
I wonder if that old guy ever thought the same thing when he was younger and perhaps helping someone in a fix.
In any case, it's been my experience that when I need someone, there's someone there for me, and I try to be there for people when they need me. Regardless of how incredibly dumb they are, most people at least have basic empathy, provided your skin is the same color as theirs at least.
No, I don't buy the premise I think you are suggesting.
I read someone time and time again getting a feel for their personality before I ever make a personal comment.
But if I respond to an issue that is presented, I am reacting to the argument, not to the person behind it.
I enjoy the instant feedback from others and assume it deals with my post not of their opinion of me.
That first contact is not couched in any sense of "This is who I am, and this is what I believe . . ." it is simply "this is what I think about what you think".
I'm fine with that. Of course the pleasure comes from the successive communication where I DO learn more about that person and can put his or her earlier comment to me in perspective. Obviously, it is more embarassing to realize someone I might think I have a connection with has an opinion the polar opposite of mine, (or that someone I do not respect has a similar viewpoint as mine, LOL!) but hey, that comes later - blogging, like real life encounters, holds the potential of sparking a continuing dialogue and is not just an in-your-face love me or hate me.
I really don't get your point, forgive me. Are you suggesting that if you DID know more about this man, and you did not agree with his thoughts or lifestyle you would not have reacted as caringly as you did? Saying less may be less provocative, but I don't feel less provocative is more productive.
jesus