Two of the girls I  know  are  spending  their holiday  on at least three  different  dates. Both  are going their own way, the dates are not in each other's company, but they  both joined the same  'date service'.   I  looked over the application they filled out, the pictures they  had  taken  for the review (one actually had  her cheerleader uniform from USC on) and got a dirty, catty reply  when I  asked if I misunderstood 'date service'  for 'escort service'.

 

The idea is to meet the ideal man, who shares your  same interests and goals. Oh, and who  just so happens to be rich and got the bucks.

 

These  girls are in their 20's and have the  looks, and the  experience, the guys  are looking  for.  Are the  guys asking to see your financial score? No, they  explained. They  were  honest and said they didn't have a lot of resources yet. Of course the men,  older and  already in their  careers, have much more  detailed financial sheets.  It  was explained to me that the men  are carefully  screened for  having made good  decisions and  not being deadbeats (money wise  that  is).

 

One girl is  very beautiful but not 'endowed' with a bust line. I  asked if she only  got  to  meet men of a  certain income?   The bigger the bust,  or the younger the  woman, the higher level of  man she got to meet.  In fact, the men  can be screened according  to financial status, just being careful to understand that you're competing  with  other  women (who share the  same spiritual interests) that have 'things' (body and experience)  to  offer a man.  

 

Now, that said. Wouldn't they be hurt and offended if a  man looked  at  them  based upon money  and looks? No, apparently not.  They were  truthful, they have no money (but do have pictures of them  in cheerleader uniforms  expressing, uhhh? ) and  all they have is similar  interests.

 

I hear women, talk  to women, including  older (more mature) women who  while they  still have  something a  man wants  from them, are  desperately  searching for "Mr.Right"    but,  who happens to have lots of  money, won't  demand a lot from them  (i.e.sex) and who  is older.    He's  raised his children,  needs a trophy  wife and her children are someone else's  problem.  It may  sound like a broad net,  but its not,  not really.

 

Women are seeking trophy husbands, qualified by the money they  can  spend on them, trading it  for sex.  I'm  shocked!!!    No,  but what does shock  me is,  the  women denying  it, that  they're trading themselves, selling what's between their legs and the  last  one  or two or  three  years of their  looks, for  money. The  guy must have money. 'I've already  worked and struggled'   I  was told,  now she wants  money.

 

If the men  are shopping, and paying, then I asked 'what happens when they  trade you in  for a younger wetter model?'   The answer?   Cash settlement, alimony, or (like one  woman in her 40's,  before everything  slips  further)  'he's older, and maybe  we'll  have  20 good years'.  Meaning, he's in his  60's  at least, not a lot  of sexual  duty, she can  cheat easily, and he  won't be shopping  for pussy much  longer.  Then she'll inherit as much of the estate  as she can endear  herself  too.

 

All  of this begs  one question,  'where  is love and happiness  and being full of someone  in your  heart?'  My so  very  naive  statement is based  on this,  'if you're using money  money money for  a qualifier then you are not open to  love, you're not faithful  (some have proved this point) and you're in the worlds oldest profession.

 

My mother still says 'just  as easy to  fall for a  man with  money, rather than a poor one'.  Still says  it,  although  my dad (she's the love  of his life)  wasn't a rich man.  He worked hard and took care  of her. See the  thing  is,  the guys with  money money  money, they fucked  and left.  They got  their fill  and since they were paying for it,  bought it somewhere else.

 

Shouldn't love, sharing a life be based  on something besides 'size'? (Size of the bank  account!)

 

No. No  one wants to struggle or have to  scrimp.  We all want  homes, vacations and certainly things to  play  with and things  that are an expense.  But  what happens  when  you 'I've already  been through  that. Building and working' and you  leave anyway, for  more  money?

 

Since the guy  is  paying  for you,  he must  care about you? Right?  After all,  he's invested between your legs and  wants to  protect it. Right?  Or will he  just  buy  another,  tighter, wetter  one?  Hmmm?  )

 

Funny  thing is,  most of these women find themselves dumped,  never happy  or they  fall  for a guy  who fucks  great,  but has  no money.

 
   

 


 
 

 
Login to replyToggle picture size
 

Latest Comment
Re: Actually, a survey instead.: - holyshit over 500,000?! 200,000 is pretty good, it should stay in the top...

Read...


 
© 2005-2007 MindSay Interactive LLC
| Terms of Service
| Privacy Policy
My Account
Inbox
Account Settings
Lost Password?
Logout
Blog
Update Blog
Edit Old Entries
Pick a Theme
Customize Design
Modify Plugins
Community
Your Profile
Wiki Pages
MindSay Tags
Video & Photos
Geographic Directory
Inside MindSay
About MindSay
MindSay and RSS
Report Spam
Contact Us
Help