Before I get to my Super Bowl pick, I decided to give myself a small pat on the back for getting a few things right about the playoffs way back in September:

 

I had Philadelphia beating the Giants at home in the wild card round...which actually happened.

I had Indianapolis beating Kansas City at home in the second round...only one week late.

I had Indianapolis beating New England at home in the AFC title game...which actually happened.

 

I just needed to stick to my guns instead of changing everything these last few weeks.  Nonetheless, on we go to the big game.

 

Indianapolis vs. Chicago

Colts win, 27-13.

 

The toughest part of predicting this matchup is trying to figure out what type of a game it will be.  Chicago obviously wants a low-scoring defensive struggle whereas the Colts want a track meet.  Who will be able to dictate the pace?

 

What it comes down to is Indy's Cover 2 defense.  This defense is built to stop big plays; the defensive backs are taught to keep evertything in front of them.  This applies to Chicago because the Bears offense is only effective when they can make big plays down the field.  Rex cannot beat a team trying to dink and dunk his way down the field, he just is not consistently accurate with his throws.  Without the ability to get the ball deep to Bernard Berrian and Muhsin Muhhamad, Chicago's offense will struggle against the Colts' surprisingsly stingy run defense.

 

Of course, the matchup everyone really cares about is Indy's offense against Chicago's defense.  Last week the Colts scored 38 points against a New England defense that had always shut him down in the past.  Here are some interesting comparisons between New England's defense and Chicago's defense during the regular season:

            

             -Chicago gave up an average of 99 rush yards and 195 pass yards

               per game.

               New England gave up an average of 94 rush yards per game and

               200 pass yards per game.

 

             -Chicago gave up a total of 258 first downs: 77 rushing, 159

               passing, and 22 due to penalty.

               New England gave up a total of 264 first downs: 67 rushing, 164

               passing, 33 on penalties.

 

             -Chicago had 24 interceptions.

               New England had 22 interceptions.

 

Those seem to be some pretty similar numbers.  On top of all of that, Chicago's pass rush will be limited without Tommie Harris while their pass defense tries to cope without veteran Pro Bowler Mike Brown.  All of that adds up to Peyton at least having a good day.  Combine that with a defense that picks of two passes and Peyton gets his first Super Bowl.

 

As always, comments, critiques and suggested topics are welcome by replying here or by emailing me at KONsports@yahoo.com.

 
   

 


 
 
elisa9 on
Re: Super Bowl
Pat your back all you want but da' Bears will do it on Sunday.  Why, you well may ask?  Because the Colts are the better team on paper.  So were the Chargers.  Paper is used in offices.  Football is played out in the open, sometimes under roofs, but still no desks on a football field.  Da' Bears are the underdog and they know they will have to play their best to win.  The Colts expect to win so they won't expect to have to play their best.  And you know how that kind of mental relaxation bites one in the glute.  It won't be an obvious blow-out type win.  But when the half-time smoke finally clears, Chicago will be holding the trophy.  With your roots, you should know that.

Urant
konsports on
Re: Super Bowl
My roots?  My roots tell me the team that is better on paper will win.  The Niners were better "paper teams" for at least 4 of their 5 championships. 

Sure, there are upsets on occassion.  New England over St. Louis in Super Bowl XXXVI is a perfect example (of course, two more titles show that the Pats were better than everyone realized).  In general, however, the team that is better on paper wins.

Looking at every Super Bowl from the 1984 season until the 2001 season, there appears to have been a clear favorite (I didn't include the most recent years because the teams have been similar in terms of talent).  These favorites include, in chronological order: San Francisco ('84), Chicago ('85), N.Y. Giants ('86), Washington ('87), San Francisco ('88), San Francisco ('89), N.Y. Giants ('90), Washington ('91), Dallas ('92), Dallas ('93), San Francisco ('94), Dallas ('95), Green Bay ('96), Green Bay ('97), Denver ('98), St. Louis ('99), Baltimore ('00), St. Louis ('01).  One or two of those is debatable, but mostly these were all clear favorites heading into their respective games.  Of these 18 teams, only 2 lost: Green Bay in 1997 and St. Louis in 2001.

You're right, games aren't played on paper, but history points to the paper favorite winning more often than not.

swelldance on
Re: Super Bowl
NFC all the way baby!  You should listen to Urant!  4north has swung to the dark side.... Smiley
konsports on
Re: Super Bowl
But should I listen because she makes a good argument or because you just happen to agree with her?
swelldance on
Re: Super Bowl
Yes
justjames on
Re: Super Bowl
I agree with your analysis. I've got the colts winning this one by a score of 31-17. A lot of people seem to be going with the Bears. I think the only reason that the Bears are in the Super Bowl is because the NFC was very weak this year.

 

Sorry Chicago, nothing against you. The Colts are just a better team.

elisa9 on
Re: Super Bowl
Thanks for making my point by citing the New England/St. Louis game.  New England was put down as an over-achieving bunch who couldn't win the big one.  Guess again.  Da' Bears are held in similar low esteme, to the Colts' detrement.  There are some cupcake teams in both leagues, one residing in our fair Bay Area, and the NFC has a larger proportion of them.  But there are some tough, nasty, tallented teams as well.  Momentum and team cohession make a difference in games where there's a true contest between tallents, I mention San Diego again.  I think the Colts have peaked early and da' Bears are still rising.  Keep the faith.

Urant
swelldance on
Re: Super Bowl
well 29-17 is pretty close to 27-13 - so GOOD JOB!!

 
Login to replyToggle picture size
 

Latest Comment
Re: - Oh that's good to hear, being home for Christmas morning that's important! Especially with a little boy...

Read...


 
© 2005-2007 MindSay Interactive LLC
| Terms of Service
| Privacy Policy
My Account
Inbox
Account Settings
Lost Password?
Logout
Blog
Update Blog
Edit Old Entries
Pick a Theme
Customize Design
Modify Plugins
Community
Your Profile
Wiki Pages
MindSay Tags
Video & Photos
Geographic Directory
Inside MindSay
About MindSay
MindSay and RSS
Report Spam
Contact Us
Help