
Biofuels have their own pitfalls. Ethanol will never be a viable, effective alternative. It exists solely due to subsidies. Big oil likes ethanol because it takes a lot of oil to produce, from synthetic fertilizers to the energy to process it. Let's also remember how much diesel it takes to plant, spray, irrigate, and harvest corn, which itself is a nasty crop for the soil, especially in high yield applications on the corporate mono-crop facilities where much of it is grown for this.
Biodiesel is much more viable, but only to the point that it can fill the gap left by shrinking diesel fuel production, which would otherwise cripple American farm and freight industries.
That bastard Ted Kennedy is an example of why wind power is a long way off int widespread use. The wealthy in Washington, even the supposedly eco-friendly Dummycrats have an asinine not in my backyard approach to projects which could actually make a difference.
In Europe, with a little help from us, the struggle is still ongoing towards building a viable tokamak, and that's the future of power if we can shake Exxon-Mobile and have everyone on Capitol Hill butchered.
Biodiesel is much more viable, but only to the point that it can fill the gap left by shrinking diesel fuel production, which would otherwise cripple American farm and freight industries.
That bastard Ted Kennedy is an example of why wind power is a long way off int widespread use. The wealthy in Washington, even the supposedly eco-friendly Dummycrats have an asinine not in my backyard approach to projects which could actually make a difference.
In Europe, with a little help from us, the struggle is still ongoing towards building a viable tokamak, and that's the future of power if we can shake Exxon-Mobile and have everyone on Capitol Hill butchered.
You do know that fusion has been achieved here in the US right (with parts from the local junkyard)? The only problem is making it so the output power is greater than the input power.
Yes, I know.
But the next step toward viable fusion power is ITER, which is planned to be operational in 2016.
But the next step toward viable fusion power is ITER, which is planned to be operational in 2016.
True...Oh, BTW the US is one of the 7 participants in ITER.
And also, since when are you against companies and for government action? Aren't you a Libertarian? lol
And also, since when are you against companies and for government action? Aren't you a Libertarian? lol
I'm not a huge fan of corporations, because corporations would not exist as they do today without the government creating an environment where they have unnatural advantages.
And just because I'm a Libertarian leaning Republican doesn't mean I have to like corporate America.
And just because I'm a Libertarian leaning Republican doesn't mean I have to like corporate America.
If you can point to one person who fits a particular party or ideological stereotype, I can point to an idiot.
No thinking man can possibly fit into such a mold.
No thinking man can possibly fit into such a mold.
Like Chris Rock said, there's some things I'm conservative about, and there's some things I'm liberal about.
Something like that.
I associate most closely because I tend toward small government. Agricultural subsidies, which benefit the massive company farms rather than small farms which need the help, for instance, need to go. However I support government intervention to directly protect the environment and farmland from both urban/suburban sprawl and industrial damage. The former hasn't happened much, save for small parcels on the local and state level, and one of my dreams is that America will come to its senses within the next generation to take up the task of protecting every acre of American soil that is tillable before this older generation of farmers dies of old age. The average age of the American farmer is over 55 years old. We should force development corporations to redevelop land they've already destroyed, rather than pave over the farmland that will become ever more necessary as populations continue to grow. Without petroleum based fertilizers, the American ag industry would take a huge hit, and the diet of the American people would be forced to take a drastic shift from corn-based products to a diet consisting of more cereals and a lot more meat, which can be grazed on soil without reliance on fertilizer. Most people don't realize that corn takes tremendous amounts of nutrients out of the soil, and that very little of that ever comes back to the soil, as human waste is not recycled to any significant degree.
I have a hard time associating with the Dummycrats because I'm pro-gun, don't like the idea of a welfare state, and am fairly pro-life, and I have a hard time associating with the Republicunts because I'm against the war, tend to like the idea of not dumping toxins into the environment, and have no problem with extending the legal benefits granted heterosexuals to homosexual couples.
I associate most closely because I tend toward small government. Agricultural subsidies, which benefit the massive company farms rather than small farms which need the help, for instance, need to go. However I support government intervention to directly protect the environment and farmland from both urban/suburban sprawl and industrial damage. The former hasn't happened much, save for small parcels on the local and state level, and one of my dreams is that America will come to its senses within the next generation to take up the task of protecting every acre of American soil that is tillable before this older generation of farmers dies of old age. The average age of the American farmer is over 55 years old. We should force development corporations to redevelop land they've already destroyed, rather than pave over the farmland that will become ever more necessary as populations continue to grow. Without petroleum based fertilizers, the American ag industry would take a huge hit, and the diet of the American people would be forced to take a drastic shift from corn-based products to a diet consisting of more cereals and a lot more meat, which can be grazed on soil without reliance on fertilizer. Most people don't realize that corn takes tremendous amounts of nutrients out of the soil, and that very little of that ever comes back to the soil, as human waste is not recycled to any significant degree.
I have a hard time associating with the Dummycrats because I'm pro-gun, don't like the idea of a welfare state, and am fairly pro-life, and I have a hard time associating with the Republicunts because I'm against the war, tend to like the idea of not dumping toxins into the environment, and have no problem with extending the legal benefits granted heterosexuals to homosexual couples.
Quick Links
Latest Comment
Re: Boom - Oh, and I am sorry if I did make you cry. I dont like hurting people... but I know I did, and...
| Terms of Service
| Privacy Policy
food