So it's been a bit since I've blogged.  I'm getting lazy, I suppose.  But in truth, I'm trying to avoid making so many entries that are nothing more than glimpses into my dull routine.  This may be, in fact, an online diary, but that doesn't mean I need to bore you with entries about my daily life.

That being said, this past weekend was an unusual one for me, in that I had not one, but two dates.  And not with the same person, either.

Last Monday night, I placed an ad on Craigslist.  It was a long, somewhat rambling kind of thing, that was "inspired" by the fact that I'd made the mistake of watching a romantic comedy while I was already somewhat depressed.  Naturally, this made me feel worse, and so I posted. 

I don't know what I expected.  Maybe a small handful of responses.  All told, I got over a dozen, which did surprise me.  I replied to all of them, though I could tell from the initial emails that there was no way we'd really hit it off.  But there were three or four that stood out.  Well, I've now met in person with two of them.  One of them, I might meet this weekend.  No plans, yet, to meet anyone else. 

How'd the dates go?  Okay, I guess.  I really like both of them, but so far, I'm not feeling anything beyond friendship for them.  But y'know what?  That's perfectly fine.  I honestly never expected to find any sort of romance from the post.  But if I get a couple good friends?  That's successful.



Well, something else did come out of one of the dates: a new drink!

One of the girls told me a story of a report she'd done in grade school.  The report was on the country of Brazil.  And she got completely fascinated by the Brazilian weasel (known as the Coati).  Her report consisted largely of facts about this animal (which got her a bad grade and a "talking to" from her teacher for not taking the assignment seriously or something like that).

I said, "The Brazilian Weasel... that's a cocktail name if ever I heard one."

So I did a little research.  First, I learned that the national drink of Brazil is Cachaça.  This is a type of rum, but made from sugar cane, rather than molasses.  Next, I looked up the word "weasel" on Webtender.  I only found one drink that included that in the name.  It was made from tequila, rum 151, lemon juice, and sugar.  Well, I wanted it to be different, so I decided that the Brazilian Weasel should be Cachaça, Coke, and lemon juice.

Please don't drink this.  It's vile.

But y'know, the other beverage I think of when I think of Brazil is... yeah... coffee.  So, please do try this one:

        The Brazilian Weasel
  • 1 oz. Cachaça
  • 1 oz. Café de Nuit
  • 1 oz. Half-and-Half

Yummers.

Oh, just my thoughts on the Cachaça...  It's not that great.  I bought the 2-year old, "aged" version.  Still pretty harsh stuff.  On the other hand, the bottle of 12-year old Zaya rum I bought last week?  Wow.  Awesome.



So in the news today, I read a couple things of interest.  Well, okay, the first one is of morbid interest, and that's Paris Hilton has now begun her jail sentence.  She's been really whining a lot about this.  C'mon, bitch, it's 23 days!  In solitary confinement for 23 hours a day, for that matter!  Shit, if I ever did go to prison, I'd want solitary.  Three weeks sitting around doing nothing?  Hell, that's a vacation, to me.

But for Paris?  Poor bimbo had to call her shrink and complain that she couldn't eat or sleep and that her cell was "freezing cold."

Oy.  Y'know, I had more to say about this loser, but why bother?



Moving on...

"Fleeting Expletives" are now okay on prime time TV.  Yeah, the courts have said the FCC needs to lighten the hell up.

About fucking time.

Anyone who thinks their children don't already hear cuss words in school is living in a fantasy.  And anyone who wants the TV to be their babysitter needs a smack upside the head, anyway.

I'm not saying that kids shouldn't be made aware that certain language is inappropriate in certain circumstances.  But it's not too bright to "shelter" them from language that exists in the real world, in some vain hope that they'll never use such words.




 
   

 


 
 
jennheartsu on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives
Damn, fucking straight!! Oops.
masivemaple on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives

Well, I wanted it to be different, so I decided that the Brazilian Weasel should be Cachaça, Coke, and lemon juice.

Please don't drink this.  It's vile.

I think I could have predicted this outcome without actually tasting it.

C'mon, bitch, it's 23 days!

Now somebody's gonna show up and whine about how mean you are to poor oppressed celebrities--you know that, right?

 

The fact that anybody cares whether Paris Hilton goes to jail, doesn't go to jail, or drops dead just leaves me baffled.

 

The FCC doesn't just need to lighten up--dry up and blow away is more like it. If there were a poster-boy for pretending the First Amendment doesn't really exist, it'd be the FCC's very existence.

cardigan on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives

If there were a poster-boy for pretending the First Amendment doesn't really exist, it'd be the FCC's very existence.

You know I wholeheartedly agree with you, sir.  I have no problem with the "ratings system" that (I believe) was voluntarily taken on by the networks.  So even if the FCC weren't unconstitutional, the ratings system makes it irrelevant.

