I found a pretty descent website on the candidates...Sorry.. I forget the address but oh well.. still pretty cool. It listed 13 issues and gave the candidates views on all of them. Try googling "compare presidential candidates"... It was like the 5th one down but there were a few others out there that weren't too bad. There are a few things that matter a lot to me like the war, stem cell research, gay marriage and most of all global warming. I refuse to waiver on these issues...the others just aren't as important to me but maybe they should be. See ya!

Gary O

It always reminds me of "Brokeback (Mountain)"!

I agree with that. I found it really amusing that so many of the candidates took a "moral" stance while vacating their own morals by the out right lies and mistruths they spouted.

Alan Keyes for instance was all about "moral America". But he had no plan that would step by step fix things. He worked only in generalities.

Brownback was an obvious stuffed shirt. Almost every comment was "That is a hard question. Thank you for asking it." It was disgusting the way he patronized everyone

Huckabee had good answers but it was obvious that he was working off the assumption that he was there for votes only and not because he had any interest in upholding the Constitution or the rule of law.

Tancredo was a good man on most issues but a very weak speaker.

As always, Ron Paul had a good plan and a good method of supporting his comments. It was definitely between Huckabee and Paul. Though based on applause, I'm saying Paul won.

It was a very Paul friendly audience. I knew it was going to be a good night as soon as he walked on stage. It's great to hear him get the loudest applause.

 

It seemed that some of the other candidates were pandering to the crowd while Paul delivered the same message he always delivers.

 

By the way, I enjoyed your smackdown of old man neocon on RV's blog. He acted like the Patriot Act is the word of God.