While in D.C. , I went to a presentation at the Library of Congress titled "Avoiding the Fate of the Mayans". The speaker was a man named Tom Sever whose job title was NASA archeologist.  He talked about using satellite imagery in the non-visible range to identify the "footprint" of past civilizations.  The jungles of Central and South America do not lend themselves to easy exploration by land in search of ancient ruins.  It is now believed that the Mayan empire included a population far larger than previously believed- millions....   They found a way to manage the water supply in this area, farm the swamp lands, and divert water into collection areas to protect against years of drought.  This allowed them to survive the eventual climate change that they created through deforestation... for many years beyond what a population that size could endure today.

The current deforestation in this area is visible as razor-sharp political boundaries between countries that allow it and those that protect the rainforest.  The climate change is evident again.  The talk was fascinating.

The statement that haunts me, though, came at the end of this speech....
Mr Sever told of how he was asked to teach a class at a university... how he was sure it would be overlooked, convinced that young people would not be interested in this new realm of archeology and ecology.  Quite the contrary, however, he found that the of few people who took his initial class- half changed their majors to environmental studies and the popularity of the class exploded to where he is now teaching four sections.  He says that it reminds him of the 60s- of the enthusiasm for making a difference through the impact we are having on our planet- on our futures.

People our age (my age), he said, often have an optimistic, unconcerned view of the situation... an attitude he attributed to a lack of investment in more than a foreseeable future- the 20 years or so they have left here.....
young people, on the other hand, see the importance and urgency of making a difference for the many years they have ahead of them!

I HAVE been relatively unconcerned... convinced, I thought, that human intelligence will see us through whatever dilemmas we find ourselves facing... that we will find a way to correct and move on.  I saw this optimism as one of experience and confidence in the human race.... is it, instead, a product of my own subconscious sense of mortality?  Do I discount the impact I could have on a new generation ready to spring into action because I am not concerned for change in my lifetime?

In my classes I have seen students approach environmental issues with a nonchalance and lack of interest.... they look at the information as one more thing to "remember".  I have been discouraged at the challenge of convincing them that the green movement is worth their time.   The "me" generation seem unconcerned about carbon footprints or potential remedies.

Perhaps I need to devote more energy into sparking the realization that they can each make a difference- that the condition of the world in their lifetime depends on what we do NOW. 

Maybe I need to be more concerned about what I can do to make the world a better chance for my grandchildren.....   Maybe I need to rethink my optimism.
 
   

 


 
 

 
Login to replyToggle picture size
 

Latest Comment
Re: Actually, a survey instead.: - lol every time I go to Home Depot it takes me forever to find anything.

Read...


 
© 2005-2007 MindSay Interactive LLC
| Terms of Service
| Privacy Policy
My Account
Inbox
Account Settings
Lost Password?
Logout
Blog
Update Blog
Edit Old Entries
Pick a Theme
Customize Design
Modify Plugins
Community
Your Profile
Wiki Pages
MindSay Tags
Video & Photos
Geographic Directory
Inside MindSay
About MindSay
MindSay and RSS
Report Spam
Contact Us
Help