 

Now, don't get me started on required rating systems...

masivemaple on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives
As long as the only effect of the system is informational, I have no problem with rating systems. Even required rating systems...as long as the only effect is informational. It's when they decide that I can't ignore their ratings and let my kid watch/listen to/play whatever the hell strikes me as ok that I get hostile. That's the difference between requiring nutition information labels on food and deciding that, as a diabetic, I'm not allowed to eat more than X grams of carbohydrates.

 

(Not that I don't think that last will get here eventually...it is.)

masivemaple on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives

(Not that I don't think that last will get here eventually...it is.)

Or, rather, it will. Though I may well be too senile to notice by then.

cardigan on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives
Agreed... informational purposes only.  But as far as nutritional stuff... it's not like it's even possible to enforce such restrictions.
masivemaple on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives
You evidently believe that there are limits to how far such things can go. I believe you are mistaken, simply because so many people wouldn't utter a peep as long as it was "their" side pushing the measure and it doesn't seem to immediately affect them anyway.

 

In PA there is currently a proposal in the state House of Representatives to require random drug tests for welfare cash receipients; how hard would it be, do you think, to require an a1c (3-month average blood glucose) test for those on Medicade/Medicare? That wouldn't tell you exactly what the testees were eating, but it'd tell you if they were being bad boys and girls and shoving stuff in their mouths that they shouldn't.

cardigan on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives
Ah, I get where you're going with it.  I wasn't thinking along the lines of medical assistance funds.  Yeah, this I could see.  And honestly, I don't have a huge problem with it.  I don't see it as being a lot different from differences in what you can buy with food stamps or WIC vouchers.  People are getting something essentially for free, paid for out of the public coffers.  Like anything else, the public should be able to consider it a good investment.  No one wants to invest money in a company where the CEO doesn't care if the company does well or not, after all.

masivemaple on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives

People are getting something essentially for free, paid for out of the public coffers.

This may be true with regards to Medicare/Medicade receipiets--if they don't like the terms, they can refuse the service. Of course, the exact same thing can be said about any activity that might complicate health issues, including having sex. Perhaps state welfare offices should require chasitity belts and vows of celibacy.

 

But what is one of the political mantras today? "Universal health care"--which is to say Big Daddy takes care of his peasants' health needs. And if Big Daddy is taking care of everybody...why, then Big Daddy gets to decide you aren't allowed to stuff your face with certain things for your own good. And, perhaps, other things that you shouldn't be allowed to do for your own good as well.

 

(There--we've come up with a potential way to please both liberals and conservatives on one issue. Who says bridging the idiological divide is impossibloe?)

cardigan on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives
Except that, in principle, anyway, "Big Daddy" is you, me, and every other taxpayer.  Thus, if we don't like the way Big Daddy is handling our allowance, we can bitch about it and get him to change his tune.

 

In theory, of course.  Certainly, this government "of the people, by the people, and for the people" is not so much true in practice.

masivemaple on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives
Even if the reality worked exactly as the theory bills, it would still be bad news. All that would mean is that anybody could be forced to fit whatever box the majority of whoever bothers to vote decides to stick them in. And that's a notion that causes me to mutter assorted fleeting expletives.

cardigan on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives
*sigh*  True enough.  It's sad that we actually need laws to protect us from "the majority."  But mob mentality isn't something to fuck around with.

masivemaple on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives

It's sad that we actually need laws to protect us from "the majority."

We don't need laws to protect us from the majority; we need to prevent the majority from passing laws that screw everyone else. This may sound similar, but it isn't.

cardigan on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives
Mm.  Okay.  Point taken.
masivemaple on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives
That was my last point until the next shipment arrives, so don't lose it.

cardigan on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives
Yeah, sure, no prob--  

 

Aw, crap.  I broke it.

 

Can it be sharpened?

masivemaple on
Re: Paris Hilton, Brazilian Weasels, and Other Fleeting Expletives
Scrape it on the sidewalk a few dozen times--it'll do for the time being.

 
Login to replyToggle picture size
 

Latest Comment
Re: The List - VERY interesting! I was looking up the ep of L&O I'm watching right now on IMDB and lookie...

Read...


 
© 2005-2007 MindSay Interactive LLC
| Terms of Service
| Privacy Policy
My Account
Inbox
Account Settings
Lost Password?
Logout
Blog
Update Blog
Edit Old Entries
Pick a Theme
Customize Design
Modify Plugins
Community
Your Profile
Wiki Pages
MindSay Tags
Video & Photos
Geographic Directory
Inside MindSay
About MindSay
MindSay and RSS
Report Spam
Contact Us
Help