
GaryO36
Have Muslisms taken to Jihad? Or has a section of the Muslim world taken to resisting the world side western imposition of American values - also called imperialism?
Also why single out Islam for a few examples? There are many countries in the world practicing islam - and the majority of them aren't engaged in violent action.
Saying that Islam has taken to Jihad and various forms of terrrorism is to sweep a long brush over an entire population - it's akin to saying that if an element of the group engages in violent action then that makes that group collectively responsible. I don't understand your logic - or I understand it, but reject it completely.
Your argument is particularistic to its core. It's saying terrorism takes a unique character rather than simply about inflicing terror - the root word - onto others.
If following the latter , you would be unable to draw the conclusions you did - or at least, would be a bit more contextual in your analysis.
For example, you suggest that Iraqis - and followers of Islam in general - are engaging in terrorism due to adherence to a fundamentalist doctrine. Where does American imperialism fit into this equation? What about White supremacy?
Your argument is all the more confusing given your 4 and 1/3 line rebuttal of colonialism. Why not draw the connection with colonialism past with colonialism NOW? Is it so hard to see the parrallel?
For example, America invades Iraq. Most American soliders - at least in direct combat and contrary to popular belief - are White. Iraqis are brown skinned. Iraqis are brandished as backwards; America is presented enlightened, i.e., the same argument during "the heyday" of colonialism
Don't see the parralel?
Also, when you claim that "the world needs a superpower" and America is "still the best country for you job", on what basis shall I accepts your arguments?
You make a lot unsubstantiated claims without providing a smidgen of evidence.
Before I can properly access your argument, I'd like to hear more.
books