ok, maybe this isn't a laughing matter.
revcathian on
Re: The Mark
LOL too late.
sandyquill on
Re: The Mark
She called me and was chuckling before I even said hello.
semiomniscient on
Re: The Mark
For some reason, I think the RFID chips are the vinyl records of their technological genre... I'm thinking something like an exterior ink (similar to a tattoo, but applied differently) will have the effect that the microchip has.  Either way, I will NEVER have any chip implanted inside me.  But they're slowly conditioning us to it with credit cards... cash is going out of style... FAST!
sandyquill on
Re: The Mark
Cash...? What is this cash you speak of? 


semiomniscient on
Re: The Mark
Well... I'm sorry but he's dead.  But he did teach us something important... "Get rhythm, when you get the blues, c'mon get rhythm, when you get the blues!"

sandyquill on
Re: The Mark
Well, yes, but what I see happening is that those who will be undecided might choose to take this mark out of necessity.  It will make them belong, fit in, be viable.

And, too, I believe that for these leaders, no technology will be too far out of reach or too hard to implement. They will simply "make it so."  After all, everyone in the world will move at their will.
revcathian on
Re: The Mark
I wanted to add that he will also make war with the saints, and kill many of them. Many will not be prepared for what is to come, because they simply think they will not be here; they are the ones I fear for. There will be a great falling away, and many who once mouthed the word "Christian" in reference to themselves, will be deceived - they will worship the beast and his image. We have to remember that this involves worship - not just a mark. There may be precursors to that "mark" to get people desensitized to it, and I really think this is true. But when the time comes, there will be no mistaking it - we will have to worship in order to receive. No accidents there. Like you said, prayerful consideration is needed.
heartstudio on
Re: The Mark
Be still.  So much energy spent on "what ifs." And is this what the Lord really wants of us?  Have Awareness, stay awake, fear not, and just be still.  He is always with us and in us, providing we have repented and accepted Him as our Savior.  If I die for choosing Christ, then I have a fuller life! 
sandyquill on
Re: The Mark
I believe in making preparation against the times to come.  My heart is heavy with concern for those who will, like the foolish virgins of Jesus' parable, not be ready when it is time. 

The Lord wants children who are vigilant, trusting, and loving him so much as not to shrink from death.  I can only hope to do my part.  <smile>  Things are going to get ugly, but we have been warned.
heartstudio on
Re: The Mark
True.  I see what you are calling others to see and do. Yes, it will get ugly, downright terrifying. No sense wallowing in what is yet to come.  Every day is a gift.  For me, training and shepherding is not in instilling fear, but in growing more faithful, and in discerning the truthful from the liar.  It can only be done by remaining in Him.  "I am the vine, you are the branches, and all who live in me and remain in me will bear much fruit." I know my Lord and Savior died so that I may have life, more abundantly, and by my in living in Him, and that is how I will naturally show others the way.  I guess I concieve of showing others to be ready in a way that is joyful and contagious, realistic, preparational, and inviting.  See, there is enough gloom and doom and destruction in today for a galaxy of worlds, I know, but I strongly sense that Jesus does not want me calling his lost sheep back to Him with more and more warnings that get lost in the din of this world, but to use the sound of His voice- a joyful sound they'll know.  It's the "catch more flies with honey" way, I guess. 

 

 I just have grown more and more wary of "worriers" because of a recent run of cancer in my family.  My Sister has just recovered from breast cancer, and is still in remission-so far.   We have a mom who is always worrying, incessantly worrying. Yes, she is a christian, and she says she believes and "prays"  but... her worrying is like cancer to us all.  It just grows and grows with every "Debbie Downer" conversation she starts.  It is like a tar of negativity, tough to cleanse off of your spirit, and sometimes it just festers within us from that point on.   Where it came from, who can tell, her parents weren't like that.  I guess you could say my heart is heavy for her (my Mom's) sake.  Talking about the end just eggs her on more, and there's no end to it.   So, I am very sensitized to that wildfire approach, and if it takes a bucket of water now and then, well I have my bucket full and on the ready, ya know? 

 

To just Be still, and ask for His take on what my part is, and Listen to and obey his instruction- on what part I must do, that is my philosophy.  No matter how much some people are warned, they may never heed, never get the lamp oil in time.  It doesn't mean we have failed them or God.  A person has to see the need to change and personally make that choice from within- nobody can cause them to make that choice.  I just haven't noticed that any of the "foolish" are really focused on the finish line as much as they are on the track or the runners around them.  I think if I were to make a real influential difference, it would be in my running amongst them, maintaining my pace and focus.  Parables were used as pallatable, entertainment- and still are to get that medicine to go down - and to get the stiff-necked fools to make a connection about their foolish ways, see the need to make the change, and make that change within.  I am more the storyteller, I guess, than the one standing out and yelling "beware of the beast".  Reality is he's everywhere.  But-Because of Jesus' death and resurrection, we've been given power and authority over that.  Jesus reigns.  That is just my take on it. 

sandyquill on
Re: The Mark
My part, given to me by God, is to tell people what is going to be happening.  I know this beyond doubting it.  He told me years ago and has taught me over the past twenty years what I would need to know to teach people.  <smile>

So whereas I do not worry...I have nothing to worry about...I am concerned.  Many Christians do not take the warnings here seriously.  I am all for catching flies with honey, but our God is not a honey-coated God. He is also the God of plagues, fire, and the Big Boot of Judgment.

We have been given strength to fight the Accuser.  But not everyone will recognize who he is when he comes, and that will be a tragedy. 
heartstudio on
Re: The Mark
It is all in the recognition and discernment, and you are so right about not all will recognize who he is when he comes, or that they have been given power and authority through Christ, in time.  I'm all for teaching, carry on!  
sarcasmsvoice on
Re: The Mark
To be honest, I think that you have all missed the obvious. You are looking for a number that comes in shortened form. You are looking for some number that marks each and every person. A number that you cannot live without.

Wake up!...we already have one of those that each and every one of you already has. A number that tracks your movements, your lives, your hospital visits, your money, and just about everything else you touch. It's called the SSN. Conveniently 3 letters as well. I suggest you review your looking parameters because the groundwork for the mark is quite sufficiently layed.
sandyquill on
Re: The Mark
Oh, I completely believe that the groundwork is laid. The technology exists. All it requires is implementation.

The actual marking, though, will require an act of allegiance. It won't be assigned to us as babies, I don't believe.  We will have to make a choice.

Comment Page: 1 2   [Next]
Login to replyToggle picture size
 

Latest Comment
Re: So..We'll give you your term "marriage"..but it won't be enough-will it? - You are a fool. If you are...

Read...


 
© 2005-2007 MindSay Interactive LLC
| Terms of Service
| Privacy Policy
My Account
Inbox
Account Settings
Lost Password?
Logout
Blog
Update Blog
Edit Old Entries
Pick a Theme
Customize Design
Modify Plugins
Community
Your Profile
Wiki Pages
MindSay Tags
Video & Photos
Geographic Directory
Inside MindSay
About MindSay
MindSay and RSS
Report Spam
Contact Us
Help